because the english language was blatantly
trying to keep the romans at the gates
and in check and in some sort of ******
need to penetrate the sulphur
cliffs of dover (i'm a daltonist
mind you, i see them as sulphur
tinged than a morose magnolia
pale slightly pinky) -
because the old guard was kept,
no barbaric diacritical innovation
was applied,
and because of this,
instead of acquiring the barbaric
ß
(sh s z ś
interchange) or
the barbaric egalitèr(e) -
yes, looks pretty, but a flying ****
in terms of comprehension, porky...
so instead of revised latin phonetic optic
encoding, we have the modern
dilemma of english over-use of acronyms,
e.g.: 2moro, 2nite, gr8, *** tfh, ***
the english language has become acronym mad
and subsequently, very very ugly.
Mar 6, 2016
Mar 6, 2016 at 5:09 PM UTC
because the english language was blatantly
trying to keep the romans at the gates
and in check and in some sort of ******
need to penetrate the sulphur
cliffs of dover (i'm a daltonist
mind you, i see them as sulphur
tinged than a morose magnolia
pale slightly pinky) -
because the old guard was kept,
no barbaric diacritical innovation
was applied,
and because of this,
instead of acquiring the barbaric
ß
(sh s z ś
interchange) or
the barbaric egalitèr(e) -
yes, looks pretty, but a flying ****
in terms of comprehension, porky...
so instead of revised latin phonetic optic
encoding, we have the modern
dilemma of english over-use of acronyms,
e.g.: 2moro, 2nite, gr8, *** tfh, ***
the english language has become acronym mad
and subsequently, very very ugly.