.reiteration... em.. you're not internet providers... are you?! the best you'll ever be, is, software *******... you're about as invested in hardware, as the mafia is invigorated by mainstream politics...******* wankers... you what?! huh?! censorship?! who's supplying you with the copper wires?! you?! ha ha ha ha! how about getting leg ***** by a mongrel tongue... and considering your type of companies, as, serious, "mediators"... no hardware... just a software monopoly... ******* **** wasps! you almost want to cannibalize their presence! like... ever taste bone marrow? these "companies"... are teasing a taste of bone marrow! i want to eat something... these, companies, forgot, that, they're, not, service, providers! d'uh! and they're making the dicta?! inch copper **** making all the rules... what rules?! they don't make the rules... they're not hardware enforcers! they block my presence, i subsequently return to over-exemplifying using the scissors, counter the computer! yeah?!
em...
but you're not BT...
British Telecommunications?
the hell is up with these
software nuggets?!
how can google,
facebook,
youtube, ban, someone...
when they pay...
for their hardware provider?
did, said companies,
pay, for the copper wires?!
i'm pretty sure the answer is
no...
unless you've not been banned
by authentic internet providers,
but, rather,
banned by content creation
mediums?!
**** 'em!
**** 'em silly!
they do not actually
own access to internet
provision, i.e. ACCESS...
they do not own
the armory
of copper wiring....
that connects the dots...
*******!
BT or SKY or ******
pulls the plug,
you're all out!
you get the
differential "bias" against
the format of software
contra hardware?
no?
there are,
internet, providers...
there is the hardware of
occupational hardware user basis...
these companies...
censoring...
have a software stature,
without a hardware status...
want to rephrase the thesaurus
to concern yourself
with legislative phraseology?
really?
me? can't be bothered...
do it yourself,
VEGAN dietary requirements
and... whatever.
but you can't deny someone
content provision...
when they're paying for
an internet access...
these software companies
do not have to answer
to governments...
they have to answer
to hardware providers...
internet access deposits /
access points...
not governments...
hardware instigators...
oh, really?
software censorship?
if there's no one using
the hardware?!
good luck...
and a goof ball speeding!
these companies, who are exercising
"depth",
of the parameters of conscription
of legit consent?
they have this amnesia...
this amnesia...
of...
not being hardware utilities...
i.e.?
a comic book...
without the printing press...
savvy?
now i'm mowing down
eyed
claustrophobic eyed -
horses running,
with shutters on their eyes
for the added advantage
of tunnel vision...
that Bane scene equivalent...
with the quote -
crashing this plane...
"who" are these companies
to dictate,
"correct" internet usage?
they're not internet providers...
to begin with...
if... a company like SKY...
or BT... or ******...
obstructed internet access
of a person?
i'd be nodding...
in a coherent access of
agreement...
but...
these websites are not
hardware, they're software...
see the difference?
they're not internet providers...
they're pixel blank bulk anticipating
canvases...
unless there's something
wrong with the original idea,
of an un- investigated
genesis of a pixel blank?!
can i make this an issue
with your, internet provider?
i don't like you excluding
the content of the content
that is a blank pixel anticipatory
excavation wait...
sorry...
i don't like you miscarrying my
payment of internet access...
having censored interactive outlet
canvases...
i pay for one... i pay for all...
can you please pay
the proper amount of
compensation to the hardware
companies that provide
universal internet access to
the full spectrum of internet users?!
namely?
BT... SKY... ******?
yes?!