Sitting and waiting in the hospital reception area, gave me time to think; and feeling even warier, having just suffered the very first nosebleed of my life and carrying within my wallet a warning card so rife with the advice that its possessor is subject to the danger (I know this may sound somewhat dog in manger) inherent in an anticoagulant called rivaroxaban and (if this doesn’t overstretch your attention span) in the event of bruising or of bleeding medical advice must be sought before proceeding any further. That is to say, at once, or even faster. or, at least, with speed sufficient to avert disaster.
So, as I say, there sat I contemplating (no, not my navel, but) the rather aggravating progress of events that had brought me to this juncture, that ended recently in a procedural puncture preparatory to the insertion of a stent the culmination of which they had to circumvent. This gave me time, while waiting for the nurse to minister to my problem, or at least rehearse for my own delectation the best course I would have to follow, not to make the situation worse. At this point let me interrupt my own amorphous rambling to pay due tribute to the hospital service.
This versifying for which I have developed a proclivity means that I’m never at a loss these days for an activity to occupy a boring period of gross inaction replacing boredom with cerebral satisfaction. So there I was, awaiting the arrival of the ****** nurse. (Sorry, that sounds like an awful curse.) In fact her blood-related treatment meant a lot to me and was a simple adjective for her phlebotomy. At that point my thoughts turned quite naturally to the forthcoming repeat angiography, and all the helpful comments by my tender-hearted friends, and the advice that they imparted.
I was quite astonished by the growing number of people who this affliction did encumber all of whom it seemed were anxious to ensure that I was quite relaxed about what I had to endure. Instead of being reassured I wondered why the pessimists apparently were so outnumbered. Indeed the views were so greatly one-sided I found it strange there were no “undecided”. Are they reluctant because of superstition? Or is it that they wish to avoid an admission that their empathic fear of ****** invasion has led them to avoid arterial-related implantation?
But most of all I felt there should be scored some “Nos” to balance the procedural record. but they have been unbelievably silent, whilst I’ve been growing every day more violent. Is it, dare I think, that it is just perhaps because they may have suffered a relapse? And then I had the most amazing thought of all, and your objections I am anxious to forestall: but I feel impelled to discuss the thought that there’s a reason why they have not brought their negativity to this post. Is it quite beyond the pale to suggest they’re no longer here to tell the tale?