Iconic ionic eye-on-ic
of
flowering flow,
glowering glow,
showering show;
towering though
meek.
Aug 2, 2012
Aug 2, 2012 at 12:10 AM UTC
How many complete pathways of choices are there?
OR
How many choices are left to achieve completion [!]
Either offers an accurate divisor into the number of possibilities "n" roughly at whatever is the above determined level which is a power called "m". n^m, roughly...divided by either the # of pathways or the choices that are left [!] to completion.
Either divisor will serve by ridding us of duplicate iterations of over-multiplied possibilities inside of roughly n^m.
Put another way, simple estimations of "n" at the indicated power level do not recognize that
1) more than one path arrives to a conclusion;
Nor do simple estimations at indicated power levels recognize that
2) apparent particulars from which to work toward completion are actually not different particulars--half of them are double counted at the level of being two choices from complete due to the dimensionality of the whole becoming complete.
So the impact of having a divisor is strongest either when:
1) working toward completion from levels that already include almost all dimensions of particulars or else
2) whenever operating at low levels of power which have only a few pathways.
Estimations of possibilities are easily too high if not considering the adjustments for cases 1) and 2).
These are for occasions of having more than one possibility.
However:
The number of complete outcomes that are reachable, divided by all choosable pathways = n/n = 1 .
Or else, any one outcome chosen from its penultimate particulars through to completeness = 1/1 = 1 .
Thus,
Singular possibility is by definition, complete, whole, created, ultimate, and embraced in all of its dimensions. It is both one easily won and/or one, fully, dimensionally itself.
(Whatever is not and is not divided,
or, is nothing left unchosen
= truly naught and something not found = 0.)
Sources: Closed dimensional choice paths (the geometry of the powers depicted) and Pascal's Triangle
Jun 25, 2012
Jun 25, 2012 at 5:50 AM UTC
In my experience, you said.
Oh that's what you saw.
I would never admit such thoughts.
How brave you are.
How well oriented.
Thoughts are not who we are, you say.
We breathe, easy with who we get to be;
appreciating non-brokeness.
You freely share how it's been.
I feel it too.
I get it.
Such relief ... to strictly have thoughts ...
So it suddenly occurs to you:
"But I don't know if I can really listen to him. I'm frustrated!
You want me to get what happened in his experience!?! I don't know."
[I can't hear! I can't hear!]
"Yep. You can't hear him yet, over the noise of your thoughts.
AND I thank your brain for its input!"
ha ha ha
I'm in love with us: you, laughing and free.
Jun 25, 2012
Jun 25, 2012 at 3:06 AM UTC