to me, the Cartesian saying had to be relegated to shrapnel,
i treat the cogito
ergo sum
like i'd treat atoms, brushing and
signaturing each other with
a stabilised unification
under the name: helium, or hydrogen.
evidently that's also a term
for three dimensional space
and the cohorts of chaos that come
from it.
but something worries me,
intrinsically it's what i would simply
term: the automation of thinking.
basically? it's blood hard to stop thinking,
to do yoga to intricate being
in nothingness,
as Heidegger suggested:
non-being is a tier below nothing,
and i guess automated thinking
comes from non-being,
because there's this intrinsic manifestation
of instinct found in all sport activities
that doesn't allow thinking to take place,
no footballer thinks about his exertion
on the football pitch, no golfer maps
out a system of thought to *** the hole
in one...
some would even say
that thinking is a form of laziness,
i find that the whole notions turns
out to be a **** up affair of concern,
the mere notion that thought is automated
and cannot be barricaded against
its relentless battering our very being
is due to the fact that so many of us
do not attain the all that glitters is gold
particularity of fame...
it's not that we are doubtful,
but that we are mindful / thoughtful,
a few of us make it to the top of the sardine
can, but so many of us are minding
our own business on this placebo earthenware:
yes, i call this a placebo urn of things
needed (people always rave about nouns
anyway, call it slang, or whatever,
it trends, hashtags and the outdated
forms of phone numbers - calling big brother
eeny, meeny, miny, moe) - i could
swear it's so, but then again, maybe not so.
still (what a crass digression),
coming back to the Cartesian shrapnel...
basing in on weights and measures -
it's so tiny, that expression,
we can think the realistic
and only express a centimetre of the world,
we can be the realistic and only
express a centimetre of the world,
and then we can think the illusionary
and express a mile of the world,
and we can be the illusionary and express
a kilometre of the world:
toward the basis of fame and contentment of
the shadows...
yes, we have achieved a "death" of history,
by simply stating our recreational pursuits
being more important than our
need for historical eventuality and crisis, and change...
we have stated a "death" of history
via our population size, our ability to combat
diseases (whether infantile or of a certain maturity),
yes, we have established a congested world,
which facilitates nothing quite like a herd
(cattle mentality): hence the modern concern
for alienation... we're created a collective manifestation
of insects, or as one might suggest
this is yet another geocentric and heliocentric
concern for us... although relegated to
egocentric and the collective ethos of comrades -
but given the former has been eradicated
as it was previous known: communism -
in economic vocabulary it's all but gone,
but still exists in the sports: yet again,
the re-surfacing of abolishing automated thinking,
namely, automated collision with the daily
activity - either competitive or mundane,
as we all soon realised: if automated thinking
is not eradicated by automated doing
we end up mentally distraught -
our own thinking alienates us and even progresses
to symptoms that have no viability
concerning a drowning man, nonetheless
we're actually drowning.
i can hardly think that nothing is an abyss -
to me thought is an abyss (cat meows,
i write, the fermentation of wine goes on in
four jars to my left, bob, pop, bob, pop,
and daniel licht is playing to the fatty *****
that's my brain) -
i knew that ponderings ii - vi
would get my creative juices flowing:
finally! a book on philosophy that i can comprehend
within that bilingual complex i've established!
or: this much can be said upon
giving a supermarket cashier a signed copy of
my actually printed works
and hearing a compliment with eyes
waxed with glee (Tarah);
now i have 100 copies to push,
become akin to a drug dealer with poetry,
and that's not going to be easy
without p.r. and all that jingly marketing qualms.
still, what's there to be done
if not that there is something to be done,
even if it's nothing, or a pebble on a mountain:
which is why there is so much
potential in individuality, but also so much
angst - instead of doing crosswords we have
other riddles to be bothersome about,
but so few even get a ? to be concerned with.
again the Cartesian shrapnel equation,
so much is staged on it in terms
of how thinking becomes automated, robotic
to the point of making children succumb to
premature depression -
back when premature dementia was the hit
on Broadway or in an Estonian lunatic asylum
in the 19th century,
when we first received our psychiatric vocabulary,
now it's the young who are odd
and it is premature depression,
a bit like the black plague, against
all hopes, a single identifiable folly.
and where the best rewards?
solitude, where else?
for all that swindling of the talk of species
and competition within / without,
always one ******* says:
i am the zeitgeist - always one:
are there really benefits to realising that
****** equation? are there? to feel alive, to feel
conscious, or the madness of Nietzsche's reversal
stating that he's a thing that simply, exfoliates
necessary thought?
thought is primarily a moral ought -
the should i or shouldn't i?
it's intrinsic, inherent and simply: just there...
or in the unlikely event, a step into the abyss
and subsequent pathologies of the enabling of
a destruction of the soul: as manifestation
of a transgressively transcendent embodiment
of pure body.
so, against all duality, i simply fathom
that ****** thing as shrapnel,
curiously via (as i already might have said):
so much thinking doesn't precipitate into being,
and so much being doesn't precipitate into thinking -
or of those who adorn mental silk fabrics and Solomon rings,
and those who have to pay for elocution
lessons due to their ****** endeavours -
yet again, alignment with Thesaurus Rex,
cue: down Synonymous Avenue
because how many times are we sharpening
our narrative trying to feels less inclined
to exfoliate in the exotica of what's
the necessary verbiage, and escape into single
identifiable meanings, without poker, without politics,
without sexualised ambiguity?
for me language should work, not be desecrated
to fun: it, should, work;
or here i rest my ambitions,
without any poetic dogma - or to make poetry unrecognisable
when stated, for no reason to discredit
the systematics of poetry: but for reason
Kraken wrangler on language -
as much as Nietzsche might have said about
philosophical systems and their errors and lack of
honesty: i say as much about poetry careful to
be identified as such: metaphors, imagery blah blah -
all things that make people conscious of what
they're reading is actually what they're reading and say
it's poetry - as i said to the supermarket cashier:
enso (Japanese,
marcon purposively missing) - to write while standing up,
and so the reader is standing up,
not a novel you take to bed,
and read for months on end,
dozing off, or sneering at "uneducated" people
on the train...
i might as well be writing instruction
manuals for the sadistic training of ballerinas -
one cut, one incision, and get the **** out;
or at least that's the idea -
learn to spell, work on punctuation variations,
learn to tie your shoelaces... and don't believe in
the word edit.
