Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
removed.polaroid-scrabblePoems
i already said that i made a mistake:       hijab            and niqab...          but hence the q.                   a question, not a queue standing outside the kew gardens...    but this enforced diacritical markings over j-ay             hey!                                or iota (ι) -                                       it's enforced... why not a candle í of the acute iota?                       he-dziab = hijab you don't say hi / high all of a sudden, followed-up with jab...                                       the diacritical **** of iota, can morph into an "umlaut" whereby i can morph into a "digraph", i.e.            hi- = ee...            or simply ē (which is what prolongs the stress on the letter).                 what could i ever conclude with having written the following?     well... the first philosophy book i ever bought... in camden town,                   plato's θηæτητυς   and i do treat eta (η), as if it were epsilon (ε) with an acute diacritical mark hovering over it.              anyway... it only took                    over two-thousand years of history to deal with...           so there's plato's theaetetus: "strange" how siamese consonants are named digraphs, while siamese vowels are named graphemes...    there are more digraphs than graphemes,   since there are only two graphemes: æ & œ,             no other variants, i.e., well that's one to claim, although segregated by . .      and those are two unique words.               yet in the theaetetus dialogue,      socrates is talking about     S O        so-         (+)            -crat-      (+)     -es, a syllable broken down into letters (units) -        but this is the 21st century,                   and what minor detail occurred in the 20th century?                       something similar, i suppose... the same concerning bringing it down to just two letters...                      heidegger's ponderings (iv, 221): why do i two g's in my name?                    at first i'd suggest he asks the question as a case of vanity, but i suspect there's a question concerning aesthetics of spelling...    at least in english that's the case,      the germans write like chemists,           they compound excessively,        and they don't hyphenate their words like their english cousins...                 so he goes on to state why his nickname is gg (jee-jee)              g1. güte (benevolence, not pity)     g2. geduld (patience, supreme will)...        sure, but why not géduld?        ah... because that would be frown-ser (french) - and that would hardly be patience,        it would be a 35 hour working week...                        other nations frown and say: you're ******* lazy!                      and the french reply: qui-z la            pita-mont (πíta-mąnt)    /   (we're patient).
0
Jun 14, 2017
Jun 14, 2017 at 12:26 PM UTC
correcting mistakes
i already said that i made a mistake:       hijab            and niqab...          but hence the q.                   a question, not a queue standing outside the kew gardens...    but this enforced diacritical markings over j-ay             hey!                                or iota (ι) -                                       it's enforced... why not a candle í of the acute iota?                       he-dziab = hijab you don't say hi / high all of a sudden, followed-up with jab...                                       the diacritical **** of iota, can morph into an "umlaut" whereby i can morph into a "digraph", i.e.            hi- = ee...            or simply ē (which is what prolongs the stress on the letter).                 what could i ever conclude with having written the following?     well... the first philosophy book i ever bought... in camden town,                   plato's θηæτητυς   and i do treat eta (η), as if it were epsilon (ε) with an acute diacritical mark hovering over it.              anyway... it only took                    over two-thousand years of history to deal with...           so there's plato's theaetetus: "strange" how siamese consonants are named digraphs, while siamese vowels are named graphemes...    there are more digraphs than graphemes,   since there are only two graphemes: æ & œ,             no other variants, i.e., well that's one to claim, although segregated by . .      and those are two unique words.               yet in the theaetetus dialogue,      socrates is talking about     S O        so-         (+)            -crat-      (+)     -es, a syllable broken down into letters (units) -        but this is the 21st century,                   and what minor detail occurred in the 20th century?                       something similar, i suppose... the same concerning bringing it down to just two letters...                      heidegger's ponderings (iv, 221): why do i two g's in my name?                    at first i'd suggest he asks the question as a case of vanity, but i suspect there's a question concerning aesthetics of spelling...    at least in english that's the case,      the germans write like chemists,           they compound excessively,        and they don't hyphenate their words like their english cousins...                 so he goes on to state why his nickname is gg (jee-jee)              g1. güte (benevolence, not pity)     g2. geduld (patience, supreme will)...        sure, but why not géduld?        ah... because that would be frown-ser (french) - and that would hardly be patience,        it would be a 35 hour working week...                        other nations frown and say: you're ******* lazy!                      and the french reply: qui-z la            pita-mont (πíta-mąnt)    /   (we're patient).
Written by
removed.polaroid-scrabble
36/M
Jun 14, 2017
Jun 14, 2017 at 12:26 PM UTC
Request permission to use this poem