Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
removed.polaroid-scrabblePoems
loo... sir...                                                     ser (also      cheese, in polish; bita   śmietana; whipped smetana)...                            loser...   well... loo... you need the o to be acute, to morph into a u... so... mmm... lóser;     but the english seem to have no         conceptualißation of differentiating          phonetic units; should i state u as contra ω (omega)?             or should i just reconile the difference with a u with a marcon (ū)?         or reiterate a prolonged sound     akin to u, but instead a doubling,                              akin to pool? - you know what agitates people? you know what agitates people to commit the crimes? no, it's not the word islam... you start calling someone a loser?               you're going to get a "winner's" response. the win?         well, you know... a bunch of people ending up, dead. identifying at muslim,     adhering to the label islam... that's not the problem... you agitate these young males with what's a win, and what isn't? and you keep adding the spice of      LOSER?          you're not going to live in a safe society...             people do react to words emotionally... but how could you understand, given your reverence for icons...       that's the foundation of islam... a sensitivity for words, toward using them... after all, you can have a conversation when staring at a painting...          but when you keep using that word loser... over and over again... in your capitalist methodology...   oh look... 20 odd dead in manchester.... i understand islam in this way...   images don't have the capacity to create the immediacy of an emotional conteney're t that words have provide / reveal; that's compared to:    hearing a hallucination is more frightening than seeing one...         since we've been able to provide images of jupiter, or saturn...          you keep pushing that message about winners, and losers...         you're going to get the same answer from the "losers"...       the death of those who "could" have become winners...         you understand the drift you're   solidifying?        it's not exactly beck's thrill of song. - well, if men paint more than women, and women having a higher affiliation   to "language"...     men, really get more emotional with regard to how language is used...        seeing a painting they're like... blah... but affix them a word, akin to loser...                                         knife or gun?
0
May 23, 2017
May 23, 2017 at 7:36 AM UTC
lóßer
loo... sir...                                                     ser (also      cheese, in polish; bita   śmietana; whipped smetana)...                            loser...   well... loo... you need the o to be acute, to morph into a u... so... mmm... lóser;     but the english seem to have no         conceptualißation of differentiating          phonetic units; should i state u as contra ω (omega)?             or should i just reconile the difference with a u with a marcon (ū)?         or reiterate a prolonged sound     akin to u, but instead a doubling,                              akin to pool? - you know what agitates people? you know what agitates people to commit the crimes? no, it's not the word islam... you start calling someone a loser?               you're going to get a "winner's" response. the win?         well, you know... a bunch of people ending up, dead. identifying at muslim,     adhering to the label islam... that's not the problem... you agitate these young males with what's a win, and what isn't? and you keep adding the spice of      LOSER?          you're not going to live in a safe society...             people do react to words emotionally... but how could you understand, given your reverence for icons...       that's the foundation of islam... a sensitivity for words, toward using them... after all, you can have a conversation when staring at a painting...          but when you keep using that word loser... over and over again... in your capitalist methodology...   oh look... 20 odd dead in manchester.... i understand islam in this way...   images don't have the capacity to create the immediacy of an emotional conteney're t that words have provide / reveal; that's compared to:    hearing a hallucination is more frightening than seeing one...         since we've been able to provide images of jupiter, or saturn...          you keep pushing that message about winners, and losers...         you're going to get the same answer from the "losers"...       the death of those who "could" have become winners...         you understand the drift you're   solidifying?        it's not exactly beck's thrill of song. - well, if men paint more than women, and women having a higher affiliation   to "language"...     men, really get more emotional with regard to how language is used...        seeing a painting they're like... blah... but affix them a word, akin to loser...                                         knife or gun?
Written by
removed.polaroid-scrabble
36/M
May 23, 2017
May 23, 2017 at 7:36 AM UTC
Request permission to use this poem