the templars can sing all they want... we're dealing with really sick people with the insurrection of the nag hammadi library!
kaptur...
of a monk's hood...
kapć -
slipper -
noun-verb translation,
for some reason,
other than what the orthodox
people state it being...
but how would you
ascribe the trill to R using the existing
diacritical marks?
and example...
a monk's hood:
kaptur v. káptür:
both instances exist and are equally
justifiable - let's suppose there is
a need to add a diacritical mark on
one of the consonants,
k? no... due to c and q...
p? papa pa... no...
t? † or st. andrew's X?
no... r... R though... i can revise the vowels
to embody syllables... acute a to cut up
the word: ka- like a bad crow onomatopoeia...
-ptoor hence the umlaut doubling up
on the U parabola...
:: :: :: ::
but i want the trill R! i want the sign denoting
that it should be "rolled"... rattled...
the rattle snake symbol...
no, not the french vogue of
levitating it toward the hark... the phlegm consonant...
i don't want that... ȑ? i.e. " above the r?
it's a real word though...
the word: kap-tur.
a monk's hood...
and depending on how you engage
disecting a word according to the rule of syllables...
there's a higher power that also dissects words:
diacritical markings, that was invested in
by guidance of the thought: it will make it easier...
evidently it made it harder...
funny me, in the 21st century pointing
this out.
e.g. : + u = o
dot dot... join up the dots for a circle
and then say: : + u = oo.
ooh! steven fry playing
austin powers! yeah baby! yeah!
Mar 27, 2017
Mar 27, 2017 at 9:43 PM UTC
the templars can sing all they want... we're dealing with really sick people with the insurrection of the nag hammadi library!
kaptur...
of a monk's hood...
kapć -
slipper -
noun-verb translation,
for some reason,
other than what the orthodox
people state it being...
but how would you
ascribe the trill to R using the existing
diacritical marks?
and example...
a monk's hood:
kaptur v. káptür:
both instances exist and are equally
justifiable - let's suppose there is
a need to add a diacritical mark on
one of the consonants,
k? no... due to c and q...
p? papa pa... no...
t? † or st. andrew's X?
no... r... R though... i can revise the vowels
to embody syllables... acute a to cut up
the word: ka- like a bad crow onomatopoeia...
-ptoor hence the umlaut doubling up
on the U parabola...
:: :: :: ::
but i want the trill R! i want the sign denoting
that it should be "rolled"... rattled...
the rattle snake symbol...
no, not the french vogue of
levitating it toward the hark... the phlegm consonant...
i don't want that... ȑ? i.e. " above the r?
it's a real word though...
the word: kap-tur.
a monk's hood...
and depending on how you engage
disecting a word according to the rule of syllables...
there's a higher power that also dissects words:
diacritical markings, that was invested in
by guidance of the thought: it will make it easier...
evidently it made it harder...
funny me, in the 21st century pointing
this out.
e.g. : + u = o
dot dot... join up the dots for a circle
and then say: : + u = oo.
ooh! steven fry playing
austin powers! yeah baby! yeah!