i don't know about you, but ******** out
a high-fibre ****
out of your ***
feels just as good,
if not more,
as good,
as having an ******
**** when that slug slides
out?
thump! plop! ploop!
given that...
i can't imagine shoving anything
up that alley...
there's too much
pleasure easing something out
from that cul de sac....
why would i even want to
stick something in there?
perhaps having ******** allows
you to make that comparison...
taking a **** can feel
just as good as having an ******
or urinating, with a ********
but that's just me...
we know how western society
is oh so objective / "scientific"...
so... why would we need food critics for?
or wine critics?
it either tastes great...
or it tastes like ****
if we're being so ******* scientific,
do we need these scientific
differentiations to be respected in our,
so called, society?
who needs them?!
off to the guillotine with them,
alongside that ***** of an antoinette!
what sort of society prizes
itself as being primordially-scientific,
clueless ******* objective by my say,
and then champions restaurant critics,
or food critics... or critics for their own
worth...
what part of giving a critique of food
is objective, to later bombast a stance
for championing darwinism as the pinnacle
of humanity's total worth?
maybe i missed something.
anglophone wankers;
have a jerk-and-whammy on this crap!
like all of engloosh science:
robin hood, who could, but never would.
May 21, 2017
May 21, 2017 at 2:25 PM UTC
i don't know about you, but ******** out
a high-fibre ****
out of your ***
feels just as good,
if not more,
as good,
as having an ******
**** when that slug slides
out?
thump! plop! ploop!
given that...
i can't imagine shoving anything
up that alley...
there's too much
pleasure easing something out
from that cul de sac....
why would i even want to
stick something in there?
perhaps having ******** allows
you to make that comparison...
taking a **** can feel
just as good as having an ******
or urinating, with a ********
but that's just me...
we know how western society
is oh so objective / "scientific"...
so... why would we need food critics for?
or wine critics?
it either tastes great...
or it tastes like ****
if we're being so ******* scientific,
do we need these scientific
differentiations to be respected in our,
so called, society?
who needs them?!
off to the guillotine with them,
alongside that ***** of an antoinette!
what sort of society prizes
itself as being primordially-scientific,
clueless ******* objective by my say,
and then champions restaurant critics,
or food critics... or critics for their own
worth...
what part of giving a critique of food
is objective, to later bombast a stance
for championing darwinism as the pinnacle
of humanity's total worth?
maybe i missed something.
anglophone wankers;
have a jerk-and-whammy on this crap!
like all of engloosh science:
robin hood, who could, but never would.