Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
"referent" poems
Tonight I have no words. I cannot grandly sweep my pen In flowing arcs across the page, Drawing little soft impressions (little soft depressions) That show how lovely pain can be. I cannot play the great Creator Who rips a vital pulsing mass from out His chest, And molds still-beating clay With a sad old potter’s gentle hands into a little melancholic harpist who plucks the heartstrings perfectly. No, I have no words that fit Like others have made fit before, composing language to fit all the inward lines and curves (I once knew a few of her’s) that twist and turn and come entwined, (the twists and turns of long ago) crying “Lacrimosa!” in some wee hour as the breeze blows a lacy curtain back. I am no Aeolian instrument Sounding a sweet ethereal chord into the night. I am the vacuous breath left behind in silence When the musician’s music stops — A tuneless referent — An empty exclamation mark Howling noiselessly in space, Meaning nothing And everything, all the same. !
0
Sep 4, 2012
Sep 4, 2012 at 3:37 PM UTC
Mute
He’s a ***** of in- tellectual acumen. A real conveyor of post-modern acuity. What he has to say doesn’t make sense to me. No one understands his esoteric complexity. He speaks of Aristotelian “virtues”, Platonic Forms, and other “practical” participation by the particularities. Part of all that not even he fully understands. Juxtaposing Quniean “webs of Knowledge” with Davidson Coherantism He is challenged by McDowells 2nd nature Bildung. His conventional English is thus un-sung, while meta-physical abstractions are then hung Out to dry, in the abstract realm sky. What color is that sky? “Unfair Question” he cries. “Tell me about God” I ask, “very well” he replies. My brain is numb after one question, and a few words. He continues, “Do the God(s) agree upon what is good?” Yes is my reply. “If so, do they love what is good?” Again yes. “Then, is the Good whatever the God(s) love, or do the God(s) love what is Good?” He must be on drugs. A little philosophy makes a man an atheist. A lot makes him a believer, just not in God. He praises Reason, his room is a shrine. Within four walls one will not find, no not any sign Of conviction. What? All this time thinking, reflecting, meditating, abstracting, observing, weaving grand tapestries of thought and still he does not find a foot hold in reality? What the hell were you thinking about? He responds. A stream of consciousness is all that is, past is a referent future is a predicate. I am not the “me” I refer to when I say “my book.” No sir, I have never spoken to you any knowledge of me. For that I have none of, but knowledge I am not without. If it is one thing I know, it is that I know nothing. I tell him certainly my English teacher would know something to defeat him, I am soon disenchanted, for he has ammunition for her. “Ask her”, he says “to ascertain the truth value to this grammatically perfect declarative Sentence.” Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.
0
Oct 23, 2011
Oct 23, 2011 at 11:29 PM UTC
Freestyling Philosphy
He’s a ***** of in- tellectual acumen. A real conveyor of post-modern acuity. What he has to say doesn’t make sense to me. No one understands his esoteric complexity. He speaks of Aristotelian “virtues”, Platonic Forms, and other “practical” participation by the particularities. Part of all that not even he fully understands. Juxtaposing Quniean “webs of Knowledge” with Davidson Coherantism He is challenged by McDowells 2nd nature Bildung. His conventional English is thus un-sung, while meta-physical abstractions are then hung Out to dry, in the abstract realm sky. What color is that sky? “Unfair Question” he cries. “Tell me about God” I ask, “very well” he replies. My brain is numb after one question, and a few words. He continues, “Do the God(s) agree upon what is good?” Yes is my reply. “If so, do they love what is good?” Again yes. “Then, is the Good whatever the God(s) love, or do the God(s) love what is Good?” He must be on drugs. A little philosophy makes a man an atheist. A lot makes him a believer, just not in God. He praises Reason, his room is a shrine. Within four walls one will not find, no not any sign Of conviction. What? All this time thinking, reflecting, meditating, abstracting, observing, weaving grand tapestries of thought and still he does not find a foot hold in reality? What the hell were you thinking about? He responds. A stream of consciousness is all that is, past is a referent future is a predicate. I am not the “me” I refer to when I say “my book.” No sir, I have never spoken to you any knowledge of me. For that I have none of, but knowledge I am not without. If it is one thing I know, it is that I know nothing. I tell him certainly my English teacher would know something to defeat him, I am soon disenchanted, for he has ammunition for her. “Ask her”, he says “to ascertain the truth value to this grammatically perfect declarative Sentence.” Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.
Continue reading...
36
strictly speaking, there exist no referent for Yesterdays Aches or Tomorrows Concerns in the Real World - just quaint tongue dances and groans of the throat.
0
Feb 13, 2019
Feb 13, 2019 at 4:01 PM UTC
philosophy of language
"A great artist can make art by simply casting a glance" – Robert Smithson Not by drawing a glance, but casting. Imagine the studio. What Molten materials, what Molds needed? Who models, and will they Recognize their eyes, or Is it their object reified – The signifier or the referent Denoted in this indexical Congealing. Shy, illicit, bold, flirtations, imperial, The variations and series of directed looks, Is this the content, or is the captured casting The direction - just the path of pointing: A laser beam, redone in spider web, then done again as differentials of the air? And what of the early work, the Imperfections, who filed down the seams? And would cracks in the mold shift The glance askew, revealing A pliers, a heater, a Reader’s thought?
0
Dec 6, 2015
Dec 6, 2015 at 5:05 PM UTC
Smithson: A Romance