a woman might bemoan her spring-like beauty,
to a fleeting a measure,
but a man will bemoan likewise, for
it ever being there
for no reason other than to age and corrupt
readying the infantile imbecile for suicide;
thus a woman is encouraged to use her
beauty in what only men her age dream of -
which is why so many commit to its finality
in greater number -
the open society and her enemies /
the closed society and her allies -
for it is true, a woman's beauty is a man's
morals -both recede exponentially
while the jungle is erased -
yet neither were to be exploited using
an object neither worth a hammer or a nail...
a man is prone to morals while a woman to beauty -
once they age, man is prone to aesthetics
via sculpture, while woman is prone to jurisprudence
via the debate - loose women....
one turns beauty into more beauty...
the other turns complication into more complication...
whatever i say will not make me commit
to the virtue of animals... nor will the crucifix ordeal
make me believe... i'm Chinese on the matter...
as promised: kneel!
"god" said: i won't.
China replied: chow mein you too!
and that's where i come in.
it's not surprise that women abuse their beauty
without morality,
and that men expect morality so early on with only
pensioner Popes to keep morale when they age.
something foetal must be dealing the cards -
i can't speak for the unfair tactic as playground for
**** with easy women and moral men...
circumcising the "excess" skin is another thing when
circumcising vocabulary - thank you feminism -
i got the part when young girls preferred older men,
but short-breathing me shut with what words
i use... *****! no, wait, let's not insult
prostitutes... DONKEY *****!