Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
"schematic" poems
.*i guess a loss of subscriptions is, somehow, a badge of honor, namely? i somehow managed to attach a screwdriver to my words... why? read below... English women consider motherhood to be a job... how ******* demeaning! gone are the days of womanhood attaining the stature of god, in the Christian methodology of encompassing the pivot of lady Madonna... perhaps a too high peddle-stool? i guess so... i'm not usurping the female status, but elevating a female stature, deeming motherhood an UNESCO status? seems it's too much... for some people... who make it necessary to befriend their shadow, and travel to the hinterlands.* just your atypical pedantry, a translator's subscript comment - who's richard rojcewicz's... regarding what? heidegger...        das volk,       and the three derivatives - volkhaft (populist),        volklich (communal) und?            völkisch (folkish) - i'm starting to suspect that i'm tapping in the all things folk.... unconsciously, favoring folk music...    see, us central europeans, we bunch together and share the most odd similarities -    i never thought that the song herr mannelig could be translated from Swedish - as it was translated into German... then again... Vikings founded Kiev... and all these loan-words of Germanic origin in Polish...     the only Anglo loan-word that i know of, is, weekend... hence, das volk, people -    by the way... German has "too many" definite articles,    and only one ein - or eine - is that the same rule as in Ęnglish? i.e. N                  in an example,    rather than in a counter example?    two vowels adjacent in separate word, sitting across from the grand chasm of... a spacing itch? but look at German, i never get it... DAS DIE DER...              is there an aesthetic difference, and only an aesthetic difference to mind?         bewildering... if there is such a thing as a western civilization...    that sometime     pompous obnoxiousness, fair enough... no problem:    but learn to hide it,            feel it, rather then feed it... it's not a question of a civilization, but more...     an answer to what is less civilization, and more... a chore... just like western women, notably the english women call motherhood a, "job"...                    it's a... wait... a job? doubt was big in classic philosophy of the Cartesian schematic... so no one knows that the French existentialists brought in negation,     as the driving force to replace doubt?               who the hell sees doubt these days?     either the know it alles - or the hush-hush crowd...            motherhood is a... job? well... then i guess, being a man... western civilization, by that standard of logic...    can't be anything more...    than a.... ******* chore!
0
Aug 14, 2018
Aug 14, 2018 at 8:33 AM UTC
das volk (translator's note)
.*i guess a loss of subscriptions is, somehow, a badge of honor, namely? i somehow managed to attach a screwdriver to my words... why? read below... English women consider motherhood to be a job... how ******* demeaning! gone are the days of womanhood attaining the stature of god, in the Christian methodology of encompassing the pivot of lady Madonna... perhaps a too high peddle-stool? i guess so... i'm not usurping the female status, but elevating a female stature, deeming motherhood an UNESCO status? seems it's too much... for some people... who make it necessary to befriend their shadow, and travel to the hinterlands.* just your atypical pedantry, a translator's subscript comment - who's richard rojcewicz's... regarding what? heidegger...        das volk,       and the three derivatives - volkhaft (populist),        volklich (communal) und?            völkisch (folkish) - i'm starting to suspect that i'm tapping in the all things folk.... unconsciously, favoring folk music...    see, us central europeans, we bunch together and share the most odd similarities -    i never thought that the song herr mannelig could be translated from Swedish - as it was translated into German... then again... Vikings founded Kiev... and all these loan-words of Germanic origin in Polish...     the only Anglo loan-word that i know of, is, weekend... hence, das volk, people -    by the way... German has "too many" definite articles,    and only one ein - or eine - is that the same rule as in Ęnglish? i.e. N                  in an example,    rather than in a counter example?    two vowels adjacent in separate word, sitting across from the grand chasm of... a spacing itch? but look at German, i never get it... DAS DIE DER...              is there an aesthetic difference, and only an aesthetic difference to mind?         bewildering... if there is such a thing as a western civilization...    that sometime     pompous obnoxiousness, fair enough... no problem:    but learn to hide it,            feel it, rather then feed it... it's not a question of a civilization, but more...     an answer to what is less civilization, and more... a chore... just like western women, notably the english women call motherhood a, "job"...                    it's a... wait... a job? doubt was big in classic philosophy of the Cartesian schematic... so no one knows that the French existentialists brought in negation,     as the driving force to replace doubt?               who the hell sees doubt these days?     either the know it alles - or the hush-hush crowd...            motherhood is a... job? well... then i guess, being a man... western civilization, by that standard of logic...    can't be anything more...    than a.... ******* chore!
Continue reading...
77
i seem to only see three constellations in the night sky these days... the modo - it be the sign of: the age of scorpio, there's but the big & little dipper (respectively) º                º                       º                               º                                                             º                                   º                                                      º do these people really need to be spoon fed? the smaller dipper is akin to the big dipper, hence to write in the other and last constellation (minus that odd rhombus without a name) -   and believe me when i say: orthodox astrology doesn't agree with me:                           º                        º                     º                        º                          º                                        º                          º   i guess i managed to draw the right schematic,    besides the point, there are but three constellations in the night sky around here, and one is a revisionist take on the scorpio... **** you hippies, and your age of aquarius,      this is what a scorpion looks like, and nothing what you've indicated, i'm starting to think that astrologists did poorly in geometry class... but i'll end it on a positive note...       *there is more dignity in being ascribed an epitaph, than being given a "proper" burial...* and by "proper" i mean: the leech family members waiting for inheritance,   the sycophantic actors of attendance - throw me into a mass grave, i don't mind for a "proper" burial...    there is no dignity in whatever burial ensues as many will do... but allow man to transcend the date of birth ** / yy / zz and the date of death zz / yy / ** with an epitaph...         however "wise" the man was in life, his dignity only arrives postmortem, in the form of an epitaph... but one epitaph overshadows a thousand quotable mentions of the man, when alive, but one epitaph of a david, overcomes the oeuvre of maxims of a goliath.      whatever argument for light pollution exists, even when in the scottish highlands i didn't see any more stars...   there are only three constellations in play on the night sky,   and one of them is the genuine scorpio constellation, with the orthodox constellation being bogus, fake, unnecessary... i, i've spotted the constellation of scorpio, and i did so: with my naked eyes!
0
Oct 12, 2017
Oct 12, 2017 at 8:21 PM UTC
modo tribus constellatio / tempus ex scorpio
i seem to only see three constellations in the night sky these days... the modo - it be the sign of: the age of scorpio, there's but the big & little dipper (respectively) º                º                       º                               º                                                             º                                   º                                                      º do these people really need to be spoon fed? the smaller dipper is akin to the big dipper, hence to write in the other and last constellation (minus that odd rhombus without a name) -   and believe me when i say: orthodox astrology doesn't agree with me:                           º                        º                     º                        º                          º                                        º                          º   i guess i managed to draw the right schematic,    besides the point, there are but three constellations in the night sky around here, and one is a revisionist take on the scorpio... **** you hippies, and your age of aquarius,      this is what a scorpion looks like, and nothing what you've indicated, i'm starting to think that astrologists did poorly in geometry class... but i'll end it on a positive note...       *there is more dignity in being ascribed an epitaph, than being given a "proper" burial...* and by "proper" i mean: the leech family members waiting for inheritance,   the sycophantic actors of attendance - throw me into a mass grave, i don't mind for a "proper" burial...    there is no dignity in whatever burial ensues as many will do... but allow man to transcend the date of birth ** / yy / zz and the date of death zz / yy / ** with an epitaph...         however "wise" the man was in life, his dignity only arrives postmortem, in the form of an epitaph... but one epitaph overshadows a thousand quotable mentions of the man, when alive, but one epitaph of a david, overcomes the oeuvre of maxims of a goliath.      whatever argument for light pollution exists, even when in the scottish highlands i didn't see any more stars...   there are only three constellations in play on the night sky,   and one of them is the genuine scorpio constellation, with the orthodox constellation being bogus, fake, unnecessary... i, i've spotted the constellation of scorpio, and i did so: with my naked eyes!
Continue reading...
67
Passover or Easter or Happy Any Ole Thing, Sam I Am she asks me good naturedly which to wish me - a happy this or that and a poem’s immaculate conception is instant arisen arising hot **** rueful smile and unruly reply a solid out loud Ha! neither either or he writes and so believes for I am a god loving man, whom we’ve -Him/It/Me have agreed that I may call Sam I Am and the answer to your question is why not for most quests and questions can be well-answered why not! my genes my historical beings my ancestors and my issue all declaiming that I am a jew who left egypt, no defaming, a slave to no man who cannot love another like his own self but some in all that I write, this deity boss slips in quietly unseen in one of his jokes-on-us-disguises like singing ave maria and thus whose to say his rightful name, is not Sam I Am my choice and the big D      (a self-employed informal his choice, nom-de-guerre) has agreed via his acknowledgement in his normative style of low volume taciturn tacit acceptance so wish me a u happy anything you want-to-call-it-day don’t matter. but know this u were there when, all on that happy day where, @ the manger, when this Sam-Approved-Appeared poem was born and Sam blessed it with a hot **** she laughs, tosses back in my face, some schematic I prior penned that I can’t recall the when or where or my nom-de-guerre employed but fits this ex-slave perfectly “there are no lines or lies in my writings there are no definitions and perception is only your truth”
0
Apr 1, 2018
Apr 1, 2018 at 12:22 PM UTC
Passover or Easter or Happy Any Ole Thing, Sam I Am
Passover or Easter or Happy Any Ole Thing, Sam I Am she asks me good naturedly which to wish me - a happy this or that and a poem’s immaculate conception is instant arisen arising hot **** rueful smile and unruly reply a solid out loud Ha! neither either or he writes and so believes for I am a god loving man, whom we’ve -Him/It/Me have agreed that I may call Sam I Am and the answer to your question is why not for most quests and questions can be well-answered why not! my genes my historical beings my ancestors and my issue all declaiming that I am a jew who left egypt, no defaming, a slave to no man who cannot love another like his own self but some in all that I write, this deity boss slips in quietly unseen in one of his jokes-on-us-disguises like singing ave maria and thus whose to say his rightful name, is not Sam I Am my choice and the big D      (a self-employed informal his choice, nom-de-guerre) has agreed via his acknowledgement in his normative style of low volume taciturn tacit acceptance so wish me a u happy anything you want-to-call-it-day don’t matter. but know this u were there when, all on that happy day where, @ the manger, when this Sam-Approved-Appeared poem was born and Sam blessed it with a hot **** she laughs, tosses back in my face, some schematic I prior penned that I can’t recall the when or where or my nom-de-guerre employed but fits this ex-slave perfectly “there are no lines or lies in my writings there are no definitions and perception is only your truth”
Continue reading...
40
Polished off the filler rods now lifes got me dreaming soley about the silver lining the spooning of the woman on the moon Keep mapping the schematic, the big move heading straight to the oil soaked cash Ready again to make the great dash This time I'll save my dimes for those unavoidable hard times I'll pile it under my matress a secrete stash thats all mine Work my *** to the bone by welding up a storm Sitting all leathered up on my light weaver throne To meditate and consentrate on 13 times the suns bright Keep the eyes focused and fixate count to ten when the mechanics frustrate Troubleshoot the lines of life fix the issue then collect the lute.
0
Dec 18, 2011
Dec 18, 2011 at 6:14 PM UTC
Welders rhyme
man leisured by the least obliging functioning of what he terms “proper” manual endeavours of the biceps will clearly resolve the matter being his last adventure that’s consumerism, creating as many menial jobs as possible without the freedom to enjoy hardish and the elements; but of course man’s life will become easier, but his adventure seeking will simply become a zoology, a safari, a safety netting - consumerism is hardly an adventure, it’s a bicycle schematic: one wheel produces, another wheel consumes; most of the jobs under the hammer were not menial, they became menial only when heidegger’s hammer was involved and the rebellion came when hammering nails in turned into discussing philosophy; it’s hard to commence an emergence of philosophy window shopping, woman’s new kitchen area: you know how many marriages i have seen fail because of over-cooked pasta? too many. you know how many glass houses i’ve seen constructed by women peering into shop windows at mannequins? too many. i sometimes think about sartre’s c.c.t.v. voyeurism pervasive in english society alongside paedophilia, and i guess the jigsaw parts fit... they do; once dubbed the nation of shopkeepers, now dubbed the nation of integrally ~foreign mortgage lenders (nation of property developers / landlords... indeed, once a nation of shopkeepers, now a nation of landlords): or a nation re-evaluating communism by importing slavs to talk of the ups and lows of communism by trying to curb capitalistic egoism and turn it into a collective without communism’s egoism father stalin:                             or queen bee or queen ant china.
0
Jan 19, 2016
Jan 19, 2016 at 8:08 PM UTC
nation of shopkeepers turned into a nation of landlords
man leisured by the least obliging functioning of what he terms “proper” manual endeavours of the biceps will clearly resolve the matter being his last adventure that’s consumerism, creating as many menial jobs as possible without the freedom to enjoy hardish and the elements; but of course man’s life will become easier, but his adventure seeking will simply become a zoology, a safari, a safety netting - consumerism is hardly an adventure, it’s a bicycle schematic: one wheel produces, another wheel consumes; most of the jobs under the hammer were not menial, they became menial only when heidegger’s hammer was involved and the rebellion came when hammering nails in turned into discussing philosophy; it’s hard to commence an emergence of philosophy window shopping, woman’s new kitchen area: you know how many marriages i have seen fail because of over-cooked pasta? too many. you know how many glass houses i’ve seen constructed by women peering into shop windows at mannequins? too many. i sometimes think about sartre’s c.c.t.v. voyeurism pervasive in english society alongside paedophilia, and i guess the jigsaw parts fit... they do; once dubbed the nation of shopkeepers, now dubbed the nation of integrally ~foreign mortgage lenders (nation of property developers / landlords... indeed, once a nation of shopkeepers, now a nation of landlords): or a nation re-evaluating communism by importing slavs to talk of the ups and lows of communism by trying to curb capitalistic egoism and turn it into a collective without communism’s egoism father stalin:                             or queen bee or queen ant china.
Continue reading...
34
every time i travel to Warsaw i fall in love, i stand on the central Warsaw train-station, and there's this girl checking her mobile interet, phone, and she looks pretty... and... i really don't want to **** her like the guys **** her in ***** movies... maybe that''s shy i'm considered "effeminate".... maybe...                   i just didn't **** enough women... or maybe... i speak the tongue of the crusaders... but we sent the artillery... the beautiful women to the Arab ******             and kept the nation safe... Islam, akin to the comparison of the Bubonic Plague... Islam... virus of the mind...     i'll contest thi... i'll ******* die for this... i've been feeling weird for the past few days.... Tom Petty died....   so... why would anyone give a **** if Wayne Static does the coffer?    so... i'm supposed to care?! **** you! Jeff hanneman died... but do you see me, making a case for a ******* parade?! no? good... that's how i like it... ******* south London plonker! every single time... i fall in love with a girl at the central train-station in Warsaw... the love dies a sudden death... when i get to the.... Western train station of Warsaw...   the Ukrainians et al... the Mongols...              love's up, dead, long gone...                          i'm basically living the enterprise in re-experiencing a slow death...     feral lands...   these Polacks are like... please don't land in Warsaw.... i know... Krakow has Auschwitz as a tourist destination... but... but... you will not see the generic schematic of globalization... every time i travel to Warsaw i fall in love, and then i think of "it"... **** marriage..                no thanks, you have it covered...                                            on your way; i might not be on the winning side, but sure as **** i'm also not on the losing side either... and t think... that i could even concise my life within the confines of imitating my father...    i could have...                    but then... life... isn't exactly a chance on bet within the confines of a roulette.
0
Oct 15, 2018
Oct 15, 2018 at 9:54 PM UTC
every time i travel to Warsaw i fall in love
every time i travel to Warsaw i fall in love, i stand on the central Warsaw train-station, and there's this girl checking her mobile interet, phone, and she looks pretty... and... i really don't want to **** her like the guys **** her in ***** movies... maybe that''s shy i'm considered "effeminate".... maybe...                   i just didn't **** enough women... or maybe... i speak the tongue of the crusaders... but we sent the artillery... the beautiful women to the Arab ******             and kept the nation safe... Islam, akin to the comparison of the Bubonic Plague... Islam... virus of the mind...     i'll contest thi... i'll ******* die for this... i've been feeling weird for the past few days.... Tom Petty died....   so... why would anyone give a **** if Wayne Static does the coffer?    so... i'm supposed to care?! **** you! Jeff hanneman died... but do you see me, making a case for a ******* parade?! no? good... that's how i like it... ******* south London plonker! every single time... i fall in love with a girl at the central train-station in Warsaw... the love dies a sudden death... when i get to the.... Western train station of Warsaw...   the Ukrainians et al... the Mongols...              love's up, dead, long gone...                          i'm basically living the enterprise in re-experiencing a slow death...     feral lands...   these Polacks are like... please don't land in Warsaw.... i know... Krakow has Auschwitz as a tourist destination... but... but... you will not see the generic schematic of globalization... every time i travel to Warsaw i fall in love, and then i think of "it"... **** marriage..                no thanks, you have it covered...                                            on your way; i might not be on the winning side, but sure as **** i'm also not on the losing side either... and t think... that i could even concise my life within the confines of imitating my father...    i could have...                    but then... life... isn't exactly a chance on bet within the confines of a roulette.
Continue reading...
76
my replacing takes part by small designs. displacements accumulate, until some day you look out the window or breathe to check you're still alive; and, like that, this weight will be gone. this burden, effortlessly dissipating. this lament reaches from all hollows. 'cause you only reap from seeds sown, right? it never rained once. you know, though, i, likewise, never threw a single one down, and instead just bit my tongue, carrying out schematic emptinesses. these hollows fill out and encompass the entire world; at the focus of everything, i act out absolutes and do nothing at all. these new fields still look burnt. i still turn soil, hoping for salvation. what if it rains? will i cope? will i drown?
0
Nov 28, 2013
Nov 28, 2013 at 4:51 AM UTC
sapphire
Is schismatic schematic prophetic problematic differences a future world to be unscholarly resolved with arms? Heresy, is an accusation that requires hanging, not just participles, but participants, let us tear apart the baby, give me half and you, can scrape the pavements. I see , no communion, no Democracy, no theologian or Cleric, no Christ, no Buddha, or Mohammed, coming to our rescue. No one says, this is craziness, totally religious schismatic I may be. But, give me an alternative. I cry, today.
0
Oct 26, 2014
Oct 26, 2014 at 8:31 PM UTC
Alternative
ᚠ Φ F Θ ᚦ no explanations exist within a geometry outside the circle, only architecture, sole, yet the sole geometry of architecture is an encircling, a lifting, and had i wrote my poetry in the comfort of rising beyond Marx is socio-political schematic i would, but i rather talk to scaffolders than to poets, i'd rip my heart through enough thin veil to prove it so that i shared an entombing of lips wholly bodied with one! i rather! care for this ******* Parisian princess in your divorce as best you can... i kept a cat for seven years before my neighbour decided it was time to ***** affection to an animal neither tilling for ably feeding to instead choose his daughter as my wife: i rejected feeling no compass of conversation... the cat died, i went into the graveyard and dug a gravestone out and buried my cat in the moonlight: don't ever come across me and my pet! you killed half the intelligence that was me! **** you! humanity engaging with humanity it plagiarises as itself an ownership to suit puppet strings like it might tailoring, POLAND ****** EUROPE! POLAND ****** EUROPE! POST COLONIAL NATIONS SEEK NEW ******* TO CRAFT THE LOST COTTON BUDS INTO GRANULE CEMENT SET! POLAND ****** EUROPE! POLAND ****** EUROPE! POLAND ****** EUROPE! POLAND ****** EUROPE! MAMA RUSSIA! PAPA PRUSSIA! HOSANNA! HOSANNA! LAUREL LEAFS AS I SAT ON THEM! THE CROWN OF KING TU-154... ROMANIA DONKEY DON QUIXOTE! WHOOP WHOOP! WHOOP WHOOP GREK IZLAND CORFU! then the postman comes with my jealousy as within reach of hope to attain old age... (snigger)... i hope i don't... i want million dollar baby's truth to wake me.
0
May 31, 2016
May 31, 2016 at 8:04 PM UTC
square / imploded pentagon
ᚠ Φ F Θ ᚦ no explanations exist within a geometry outside the circle, only architecture, sole, yet the sole geometry of architecture is an encircling, a lifting, and had i wrote my poetry in the comfort of rising beyond Marx is socio-political schematic i would, but i rather talk to scaffolders than to poets, i'd rip my heart through enough thin veil to prove it so that i shared an entombing of lips wholly bodied with one! i rather! care for this ******* Parisian princess in your divorce as best you can... i kept a cat for seven years before my neighbour decided it was time to ***** affection to an animal neither tilling for ably feeding to instead choose his daughter as my wife: i rejected feeling no compass of conversation... the cat died, i went into the graveyard and dug a gravestone out and buried my cat in the moonlight: don't ever come across me and my pet! you killed half the intelligence that was me! **** you! humanity engaging with humanity it plagiarises as itself an ownership to suit puppet strings like it might tailoring, POLAND ****** EUROPE! POLAND ****** EUROPE! POST COLONIAL NATIONS SEEK NEW ******* TO CRAFT THE LOST COTTON BUDS INTO GRANULE CEMENT SET! POLAND ****** EUROPE! POLAND ****** EUROPE! POLAND ****** EUROPE! POLAND ****** EUROPE! MAMA RUSSIA! PAPA PRUSSIA! HOSANNA! HOSANNA! LAUREL LEAFS AS I SAT ON THEM! THE CROWN OF KING TU-154... ROMANIA DONKEY DON QUIXOTE! WHOOP WHOOP! WHOOP WHOOP GREK IZLAND CORFU! then the postman comes with my jealousy as within reach of hope to attain old age... (snigger)... i hope i don't... i want million dollar baby's truth to wake me.
Continue reading...
45
Rebellious minds wander through enlightenment With new found insight into a deeper understanding An illuminated sense of self - disguised in complexity Stroking our ego's with a persuasive fascination Gutless contrarians thriving off schematic exceptions Objecting to proposals is all that seems formidable Double edged intellect embracing it's own prevarication Claiming supremacy as the better half of the equation One more plagiarized thought to dwell on Re-occurrence of Ideals in plain lucidity Come crawling forth from the genetic sea To stain our mind with a rhetorical monotony Monolithic horizons expanding out of view A facade of a paradise - lost in a new weary age These frail structures collapse and rebuild reclaiming everything that we once had known
0
Jun 3, 2013
Jun 3, 2013 at 7:11 PM UTC
Undead Poet
*call me twisted, but i’ve always admired a certain degree of controversy. complexity is a dangerous beauty, like a hurricane - admired from afar, deadly up close. my biggest fear was always photocopiers. monotonous carbon copies, binge feeding on Christmas music and cold commercialized coffee. simplicity was schematic, intricacy was ****** with a quivering hand and downcast eyes, i clothed myself in these layers. gift-wrapped, with a ‘danger’ sign as a gift card, i became an enigma to myself. diamond rings came with dark clouds, locks and keys gave way to gun shots and bullet wounds. fairytales were never meant for the 3-d world. none of us are “fated” for a happy ending. riding off into the sunset only comes with hard work and hard lessons. yes, i may still be an overthinker. i may still have more thoughts than i have time to put them in. mundane things are still transfigured into tainted, disfigured imitations of insecurity, agonising and mental mutilation. but it does not have to be this way. pick up a pair of 2-d glasses. you don’t have to see the world in technicolor. sometimes monochrome lenses do tinge the world in shades of nostalgia, clarity, and hope. peel off those layers. you may cry, but cry of catharsis. it may sting, but salt always does. wear simplicity as your sail, rose-tinted with trust and a silent knowing. you may realise that what you were always looking for was always right beside you.*
0
Nov 28, 2016
Nov 28, 2016 at 9:27 PM UTC
a call
Replicated "t" square, heated and manipulated to match a hand drawn schematic, eye-balled and transferred to a soiled napkin two days prior. Recovery spent melee inspired by whispered breath. Kin to wind, multi- colored marshmallows, or hard candies that have been rewrapped quickly and shuffled to the bottom of the bag. Periscope ala multi-limbed, e.g. tentacular. Rain spun abundant large geometric insect eyes radiating opalescent transit; here and there, over or under, stop and go, when = then, two - days - life - end. Glowing hand, darkest white light in a vacant space. All secrets hidden with trust, imagination, and neglect; recalling memories for those who live to forget. Like a hunger fed plentifully followed by a playful belch aloud for honor and comfort. Later, the indulgence calls and abdominal gases produce an acidic truth that burns the memory back into awareness. Flush it away now! Get rid of it quickly. There is no time to respect the whole past, only that which allows performance to continue uninterrupted. Tuck those memories away deeper this time; the ***** will drown you before it drowns them. Laying around and crying aloud won't pay the bills; if nothing else remember, a good American is a good consumer and a good consumer never wastes time getting to know themselves when the alternative is television.
0
Oct 4, 2012
Oct 4, 2012 at 6:46 AM UTC
Ducking Under the Psyche
Conjecturing on the intimate remnants of your heart surmising on the proper way to dissect its parts delving into the chasm that holds your most private illusions of grandeur bewildered by the vast expanses, these weathered lips simply stammer the complexity of the concept left me stifled, mouth failing to make any attempts at offering kind words as the reverberations of vocal chords became the only sound we heard ricocheting off the precipices of your heart's unsurmountable walls useless like hands digging the sands in fruitless attempts to draw the full force off the ocean from a shallow hole I stared at the blueprints of your heart's desires failing to find the control every route on the schematic seemed as if inner city traffic flooded with passengers never fulling knowing when they will reach their destination rightfully so, at the center of your attention as I sketch out the dimensions factoring in the time it will take to find the route that leads me back to you I marvel at the resiliency of your heart, then drive straight through beyond these hallowed walls lies a future I was destined to reach I shred these maps, light a match and burn all the blueprints of me...
0
Feb 21, 2013
Feb 21, 2013 at 12:53 AM UTC
Blueprints
the less money I make, the more I give away... need to get cured, need me some cure, to keep my money in my Persian silk sow purse, so when enfeebled, can pay a nurse to wipe my drooling chin need me some curmudgeon herbs to get rid of this happy insanity cure this ****** mudge, from giving away his green fudge, so when doing his sleepy-eyed sums, the tallying up, the counting down did he qualify, as a good ole one, his conscience busy unconsciously, anudging, adjudging, to see if the boyo can sleep better this night. So when he meets the maker, He won't say hey faker, but fakir, magic maker, dervish swayer and *"you my kind of poet, let's make us some smiling mischievous trouble, give away whatever it takes, love potions number nine, winning lottery tickets for everyone, you and me, scheming schematic crazy man poet and god, to make it happy-en."*
0
Oct 10, 2014
Oct 10, 2014 at 3:30 PM UTC
God's Cure-mudgeon
Through the glaze of snow falling from ninety-nine cent aluminium, we'd taken the remains of a novel formulation to remove the stars from the sky and plant them in a field. I took crushing endlessness and the heat of leaves growing in moments to make the autumn of a town I hadn't yet seen. This is how I escaped from the sealed-elevator flight plan the first time; talking had failed me, pinned against the face of a fleeing infant. His mother could never find a way to paint him as a forgery, a skeleton, and make it stick, so he coughed rough and eloped from the schematic with his brother as their father remained on the ground, paying out the parking lot tower fees, unaware that he, himself, was only a figment. and I, just another figment, ventured off into the village, the leaves cascading and trembling, the gold of their hues dissipating as the flight crew shook a lifeless husk, spent lives ago, now, with the clamour of shells dividing, each split or junction or birth yielding arcs of light as my sister tells me how the strings she pulls around her wrists tell metric time whilst I brush my hand against concrete and glass, leaving traces of skin within the grain, sloughing away finally in the small moments as I float through an antique dealership: mahogany gods, carved tall as redwoods, and bathed in mist like the western coast at dawn. and I, indifferent to the television sets implanted between memories, broadcasting coffee-stain eyes lost midsummer years ago, still indifferent. as I finally reach the elevator, the last level, the depth below, struck me. I am the test subject, my irrealities are just trying to get out, to survive this feigned life, to be born into the world I frequent. They are abstractions and know it. I have not said a word as I step out onto that plane, amidst the rising roar of engines and the row of the crowds and the swell of my emptiness. I breathe in and become the field, at last.
0
Mar 16, 2013
Mar 16, 2013 at 1:02 AM UTC
reverie 11/03
Through the glaze of snow falling from ninety-nine cent aluminium, we'd taken the remains of a novel formulation to remove the stars from the sky and plant them in a field. I took crushing endlessness and the heat of leaves growing in moments to make the autumn of a town I hadn't yet seen. This is how I escaped from the sealed-elevator flight plan the first time; talking had failed me, pinned against the face of a fleeing infant. His mother could never find a way to paint him as a forgery, a skeleton, and make it stick, so he coughed rough and eloped from the schematic with his brother as their father remained on the ground, paying out the parking lot tower fees, unaware that he, himself, was only a figment. and I, just another figment, ventured off into the village, the leaves cascading and trembling, the gold of their hues dissipating as the flight crew shook a lifeless husk, spent lives ago, now, with the clamour of shells dividing, each split or junction or birth yielding arcs of light as my sister tells me how the strings she pulls around her wrists tell metric time whilst I brush my hand against concrete and glass, leaving traces of skin within the grain, sloughing away finally in the small moments as I float through an antique dealership: mahogany gods, carved tall as redwoods, and bathed in mist like the western coast at dawn. and I, indifferent to the television sets implanted between memories, broadcasting coffee-stain eyes lost midsummer years ago, still indifferent. as I finally reach the elevator, the last level, the depth below, struck me. I am the test subject, my irrealities are just trying to get out, to survive this feigned life, to be born into the world I frequent. They are abstractions and know it. I have not said a word as I step out onto that plane, amidst the rising roar of engines and the row of the crowds and the swell of my emptiness. I breathe in and become the field, at last.
Continue reading...
5
there’s usually two ways of writing an abstract like one might have written one for a chemistry experiment, a debriefing, a plot summary as you might have it, although in philosophy it’s either geometric of algebraic, to take into account a chance meeting between sartre (b) and descartes (a) i can only utilise the algebraic in a framework of a platonic schematic, i.e. dialogue, and since dialogue then casually, in conversation, like so: example no. 1 (exercise of good faith) (a) i think i had      a brain haemorrhage                                                                (b) i doubt it. example no. 2 (exercise of bad faith) (b) i had       a brain haemorrhage                                                                (a) how do you know?                                                                      (i.e. i’ll deny this statement.) it really is as simple as that, after all, all the ball of wool untangling in the standard philosophy books is meddled at times, it is hard to craft an entry of a decent dialogue without the one-sided stance of monologues that fill the pages of books, but take any major tenet of the two philosopher’s works and set a scene of two buddies talking in a pub, and that’s you having skipped the best 200 pages of untimely meditations and about 400 pages of being and nothingness - not out of rudeness but on the simple basis: **** i understood it! so if anything can be relevant in modern philosophy, and that’s modern from 17th century to the present era it is only relevant when applying a platonic schematic, because it has to be talked about, and when talked about simplified, because why would anyone want to over-complicate and apply an aristotelian schematic of inspection by writing very crude philosophies by the simple process of over-complicating the thinking process as that, which does not necessarily need thought attached to it - like at present, with western society debasing any original theology by forcing all the ills of the world as the adequate justification... the origin of this, you will find, is not from the people who suffer as such, but from people who are safe, healthy and satiated with adequate materialism, the kind to have a very english middle-class sentimentality to care for whimsical sensibilities, prudences and etiquette in general, that's how placebo atheism works, it's still a ****** theology, the real atheists? hmm, guess... the list is pretty dramatic in the way they approached coupling freedom and will and others - that's why i prefer my invention of coupling a placebo effect with atheism... rather than writing out a theology of absence - look... here's a trick: a theology of indefinite absence (a) / theology of definite absence (the), and then the ism from empiricism.
0
Oct 22, 2015
Oct 22, 2015 at 8:43 AM UTC
footnote to the four pillars of post-existentialism
there’s usually two ways of writing an abstract like one might have written one for a chemistry experiment, a debriefing, a plot summary as you might have it, although in philosophy it’s either geometric of algebraic, to take into account a chance meeting between sartre (b) and descartes (a) i can only utilise the algebraic in a framework of a platonic schematic, i.e. dialogue, and since dialogue then casually, in conversation, like so: example no. 1 (exercise of good faith) (a) i think i had      a brain haemorrhage                                                                (b) i doubt it. example no. 2 (exercise of bad faith) (b) i had       a brain haemorrhage                                                                (a) how do you know?                                                                      (i.e. i’ll deny this statement.) it really is as simple as that, after all, all the ball of wool untangling in the standard philosophy books is meddled at times, it is hard to craft an entry of a decent dialogue without the one-sided stance of monologues that fill the pages of books, but take any major tenet of the two philosopher’s works and set a scene of two buddies talking in a pub, and that’s you having skipped the best 200 pages of untimely meditations and about 400 pages of being and nothingness - not out of rudeness but on the simple basis: **** i understood it! so if anything can be relevant in modern philosophy, and that’s modern from 17th century to the present era it is only relevant when applying a platonic schematic, because it has to be talked about, and when talked about simplified, because why would anyone want to over-complicate and apply an aristotelian schematic of inspection by writing very crude philosophies by the simple process of over-complicating the thinking process as that, which does not necessarily need thought attached to it - like at present, with western society debasing any original theology by forcing all the ills of the world as the adequate justification... the origin of this, you will find, is not from the people who suffer as such, but from people who are safe, healthy and satiated with adequate materialism, the kind to have a very english middle-class sentimentality to care for whimsical sensibilities, prudences and etiquette in general, that's how placebo atheism works, it's still a ****** theology, the real atheists? hmm, guess... the list is pretty dramatic in the way they approached coupling freedom and will and others - that's why i prefer my invention of coupling a placebo effect with atheism... rather than writing out a theology of absence - look... here's a trick: a theology of indefinite absence (a) / theology of definite absence (the), and then the ism from empiricism.
Continue reading...
52
All thoughts are individual. It is impossible to take the energy and apparatus to which that energy is transferred through to develop a thought. Therefore no knowledge is taken, all is perceived to wit a schematic and the apparatus developed by our brains to develop the thought. The thought is then subjected to the body and undergoes scrutiny to provide a relevance, priority and application. Therefore it would be safe to assume that all knowledge is neither subjective nor objective but an entirely new word that could exemplify itself as "Understood as developed by ones own." Where I got this schematic for this idea was in counterance to the percieved robbing of thoughts and ideas from books and ideas. Would it be proper to call it the same thought? No. Would it be proper to call it a reaction? Only in the most mechanical of senses that is cause following effect. This idea would be to liken to a computer having a file copied from one machine to another, while the content remains the same in its physical interpretation on the screen would completely change. As if being opened by two seperate programs. And we are not talking about the files being the same when we talk about ideas, ideas are consequences of what is perceived therefore consequences of the that is copied. Ideas are the effect and in their way, an individual interpretation by how the schematic of an idea is followed by what is transferred. This idea in itself makes up for the massive hurdle that is misunderstanding between two people, each hearing fundamentally the same things while producing two differing ideas. In summation, an idea is a scrutinized original built on the schematic of that which is perceived and is each independent of a person and their surroundings.
0
Jan 15, 2017
Jan 15, 2017 at 1:20 AM UTC
Ah.. Stuff I write when I'm sad and profound.
All thoughts are individual. It is impossible to take the energy and apparatus to which that energy is transferred through to develop a thought. Therefore no knowledge is taken, all is perceived to wit a schematic and the apparatus developed by our brains to develop the thought. The thought is then subjected to the body and undergoes scrutiny to provide a relevance, priority and application. Therefore it would be safe to assume that all knowledge is neither subjective nor objective but an entirely new word that could exemplify itself as "Understood as developed by ones own." Where I got this schematic for this idea was in counterance to the percieved robbing of thoughts and ideas from books and ideas. Would it be proper to call it the same thought? No. Would it be proper to call it a reaction? Only in the most mechanical of senses that is cause following effect. This idea would be to liken to a computer having a file copied from one machine to another, while the content remains the same in its physical interpretation on the screen would completely change. As if being opened by two seperate programs. And we are not talking about the files being the same when we talk about ideas, ideas are consequences of what is perceived therefore consequences of the that is copied. Ideas are the effect and in their way, an individual interpretation by how the schematic of an idea is followed by what is transferred. This idea in itself makes up for the massive hurdle that is misunderstanding between two people, each hearing fundamentally the same things while producing two differing ideas. In summation, an idea is a scrutinized original built on the schematic of that which is perceived and is each independent of a person and their surroundings.
Continue reading...
3
Just as the sevenfold revelation Finishes its great unraveling It is burned to ash Even as I think them The words lose meaning Revelations as delicate cobweb strands If I could just put them down on paper But by the time they are written Have become Trite, cheap, frivalous Mere shadows of the first-thoughts I wish I could draw it for you It would not be a schematic Or a biochemical roadmap of the mind Not a diagram of a chambered heart But an equation unsolvable In fact it is hard to tell where the absolutes end And the variables begin It is a secret part kicking and tossing itself inside Just begging to climb it's way out Of the primape body in which it is imprisioned! As the body casts the shadow So does it cast it's shape on the darkness of eternity
0
Apr 26, 2013
Apr 26, 2013 at 11:24 PM UTC
soul
Growing up ugly, alternately fat and thin eating scars for breakfast and time for tea having almost climbed out of a buried bin only for it to be upended & held in place with 1939's world atlas; the one that got europe all wrong & like me, was designed with accuracy in mind Personable birds of prey prodded, persuaded and set free the mean old biped growing inside beach ***** jolly popped and sandcastles raided just to see the looks on hope & holyglow faces their defeat in optimism: my triumph as **** full circle towards schematic self-sabotage Once again i am bitter drunk and to be wed we improvised trite vows and cut ourselves spare keys for access to one another's sickbeds In attendance: maternal ghosts and retired reapers hurting with knowledge & witholding screams Liver-spotted harbingers of age and all its mistakes Older now than I ever thought was likely: refuse to fight against the alarms of everything as everything and everything change around me But there are too many different colours of skin and i never was a tolerant, I was always just witch Now finally alone enough to weigh my empty chairs Surprising, that when black hands  materialise my own teeth flash & spit through septic spells make even him blink, in his absence of eyes For in his face is a nothing that stills me It's the same nothing that i've rotted with All my sorry life i'd settled this way, instead of that To ask for one more would be greedy, wouldn't it? Now it feels like I've begged before, i'll beg again I think when he kisses me  it will be over
0
Jul 15, 2016
Jul 15, 2016 at 1:46 PM UTC
The Alarms of Every
Growing up ugly, alternately fat and thin eating scars for breakfast and time for tea having almost climbed out of a buried bin only for it to be upended & held in place with 1939's world atlas; the one that got europe all wrong & like me, was designed with accuracy in mind Personable birds of prey prodded, persuaded and set free the mean old biped growing inside beach ***** jolly popped and sandcastles raided just to see the looks on hope & holyglow faces their defeat in optimism: my triumph as **** full circle towards schematic self-sabotage Once again i am bitter drunk and to be wed we improvised trite vows and cut ourselves spare keys for access to one another's sickbeds In attendance: maternal ghosts and retired reapers hurting with knowledge & witholding screams Liver-spotted harbingers of age and all its mistakes Older now than I ever thought was likely: refuse to fight against the alarms of everything as everything and everything change around me But there are too many different colours of skin and i never was a tolerant, I was always just witch Now finally alone enough to weigh my empty chairs Surprising, that when black hands  materialise my own teeth flash & spit through septic spells make even him blink, in his absence of eyes For in his face is a nothing that stills me It's the same nothing that i've rotted with All my sorry life i'd settled this way, instead of that To ask for one more would be greedy, wouldn't it? Now it feels like I've begged before, i'll beg again I think when he kisses me  it will be over
Continue reading...
33
i've seen the commentary... but let's do the ratios... youtubers sometimes tend to boast about their subscribes, notably dr. steve turley, 100K (100,000) and styxhexenhammer666   30K (30,000)...    yes, i know that a chris isaack track is, a tad bit too much reminiscent of Abba... point being? my turn... so...         the ratio... i have 138 followers... but my post popular "poem" ranks at around    4,700 views... an average dr. steve turley video ranks in at 20,000, and with subscribers numbering 100,000...           whole styxhexenhammer666, 30,000 subscribers, but at average counts of views at hovering past the 1,000 mark... now the ratios... please let me be wrong, please let me be wrong... 0.5 for dr. steve turley lopsided ratios: 100,000 / 20,000.... styxhexenhammer666 comes in at 30... 30,000 / 1,000... me? i come in at... ha ha! 5,700 / 138 34.057...            i'm not boasting... but i hate to see decent people boast about their prescription rates, but then...                  0.029... but within the confines of    giving an answer back... you get the picture... their viewers plummet... the ratios do not add up... i'd boast, sure as hell i'd boast... but... i sorta don't feel like it... i never saw the bonus side of boasting when it came to numbers... more subscribers, than views?            big ******* problem... so... proud, concerning, what?! oh... wait... i just figured this out differently... 0.033 (styxhexenhammer666) and 0.2 (dr. steve turley)... oh wait... dr. steve turley: circa 74,000 subscribers... and the average viewership of a video circa 21,000?     3.52....               0.02837.... ola! village people!           counter ratios... views : subscribers counter to subscribers : views (in ratio)....             that age old relativism of "success"... give me a minute, i need to work on the schematic rubric... views : subscribers | subscribers : views (a) ~5700 ÷ 138 (a) 138 ÷ ~5700 = 41.30 = 0.024 (b) ~1000 ÷ ~30,000 (b) ~30,000 ÷ ~1000 = 0.033 = 300 (c) ~21,000 ÷ ~70,000 (c) ~70,000 ÷ ~21,000 = 0.284 = 3.52 (a) denoting me, (b) denoting sythexenhammer666 (c) denoting dr. steve turley so wait, give me a minute... since we're all so happy ******* a boasting match... i have... less subscribers... but more views... than people who have more, subscribers... but less views? i know i'm fiddling with the numbers... but to use but one instance... i have more views than i have subscribers... while these youtube vloggers have more subscribers than they have views... interesting... but if everyone's going to be playing the ******* numbers game... i thought: might as well bring by bucket and ***** into this sand-pit, and see if i can play along with these kids... citing my attempt at a massive ***** you never know: it could work!
0
Oct 13, 2018
Oct 13, 2018 at 8:44 PM UTC
ratios against youtubers
i've seen the commentary... but let's do the ratios... youtubers sometimes tend to boast about their subscribes, notably dr. steve turley, 100K (100,000) and styxhexenhammer666   30K (30,000)...    yes, i know that a chris isaack track is, a tad bit too much reminiscent of Abba... point being? my turn... so...         the ratio... i have 138 followers... but my post popular "poem" ranks at around    4,700 views... an average dr. steve turley video ranks in at 20,000, and with subscribers numbering 100,000...           whole styxhexenhammer666, 30,000 subscribers, but at average counts of views at hovering past the 1,000 mark... now the ratios... please let me be wrong, please let me be wrong... 0.5 for dr. steve turley lopsided ratios: 100,000 / 20,000.... styxhexenhammer666 comes in at 30... 30,000 / 1,000... me? i come in at... ha ha! 5,700 / 138 34.057...            i'm not boasting... but i hate to see decent people boast about their prescription rates, but then...                  0.029... but within the confines of    giving an answer back... you get the picture... their viewers plummet... the ratios do not add up... i'd boast, sure as hell i'd boast... but... i sorta don't feel like it... i never saw the bonus side of boasting when it came to numbers... more subscribers, than views?            big ******* problem... so... proud, concerning, what?! oh... wait... i just figured this out differently... 0.033 (styxhexenhammer666) and 0.2 (dr. steve turley)... oh wait... dr. steve turley: circa 74,000 subscribers... and the average viewership of a video circa 21,000?     3.52....               0.02837.... ola! village people!           counter ratios... views : subscribers counter to subscribers : views (in ratio)....             that age old relativism of "success"... give me a minute, i need to work on the schematic rubric... views : subscribers | subscribers : views (a) ~5700 ÷ 138 (a) 138 ÷ ~5700 = 41.30 = 0.024 (b) ~1000 ÷ ~30,000 (b) ~30,000 ÷ ~1000 = 0.033 = 300 (c) ~21,000 ÷ ~70,000 (c) ~70,000 ÷ ~21,000 = 0.284 = 3.52 (a) denoting me, (b) denoting sythexenhammer666 (c) denoting dr. steve turley so wait, give me a minute... since we're all so happy ******* a boasting match... i have... less subscribers... but more views... than people who have more, subscribers... but less views? i know i'm fiddling with the numbers... but to use but one instance... i have more views than i have subscribers... while these youtube vloggers have more subscribers than they have views... interesting... but if everyone's going to be playing the ******* numbers game... i thought: might as well bring by bucket and ***** into this sand-pit, and see if i can play along with these kids... citing my attempt at a massive ***** you never know: it could work!
Continue reading...
111
we wound in stars on old fishing rods; reeling on promises from days where the light still brought species, clutter, schematic belief. you caught three. i caught nothing, but glimmers of hope. allusions and reality are often cleft, though. this truth i'd rather cast, like myself, over cliff-face. but, i alone am mutable in this scheme. you named yours as blank-faced children, born to the sea. predictably, i named mine woe. fate moves through seasons, sovereign groups, ways set down to dot. the object stands; here lies truth. this is the truth: pebbles form kiltered circles under the dock. floating above the architecture of my ribs consuming churned air, i watch me fade. i discern and too, dilapidate. you raised yours with colour in iris. i picked mine up lovingly- this woe is awake and tightly circling.
0
Apr 22, 2014
Apr 22, 2014 at 10:54 PM UTC
sleight
distant dreams repeat themselves right behind my conscious thoughts but all I feel is fleeing stealth masking every thought up core so all I have is an idea of how to wander between shifts knowing by not being here or anywhere without a drift I am alive - at least: am I? all is floating through my mind I see an image, that's a lie but what is hiding there behind my ideas and mental fakes the answer is not mine to know the question is not mine to ask construction is part of the show confusion is part of the show so I repeat schematic dreams   (repeating weird schismatic dreams) that were schematized by no one else that I appear to seem instancies instead of rules abstractable by asking minds after all I'm always fooled by knowing what I seemed to find but feeling free since I can make sense out of dubious words and facts enjoying every working fake makes me a living mind that acts in a world that's far beyond the ways I can explore by thoughts but all is blurred since it responds to what's created in mind first so integration lames my view adapting to what I can think changing within the things I do framing self-referential links so integration frames my mind adapting to what I can think living within the things I find born by precursively ringed ways of experiential links
0
Mar 3, 2014
Mar 3, 2014 at 7:45 AM UTC
knownstruction
Fantasizing everyone Sexualizing everyone And why? I am alone Fantasizing everyone Sexualizing everyone Again. I'm alone And I Devote myself to life as if to keep The stars promised of our destiny Safe and strong and confronting Their mirrors with the proper self applause Alone. I contain a fire, the raging heat The signal pyre, Autumn and the Spring For heat, I chill with my demeanor For cold, I prefer to warm your Goosebumps with my open mouth If permitted take the walkabout To linger with my fingers down your leg If permitted, take the hidden way To kiss your heart and light your path With the source of all your worry Nurtured between my lips Fantasizing everyone Sexualizing everyone And why? What connectivity is left to crave? The men who back their friends Into corners after arranging Clandestine ******* after Clearing out the place to have their way The men who stand with **** In hand, pathetic and commanding Limp of love, and targeting The the light they view as weak I was made just for that Assembled in a factory As an indentured guide To lead to the promised land They drew up my design Schematic with ******* And motherly empathy Perfect for abuse And a ***** perfect For dysphoria For when I learn to love myself It reminds me I'm Armed with alarm And filled with the fluid The learned are simply right to hate Alone.
0
Apr 12, 2018
Apr 12, 2018 at 3:42 AM UTC
The Fetish Bot
the inertia of animation of Narcissus... the water that becomes ice of a fixation... in visage... if only Narcissus found himself... fixating on his shadow... then again... whatever Jung proposed, in schematic, and without mythological imagery... to propose a counter... has been lost to the vague attempts of countering mythology with mystification of the shadow... borrowing from Kant... a shadow is something deemed cold... i say... a shadow is something deemed animate... Narcissus fell in love with an inanimate reflection of himself... and this is why Jung failed to explain the shadow... in that... his explanation does little justice to mythology... and serves nothing more than mysticism... how can mythology not be treated seriously... when the current contest of lived to recorded time is exponentially comical... myth is time with the logic of said myth, being kept as... what coincides with whatever happens now to happen later, having borrowed from what happened in the past, a past, that... mediates the impeccable intricacy of scientific prodding... to disavow a humanism of the, "grand explanatory project"... as if... that will not be countered by an irrational tomorrow... to the rationalism of... oh... say... 3 billions year, give or take. the shadow is too mystical in Jungian terms... my explanation of the shadow is... counter to Narcissus... the demigod who... looking at his shadow... made a more subliminal fascination... the mere form, and how thought somehow contradicted consciousness (dasein)... Jung took the mystical, archetypical route... i took the mythological, archaic route; i guess we both returned to the same conclusion... only that... there wouldn't be a Narcissus without a lake, since there would be no Narcissistic observation on either sea or river... but i sure as hell can cast a shadow onto the sea, as i can, onto a river.
0
Nov 9, 2018
Nov 9, 2018 at 9:42 PM UTC
p.s. to the antonym of Narcissus
the inertia of animation of Narcissus... the water that becomes ice of a fixation... in visage... if only Narcissus found himself... fixating on his shadow... then again... whatever Jung proposed, in schematic, and without mythological imagery... to propose a counter... has been lost to the vague attempts of countering mythology with mystification of the shadow... borrowing from Kant... a shadow is something deemed cold... i say... a shadow is something deemed animate... Narcissus fell in love with an inanimate reflection of himself... and this is why Jung failed to explain the shadow... in that... his explanation does little justice to mythology... and serves nothing more than mysticism... how can mythology not be treated seriously... when the current contest of lived to recorded time is exponentially comical... myth is time with the logic of said myth, being kept as... what coincides with whatever happens now to happen later, having borrowed from what happened in the past, a past, that... mediates the impeccable intricacy of scientific prodding... to disavow a humanism of the, "grand explanatory project"... as if... that will not be countered by an irrational tomorrow... to the rationalism of... oh... say... 3 billions year, give or take. the shadow is too mystical in Jungian terms... my explanation of the shadow is... counter to Narcissus... the demigod who... looking at his shadow... made a more subliminal fascination... the mere form, and how thought somehow contradicted consciousness (dasein)... Jung took the mystical, archetypical route... i took the mythological, archaic route; i guess we both returned to the same conclusion... only that... there wouldn't be a Narcissus without a lake, since there would be no Narcissistic observation on either sea or river... but i sure as hell can cast a shadow onto the sea, as i can, onto a river.
Continue reading...
77
The synopsis we spend so much time writing - are for characters we no longer are. You cannot always draw lines between what was and what is and what should thenceforth be. You cannot always make sense of your coexisting truths, you can only know that they are valid. You cannot avoid good things because somewhere along the line, the character schematic you outlined for yourself doesn’t believe it deserves what you have. You weren’t meant to be a story that plays out in a nostalgically pleasing way. Life is vivid, changing, real, and unpredictable. Unchartable. With no plot other than the one we’re living in the moment, here and now. We don’t even realize how often we choose our current experiences based on old beliefs we are still subconsciously holding of ourselves. Because what we think of ourselves translates into what we allow of ourselves, and what we allow is what we experience, and what we experience is what amounts to our lives as a whole. A whole of which is a book of stories, of which doesn’t need to seamlessly transition into one another. Of which doesn’t have to be narrated the same way. Of which can be as short or long or staggered or confusing or exciting as you want. You are in control of how it plays out —
0
Jul 19, 2014
Jul 19, 2014 at 5:27 PM UTC
You Are A Book Of Stories, Not A Novel