Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
removed.polaroid-scrabblePoems
does the youth of today realise it doesn't run a monopoly                            of internet content?         do they? really?!           with the context of internet banking... and online shopping... can youth of today please **** off with their belitteling chants   and, please  use the playground? it's become a bit like giving     an aged psychopath a red button, to launch a nuclear weapon... oh wait: here comes the nation       getting all paranoid... being the sole powehouse to have... actually detonated it on a civilian area!         yeah... russia is bad... no no tommy, no no jim...               they're like germans... they imploded... and felt guilty... but instead of producing great machines of the 4 wheels... they decided upon great movies... guilt is internalised in many shapes and sizes...                   the french were reasonable though...       it's a bit like that fire-cracker story... set of a petard in your hand when it's open... you'll get a scratch...       but set off the fire-cracker (petard)         while your hand is clenched...      boom! try waving after that...                       the french were reasonable in that they did their nuclear tests         in aquatic environments...         natural insulators...                       that's actually not reasonable in the puritan sense of the words...       where was the japanese army bombing the **** out of the tsunami wave of                                          2011 tōhoku? i swear the army could have intervened... bombed the **** out of the massive wave                                   and stopping it by dividing it... where was the *** army?       oh right... nowhere... there was a helicopter with a reporter going: oh ha! nagasaki!                                kimono sa ka!               i swear... if they bombed the **** out of that wave, it wouldn't have travelled inland and ever had done the damage... that it had done...         so much for the army... and so much for the *** emperor...                  eh?                you bomb the tsunami wave... the wave doesn't travel inland...              1 + 1 = 2?               really? was that the time to consider    the question as a rhetorical ambiguity? by the way? there's no such thing as a rhetorical question... not in the way the phrase is dropped...        you really can't ask a "rhetorical question" if you're rhetorically sound, i.e. readied to blah blah for the next half hour...                               who asks a rhetorical question is not someone already performing the sophist art of performance speech that goes: on and on, on and on...   if someone says: that was a rhetorical question... it's just covert tactic for them to keep on talking...      what the **** is a rhetorical question? answer? the person asking that question,             keeping up with their monologue.                     a rhetorical question doesn't endorse a dialogue... a rhetorical question, as a phrase              is a solipsistic / sophist tactic: the two ought to be synonymous...              for the person talking... to just keep on talking (you can do that pigeon neck movement           speaking the italics... yeah... like you're head-banging).
0
Apr 6, 2017
Apr 6, 2017 at 2:37 PM UTC
youth and internet monopoly of content / rhetorical "question"
does the youth of today realise it doesn't run a monopoly                            of internet content?         do they? really?!           with the context of internet banking... and online shopping... can youth of today please **** off with their belitteling chants   and, please  use the playground? it's become a bit like giving     an aged psychopath a red button, to launch a nuclear weapon... oh wait: here comes the nation       getting all paranoid... being the sole powehouse to have... actually detonated it on a civilian area!         yeah... russia is bad... no no tommy, no no jim...               they're like germans... they imploded... and felt guilty... but instead of producing great machines of the 4 wheels... they decided upon great movies... guilt is internalised in many shapes and sizes...                   the french were reasonable though...       it's a bit like that fire-cracker story... set of a petard in your hand when it's open... you'll get a scratch...       but set off the fire-cracker (petard)         while your hand is clenched...      boom! try waving after that...                       the french were reasonable in that they did their nuclear tests         in aquatic environments...         natural insulators...                       that's actually not reasonable in the puritan sense of the words...       where was the japanese army bombing the **** out of the tsunami wave of                                          2011 tōhoku? i swear the army could have intervened... bombed the **** out of the massive wave                                   and stopping it by dividing it... where was the *** army?       oh right... nowhere... there was a helicopter with a reporter going: oh ha! nagasaki!                                kimono sa ka!               i swear... if they bombed the **** out of that wave, it wouldn't have travelled inland and ever had done the damage... that it had done...         so much for the army... and so much for the *** emperor...                  eh?                you bomb the tsunami wave... the wave doesn't travel inland...              1 + 1 = 2?               really? was that the time to consider    the question as a rhetorical ambiguity? by the way? there's no such thing as a rhetorical question... not in the way the phrase is dropped...        you really can't ask a "rhetorical question" if you're rhetorically sound, i.e. readied to blah blah for the next half hour...                               who asks a rhetorical question is not someone already performing the sophist art of performance speech that goes: on and on, on and on...   if someone says: that was a rhetorical question... it's just covert tactic for them to keep on talking...      what the **** is a rhetorical question? answer? the person asking that question,             keeping up with their monologue.                     a rhetorical question doesn't endorse a dialogue... a rhetorical question, as a phrase              is a solipsistic / sophist tactic: the two ought to be synonymous...              for the person talking... to just keep on talking (you can do that pigeon neck movement           speaking the italics... yeah... like you're head-banging).
Written by
removed.polaroid-scrabble
36/M
Apr 6, 2017
Apr 6, 2017 at 2:37 PM UTC
Request permission to use this poem