Such a naïve philosopher can I be,
not opposed to a skeptic philosopher,
but rather in tandem with it.
Such a naïve philosopher,
not necessarily in terms of Realism,
but certainly in some terms.
Such a naïve philosopher,
yet such a skeptic one as well:
I'm not the best of both worlds,
maybe the rest of both worlds;
I'm testing both worlds,
contesting both worlds;
ingesting both worlds,
detesting both worlds;
bereft of both worlds,
in jest of both words:
I don't
exactly see
how the two
are mutually
exclusive:
Naïvety and Skepticism
seem to be a match well made.
But, by inner Skeptic
is calling me Naïve.
Mar 12, 2014
Mar 12, 2014 at 2:13 AM UTC
Such a naïve philosopher can I be,
not opposed to a skeptic philosopher,
but rather in tandem with it.
Such a naïve philosopher,
not necessarily in terms of Realism,
but certainly in some terms.
Such a naïve philosopher,
yet such a skeptic one as well:
I'm not the best of both worlds,
maybe the rest of both worlds;
I'm testing both worlds,
contesting both worlds;
ingesting both worlds,
detesting both worlds;
bereft of both worlds,
in jest of both words:
I don't
exactly see
how the two
are mutually
exclusive:
Naïvety and Skepticism
seem to be a match well made.
But, by inner Skeptic
is calling me Naïve.
I have no idea whence this came,
but here it is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Na%C3%AFve_realism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_skepticism
