the alphabet is incorrect when nouns come to use, why necessitate the ordeal of a, b c... x, y, z - the first sequence an order of literacy, the second sequence an order arithmetic - the correct lineage of letters from henry ii to richard the i, to king john was written in the minor carta of (bytes): tetra-, petra-, exa-, zetta-, and crucially yotta-; everywhere transgressions of the original standard arrangement of the first memory placebo you learn at school, placebo memories out of schooling, ineffective memorisation swayed by the self, and soon that lost too; memories that shall please the doctrines, where once we were coalminers of our selves looking for that nugget of cold, by being schooled to restrictions, we found only many nuggets of coal, and as they say: the cold grey en masse realism of being suited and booted with the sole reward: procrastination and procreation.*
indeed quantify in the realm of ∞ (infinity), but then express a quality of 1 (the union disregarding obstructions of centimetre, millimetre and nanometre, or the excess of gigabytes) avoiding the kantian symbolism of 0 - negation - of any number to your liking given power over the base: with the squared acidic or otherwise, mitigating ∞ of the unfathomable, to search for deo sapiens is to search for yourself when others defined you in the narrated enclosure of **** sapiens and the 20th century's failures: it's the pedantry of unlearning praying to something and simply thinking about it: secular **** and you the wriggling anaemic tadpole.