Oct 2016
concentrate on the symbols... the narrative style is that of being pedantically excited, it's put together haphazardly for a reason... the point being to concentrate on the symbols, most notably in the title, by suggesting that returning to letters, there's an opposite to Copernicus' compass, not regarding north and south, east and west... whether it's heliocentric of geocentric, the compass concerning letters and how they revolve and transform, akin to the later stages of summer and the earliest signs of autumn - or the nomadic paths of man, but simply, on a page.
indeed mathematics breeds a different
type of genius,
as i already said
mathematicians resound to agree:
we're not drafted to do arithmetic -
we're not sprinters
or the world's fastest at: 1 + 2 + 47 - 90 + 1056...
because our phonetic encoding
is overburdening and too much
akin to mathematical symbols -
B and 8
l or I and 1
6 and b
3 and E
S and 5
0 and O
if the Greeks built and Empire
that spanned into England
the Barbarians
would have never adopted the Greek
alphabet -
but since it was the Romans
that did so... the Barbarians exploited
the latin alphabet -
as they did...
it takes a different
way of thinking, we're not talking
etymology, we're talking things like:
organic chemistry's electron movement
diagrams... what is positive in Latin
and negative in Rune? or... what is missing
in Latin and necessary to remember Rune?
in between the disparity between
> and )
or ( and >
we have the resurrected sharpening
of encoding reminders: accents,
namely called diacritical marks...
or a game of matchsticks...
from the barbarian crude or chequered
flints in terms of chipped away curving-edges
into talking smoothed-marble buttocks of statues...
Bukowski was wrong... Caesar won
in the end...
Caesar cared less for world
power, his ultimate maxim was:
a sudden death...
and he won... he got
the sudden death...
he didn't say: death in
my sleep, but: sudden death...
he won, in the end.
i never stick to rules, me? a minor
anarchist, in terms of the Nato alphabet,
it's Rome rather than Romeo,
perhaps even Rodeo...
and it's Jules instead of Juliet...
Aardvark rather than Alpha
etc.,
or like refining crude oil...
the crude version is written as
ᚱ but the civilisation of the times wrote
R... odd.. they kept only
U in crude form , they actually invited these
northern conquerors because, as one
chisel-labourer said:
the elder alchemist
seeking a golden fern leaf
to turn stone into papyrus
and a chisel into a quill...
for all the shortcuts i could
have written, i was told that only U as in V
was the only available
aesthetic pardon...
thanks to bureaucracy
so many wars were waged,
because they were expected to not be
overly-eager in their duty,
but make shortcuts, which they didn't exhibit
because they ****** the thumb of power
till the bones appeared... bones i.e. runes...
all but a little empowerment
and the dictator complex
comes without armies
but pages of paper, and filofax dilemmas
of schedule;
and what became a revelation
of excess shortcuts: ᚱ into R
ᚹ into P
ᚾ into ł (orthodox Christians
make the sign of the cross: forehead,
chest, right shoulder, left shoulder
amen, or: the glue of the trinity -
liberal Christians make the sing of
the cross: forehead, chest, left shoulder,
right shoulder, amen; the orthodox
wear their marriage ring on their right hand
the liberal on the left hand, as with the
wristwatch... monogamy is so time consuming)
nonetheless adapting shortcut
chiselling in either stone or wood
and the need for the Roman term
beauty: curvature... invited
the barbarian adaptation
to the alphabet... as i already said,
had the Greeks moved that far north,
the Greek alphabet would have been erased...
primarily the problem of ᚦ and θ
ᚠ and φ (or the liturgy behind
the silent twins of the tetragrammaton)
cut each letter
open... entry point of later adaptation of
what the barbarians said: but we also have
crude elementary accenting of the approximates...
evolving the > into a ) will not do enough
justice! how easily F can be translated
and poured into the eyes...
the mystery lies in something that has no
archaeological prospect of artefact...
mentality lost in how phonetic encoding
evolved is what modernity calls:
concerns for mental health...
we can't simply resurrect the mentalities of
the fathers who revised runes into
Latin appropriation
by saying: we're ill because this
was never recorded, or that they were ill
because they were ferocious at the time
and spilt blood...
these hysterics trying
to see how one came into being from the other
is impossible... i just know that
it took a lot of straight lines
curvatures of similarity in Latin
and the ****** of chisel-worked in Rome
who said: quicker zigzag the runic R like
our pedantic variation of U in V
but what if i had to chisel in
the word pulverise? V L V?
comes out in
arithmetic - there are idiots either side:
I + IV + V = X...
i.e. ᛞ, Norse for day,
or simply d.
idiots either side...
oh just because the Arabs gave us numbers
we have saintly camel jockeys?
idiots either side...
some things correlate, some things don't...
but nonetheless Greek empire building
would have failed had it reached even Gaul...
let alone Britain...
i start my history here...
not with the big bang, not with Darwinism and
the monkey... here... among *these skeletons...
it was always going to be a collective
project...
which resulted in
revising the Rune ᛟ from the Latin o
but also adding the marriage
with ö... among other examples
come to think of it... looks like a crude upside-down
version of ω - of north
and the hardened determination
(in intellectual pursuits) -
of the south and beauty, of papyrus
and the awe-ratio
composed
of ? as that case
for democratically asking,
democratically not solving, and passing on
intellectual inspiration
&n
indeed mathematics breeds a different
type of genius,
as i already said
mathematicians resound to agree:
we're not drafted to do arithmetic -
we're not sprinters
or the world's fastest at: 1 + 2 + 47 - 90 + 1056...
because our phonetic encoding
is overburdening and too much
akin to mathematical symbols -
B and 8
l or I and 1
6 and b
3 and E
S and 5
0 and O
if the Greeks built and Empire
that spanned into England
the Barbarians
would have never adopted the Greek
alphabet -
but since it was the Romans
that did so... the Barbarians exploited
the latin alphabet -
as they did...
it takes a different
way of thinking, we're not talking
etymology, we're talking things like:
organic chemistry's electron movement
diagrams... what is positive in Latin
and negative in Rune? or... what is missing
in Latin and necessary to remember Rune?
in between the disparity between
> and )
or ( and >
we have the resurrected sharpening
of encoding reminders: accents,
namely called diacritical marks...
or a game of matchsticks...
from the barbarian crude or chequered
flints in terms of chipped away curving-edges
into talking smoothed-marble buttocks of statues...
Bukowski was wrong... Caesar won
in the end...
Caesar cared less for world
power, his ultimate maxim was:
a sudden death...
and he won... he got
the sudden death...
he didn't say: death in
my sleep, but: sudden death...
he won, in the end.
i never stick to rules, me? a minor
anarchist, in terms of the Nato alphabet,
it's Rome rather than Romeo,
perhaps even Rodeo...
and it's Jules instead of Juliet...
Aardvark rather than Alpha
etc.,
or like refining crude oil...
the crude version is written as
ᚱ but the civilisation of the times wrote
R... odd.. they kept only
U in crude form , they actually invited these
northern conquerors because, as one
chisel-labourer said:
the elder alchemist
seeking a golden fern leaf
to turn stone into papyrus
and a chisel into a quill...
for all the shortcuts i could
have written, i was told that only U as in V
was the only available
aesthetic pardon...
thanks to bureaucracy
so many wars were waged,
because they were expected to not be
overly-eager in their duty,
but make shortcuts, which they didn't exhibit
because they ****** the thumb of power
till the bones appeared... bones i.e. runes...
all but a little empowerment
and the dictator complex
comes without armies
but pages of paper, and filofax dilemmas
of schedule;
and what became a revelation
of excess shortcuts: ᚱ into R
ᚹ into P
ᚾ into ł (orthodox Christians
make the sign of the cross: forehead,
chest, right shoulder, left shoulder
amen, or: the glue of the trinity -
liberal Christians make the sing of
the cross: forehead, chest, left shoulder,
right shoulder, amen; the orthodox
wear their marriage ring on their right hand
the liberal on the left hand, as with the
wristwatch... monogamy is so time consuming)
nonetheless adapting shortcut
chiselling in either stone or wood
and the need for the Roman term
beauty: curvature... invited
the barbarian adaptation
to the alphabet... as i already said,
had the Greeks moved that far north,
the Greek alphabet would have been erased...
primarily the problem of ᚦ and θ
ᚠ and φ (or the liturgy behind
the silent twins of the tetragrammaton)
cut each letter
open... entry point of later adaptation of
what the barbarians said: but we also have
crude elementary accenting of the approximates...
evolving the > into a ) will not do enough
justice! how easily F can be translated
and poured into the eyes...
the mystery lies in something that has no
archaeological prospect of artefact...
mentality lost in how phonetic encoding
evolved is what modernity calls:
concerns for mental health...
we can't simply resurrect the mentalities of
the fathers who revised runes into
Latin appropriation
by saying: we're ill because this
was never recorded, or that they were ill
because they were ferocious at the time
and spilt blood...
these hysterics trying
to see how one came into being from the other
is impossible... i just know that
it took a lot of straight lines
curvatures of similarity in Latin
and the ****** of chisel-worked in Rome
who said: quicker zigzag the runic R like
our pedantic variation of U in V
but what if i had to chisel in
the word pulverise? V L V?
comes out in
arithmetic - there are idiots either side:
I + IV + V = X...
i.e. ᛞ, Norse for day,
or simply d.
idiots either side...
oh just because the Arabs gave us numbers
we have saintly camel jockeys?
idiots either side...
some things correlate, some things don't...
but nonetheless Greek empire building
would have failed had it reached even Gaul...
let alone Britain...
i start my history here...
not with the big bang, not with Darwinism and
the monkey... here... among *these skeletons...
it was always going to be a collective
project...
which resulted in
revising the Rune ᛟ from the Latin o
but also adding the marriage
with ö... among other examples
come to think of it... looks like a crude upside-down
version of ω - of north
and the hardened determination
(in intellectual pursuits) -
of the south and beauty, of papyrus
and the awe-ratio
composed
of ? as that case
for democratically asking,
democratically not solving, and passing on
intellectual inspiration
&n
