Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
"sophists" poems
What a misfortune, although you are made for fine and great works this unjust fate of yours always denies you encouragement and success; that base customs should block you; and pettiness and indifference. And how terrible the day when you yield (the day when you give up and yield), and you leave on foot for Susa, and you go to the monarch Artaxerxes who favorably places you in his court, and offers you satrapies and the like. And you accept them with despair these things that you do not want. Your soul seeks other things, weeps for other things; the praise of the public and the Sophists, the hard-won and inestimable Well Done; the Agora, the Theater, and the Laurels. How can Artaxerxes give you these, where will you find these in a satrapy; and what life can you live without these.
0
4.5k
The Satrapy
PHAEDRUS WHERE ARE YOU NOW? WITH GREY LOCKS AND LUCID MINDSET WHICH THE CRADLE ROCKS, WE KNOW YOU, LISTEN TO YOUR TREATISE DREAM, WHICH CAN NOT BE MET BY NOTHING AS IT SEEM; PLATO MADE YOU CRAWL WITH TRUMPETS BLAZI NG, LEFT YOU SPEECHLESS, STARING, ONLY GAZING AT WHAT WAS NOT THERE, GONE LIKE A LOST SONG, NOUGHT WAS THE SAME SINCE YOU CAME ALONG, AN AGEING INCUBUS WITH LITTLE TO ACHIEVE, YOU WOULD HAVE US ALL JUST WANTING TO BELIEVE, THE SOPHISTS WERE ALWAYS RIGHT BUT YOU WERE WRONG, ABOUT THINKING, ABOUT LIVING, ABOUT ANYTHING; THE CLASS LEFT FOR THE DAY HAPPY AT DEPRESSION, THERE WAS NOTHING BETTER THAN LISTENING TO YOUR LESSON.
0
Mar 14, 2016
Mar 14, 2016 at 6:57 PM UTC
AS IT WAS BEFORE
I don’t like knowing that there’s a YouTube channel out there for gun-nuts called “The Warrior Poets”. I’ve looked at some the videos. None of them have anything to do with poetry. I guess that’s okay, but, I still don’t have to like it, so I don’t. It does give me a reason to write down the fact that I believe that I, in fact, am a warrior-poet. My friends are too. John, Hans, Larry, Kristopher, and Josh… We’re a gang. We’re a conclave, a klatch of bare-knuckle sophists, street-wise surgeons of verse drunk on our own power. Beautiful bruises, pooled blood, split-lipped ripped pages broken pens shattered lenses. We’re the dogs of war. *** -JBClaywell © P&Z Publications 2019
0
Mar 11, 2019
Mar 11, 2019 at 5:14 PM UTC
Dogs of War
I'll tell you why I don't deserve to win because I really don't deserve to win I am the alpha and omega of failure seriously because if I've won, it means that someone, who was actually supposed to win, didn't If you think that I am the king of losers then you are wrong I lose even there it's true, losers have champions I'm not one of them I am the key to my downfall when clouds in summer pass by over head, it only rains on me even in the company of others with me this is the glory of my being, to deposit checks only to watch them bounce do not grow sympathetic towards my words, the fallacies of sophists are all the fad these days my poetry is quite literally a fluke, meant to soothe the boorish eyes and ears of those who don't know better simply, a child's rant to whoever is listening A tantrum unchecked fodder for credulous cattle, you will not buy my victory here would mean my destruction most certainly, the heartbreak of someone who has hoped for the opposite I, the tragic son of fate and loss, am destined to wed grief I beg you to see truth, not reason for if I deserve to lose and I don't, then let me win so I don't.
0
Jul 16, 2013
Jul 16, 2013 at 2:48 PM UTC
Sophism
Stupidly genius, moronic and shrewd people eat their fast food on fine China Failing is vertical, errors are slander Their gross insults impacting easy digestion Hyperbole falsehood messiah Piercingly silent and ardently soft people keep their opinions on fences Insults are weaponry not to be yielded Their platitudes cradling fragile personas Perversely destructive defences Classically learned and bookishly rich people carry their privilege with kindness Science is built with colonial scaffolds Their method constraining all true innovation Parochial qualified blindness Shockingly worthy and recklessly small people polish their boots with lead solder Gravity holding them grounded and upright Their bootlaces impacting aerodynamics Inferior sturdy upholder Gallantly serving and fearlessly trained people douse the political embers Fire escape blocked with hobnails and lumber Their pickaxes caught in the thick poison ivy Nugatory self-rule defenders The silent, the learned, the worthy, the trained people trade voyeurism for vision Hologram values are no longer trump cards Their gazes averted from hate-dripping sophists Integrity first coalition
0
Aug 15, 2024
Aug 15, 2024 at 4:53 AM UTC
Integrity first
sophists got empire under an eternal shower of frost ice the tired centaurs continue to opinion and fear their instruct useless, ineffective is near over jimmy tee Monday, October 21, 2013
0
Oct 21, 2013
Oct 21, 2013 at 9:41 PM UTC
the queen of roses
Lamb and sheep lay side by side and goes the earth below. Awake at rise of sun and skies because they do not know. That men do fight and **** and thrive on blood of other men. Of food and life, of grief and strive, no yield nor without bend. Through hills and lakes the nocturnes sound and still knowledge eludes. Or do they lie, not with their mouths, because they know the Truth. For they will live, and we will die; Cattle, their keep alive. And so they sleep, stories they tell themselves in bleat and baa. They do not speak of what they can’t, how true can sophists be. For with the sheep and lamb we lie, we lie to keep alive.
0
May 2, 2014
May 2, 2014 at 5:49 PM UTC
The Living
Under this beaten skin I can see a newer blueprint Waiting for the ashes Waiting some more crashes To wear a new face when it win They say easy come and easy go But I think it can't be real, tho I saw some decent public man in a game show And if karma is a ***** should we stop to vote? I am going away with a new disguise I am warning my friends before someone dies But the purple drank don't let they realize We can't trust anyone behind a ******* tie 'cause they are faking and smuggling 'till the Nobel Prize I see some fake-ass sophists at the morning show Droping mind over mind like a domino They could shave up their ***** to look like Foucault And keep their cynical smile while everyone blows The comedians were our source of truth Now they're offering jokes for a pair of fancy shoes People used to have band shirts, now they have tattoos We were brilliant, now we are just turning screws I am going away with a new disguise I am warning my friends before someone dies But the purple drank don't let they realize We can't trust anyone behind a ******* tie 'cause they are faking and smuggling 'till the Nobel Prize
0
Nov 30, 2020
Nov 30, 2020 at 11:20 AM UTC
Nobel Prize
In this entire world there is none to be trustworthy Near, dear ones are chained in their vested interests Every move is calculated to take all fruit of the tree Internally hypocrites portray externally the sophists Trust is a that rare commodity sold on need to fulfill Personal desires fully covered with just lust and greed Honesty is taken to the altar time and again is to **** Every relation is of need which in hatred brings bread Human have many faces of animals hidden in cover Their so called innocence is covered under the lust Throughout ones life one is never ever but to discover Because eyes are ***** and hearts are in complete dust Col Muhammad Khalid Khan Copyright 2016 Golden Glow
0
Jan 13, 2017
Jan 13, 2017 at 12:10 PM UTC
Under the Lust
well, sure, philosophers argue against the sophists, or what they deem: the art of rhetoric, the act of speaking persuasively - and that's grand, it really is... but then some sophist comes along, say antiphon, and he says: i have an argument against the anti-rhetoric of philosophers, i have an answer against thinkers. a sophist's argument against philosophers is tiny, like an atom, it's tiny, because it's but a single word; now words are atoms, and letters aren't, in the same way that chemists see elements as if atoms, and do not go beyond Fe (iron), Pb (lead), Xe (xeron) N (nitrogen) - because then their main endeavour is lost, as would be the case in metallurgy - i.e. there's nothing practical to do with the concept atom in their field; given the chemical alphabet of concerns and mandible parts is based on the system of elements - e.g. a + b + e + g + i = being alt. c + h + o (quantity of each) = ethanol (2c, 6h, 1o); oh i'm pretty sure sophists have an argument against philosophers, because what that argument is? a fucking thesaurus; that's what i've noticed philosophers do, they engage in applying thesaurus rex in their rhetoric... a sophist would apply rhetoric to mean one thing, but actually another, which is called subversion rather than rhetoric... he'll say one thing, but mean another, that's beyond rhetoric, that's subversion - that's how sophistry evolved over the years, rhetoric (a), sure, but "rhetoric" (b)? that's the art of subverting your eloquence at a persuasive argument; which leads into: **** sapiens? really? such a thing exists? i'm inclined into **** schizoi* - a split man, a multiplication of gemini. but why philosophers and a ****** thesaurus? well, they're using a rhetorical approach based on that ****** book, they're juggling their arguments via synonyms, they're not exactly genius alchemists in that respect, first they say concept, then they say idea, then they might say inspiration, or they then might say idealisation, and then they go bonkers and say talk about a chair, and say: chairness or chairiness they go beyond standard adjectives - and given that, look at the close proximity of what they're trying to say, and the nearest possible "puzzle", like the word: cheeriness; cheer, chair, cherry! trying to expand on the word chair can be rather misguiding, considering you can very literally have oak, and that's it! there really have to be literal cul de sac moments in philosophy, where a proper use of coherent language can become manifest; which alligns itself with the zeitgeist debacle of "proper" pronoun usage.
0
May 5, 2017
May 5, 2017 at 11:32 AM UTC
Antiphon's Answer
well, sure, philosophers argue against the sophists, or what they deem: the art of rhetoric, the act of speaking persuasively - and that's grand, it really is... but then some sophist comes along, say antiphon, and he says: i have an argument against the anti-rhetoric of philosophers, i have an answer against thinkers. a sophist's argument against philosophers is tiny, like an atom, it's tiny, because it's but a single word; now words are atoms, and letters aren't, in the same way that chemists see elements as if atoms, and do not go beyond Fe (iron), Pb (lead), Xe (xeron) N (nitrogen) - because then their main endeavour is lost, as would be the case in metallurgy - i.e. there's nothing practical to do with the concept atom in their field; given the chemical alphabet of concerns and mandible parts is based on the system of elements - e.g. a + b + e + g + i = being alt. c + h + o (quantity of each) = ethanol (2c, 6h, 1o); oh i'm pretty sure sophists have an argument against philosophers, because what that argument is? a fucking thesaurus; that's what i've noticed philosophers do, they engage in applying thesaurus rex in their rhetoric... a sophist would apply rhetoric to mean one thing, but actually another, which is called subversion rather than rhetoric... he'll say one thing, but mean another, that's beyond rhetoric, that's subversion - that's how sophistry evolved over the years, rhetoric (a), sure, but "rhetoric" (b)? that's the art of subverting your eloquence at a persuasive argument; which leads into: **** sapiens? really? such a thing exists? i'm inclined into **** schizoi* - a split man, a multiplication of gemini. but why philosophers and a ****** thesaurus? well, they're using a rhetorical approach based on that ****** book, they're juggling their arguments via synonyms, they're not exactly genius alchemists in that respect, first they say concept, then they say idea, then they might say inspiration, or they then might say idealisation, and then they go bonkers and say talk about a chair, and say: chairness or chairiness they go beyond standard adjectives - and given that, look at the close proximity of what they're trying to say, and the nearest possible "puzzle", like the word: cheeriness; cheer, chair, cherry! trying to expand on the word chair can be rather misguiding, considering you can very literally have oak, and that's it! there really have to be literal cul de sac moments in philosophy, where a proper use of coherent language can become manifest; which alligns itself with the zeitgeist debacle of "proper" pronoun usage.
Continue reading...
58
Pakistan ,Land of Pure A bouquet of very many ethnic flowers With their sincerity hospitality and morality With their high claims like high towers A blend of people from the village and city Land of lovers,sophists and the saints Right from Siachin down to the hot desert What a wonderful picture but it paints Austerity,solidarity and peace to be alert Against every heinous crime ***** design Of all those who carry hatred and contempt Strength of faith makes them but to define Their way of life makes them to but exempt Beautiful valleys and wonderful mountains Make it more beautiful as tourist attraction Water flows from natural sprinkling fountains To dominate the scenario but in every section Pakistan is the land of clean and pure to see Its my heart and my heart beat to but swing As a solider of the land I would but defend thee It isa chain of love bond from string to string Col Muhammad Khalid Khan Copyright 2018 Golden Glow
0
May 6, 2018
May 6, 2018 at 6:47 AM UTC
The Land of Pure
i am a heidegger apologist, in all honesty: i revere him;       and what could possibly be the reason?                       his reverence of poetry. in accordance with ezra - i too revere the art-form equally: in that i do not engage, in what, could be easily equated as sophistry; by saying that, what do i mean?              i am a practitioner of only one technique - bound to the seemingly never ageing, the truly never discarded   homer: in that, the same amulet of j. joyce's ulysses. hence, i am no believer in the talk of a protagoras of abdera, or a hippias of elis -                                       in that guise of sophistry we do encounter infantile poetry: a care for pun, a care for imagery, a care for metaphor; reference points that can easily take prestige in the colloquial.                           thus onto the prime point of reference with regard to: on reverence;                        NARRATIVE. - and indeed that is the only technique i value                 - it is that and, the very technical conceptualißations as thus staged, as i have already said, punctuation in words and between words.   thus? idle chit-chat       sparrow jargon cherubs of weak hearts this scholastic care for identifiers of said art,                     metaphor, pun           and whatever shrouds are in the possession of performers... sophists; in that, the basic concept of sophistry is it not simply rhyme? but how can this nail of a care's worth of technique, ever compare to the hammer of narration?
0
Apr 28, 2017
Apr 28, 2017 at 10:08 AM UTC
on reverence
i am a heidegger apologist, in all honesty: i revere him;       and what could possibly be the reason?                       his reverence of poetry. in accordance with ezra - i too revere the art-form equally: in that i do not engage, in what, could be easily equated as sophistry; by saying that, what do i mean?              i am a practitioner of only one technique - bound to the seemingly never ageing, the truly never discarded   homer: in that, the same amulet of j. joyce's ulysses. hence, i am no believer in the talk of a protagoras of abdera, or a hippias of elis -                                       in that guise of sophistry we do encounter infantile poetry: a care for pun, a care for imagery, a care for metaphor; reference points that can easily take prestige in the colloquial.                           thus onto the prime point of reference with regard to: on reverence;                        NARRATIVE. - and indeed that is the only technique i value                 - it is that and, the very technical conceptualißations as thus staged, as i have already said, punctuation in words and between words.   thus? idle chit-chat       sparrow jargon cherubs of weak hearts this scholastic care for identifiers of said art,                     metaphor, pun           and whatever shrouds are in the possession of performers... sophists; in that, the basic concept of sophistry is it not simply rhyme? but how can this nail of a care's worth of technique, ever compare to the hammer of narration?
Continue reading...
28