Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
"purposive" poems
Nothingness. Imagine nothingness. That nothingness which is nothing of the nothingness we are all familiar with: Not that nothingness which is nothing but empty space and time Like when you open an empty room. No. That nothingness where nothing truly exists: Not space, Not even time. A singular point. Imagine a singular point. The ultimate singular point that contains all possible points In the development of the universe Come out and expand From the birthing of time, the instance of The Big Bang, (Which by the way is not a large explosion, as the words imply, but a silent rapid expansion) Pushing the envelope Where nothingness begins. Chance. Imagine chance. The random occurrence of events: Of fundamental particles colliding and uniting Or annihilating each other, Giving rise to protons, neutrons and electrons; Giving rise to the periodic table, To compounds, both organic and inorganic, To macromolecules. Billions of years. Imagine billions of years Gone by, And billions of galaxies filling the sky: Stars and quasars and pulsars Planets and comets and meteors ***** nilly hurtling through Dark matter and ever expanding space, Yet inanimate still , A single cell. Imagine a single cell Form inexplicably so, In a staggeringly highly improbable way As carbon molecules combine, Start to throb and pulsate: Chance bringing forth life In a barren and otherwise Lifeless universe. Consciousness Imagine consciousness Purposive, willful, deliberate Feelings Imagine feelings Love, compassion, hatred Imagine all in a universe that came out of itself from nothingness. It is hard, of course, For after all, we are creatures of somethingness! But at this point You must have seen the Point Of all the ramblings and turns in the trajectory of my thought Tracing the evolutionary course of the universe From nothingness and that singular point That without God All things are After all Pointless! . And so, Let us not deplore, as a great poet once did, That this world “so various, so beautiful, so new Hath no joy, nor love, nor light Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain…” For what else should we expect Of a cold, unfeeling universe? What? Give us some Novocain?
0
Jul 16, 2013
Jul 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM UTC
The Point of All These
Nothingness. Imagine nothingness. That nothingness which is nothing of the nothingness we are all familiar with: Not that nothingness which is nothing but empty space and time Like when you open an empty room. No. That nothingness where nothing truly exists: Not space, Not even time. A singular point. Imagine a singular point. The ultimate singular point that contains all possible points In the development of the universe Come out and expand From the birthing of time, the instance of The Big Bang, (Which by the way is not a large explosion, as the words imply, but a silent rapid expansion) Pushing the envelope Where nothingness begins. Chance. Imagine chance. The random occurrence of events: Of fundamental particles colliding and uniting Or annihilating each other, Giving rise to protons, neutrons and electrons; Giving rise to the periodic table, To compounds, both organic and inorganic, To macromolecules. Billions of years. Imagine billions of years Gone by, And billions of galaxies filling the sky: Stars and quasars and pulsars Planets and comets and meteors ***** nilly hurtling through Dark matter and ever expanding space, Yet inanimate still , A single cell. Imagine a single cell Form inexplicably so, In a staggeringly highly improbable way As carbon molecules combine, Start to throb and pulsate: Chance bringing forth life In a barren and otherwise Lifeless universe. Consciousness Imagine consciousness Purposive, willful, deliberate Feelings Imagine feelings Love, compassion, hatred Imagine all in a universe that came out of itself from nothingness. It is hard, of course, For after all, we are creatures of somethingness! But at this point You must have seen the Point Of all the ramblings and turns in the trajectory of my thought Tracing the evolutionary course of the universe From nothingness and that singular point That without God All things are After all Pointless! . And so, Let us not deplore, as a great poet once did, That this world “so various, so beautiful, so new Hath no joy, nor love, nor light Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain…” For what else should we expect Of a cold, unfeeling universe? What? Give us some Novocain?
Continue reading...
74
basic arithmetic in terms of punctuation, otherwise? simply the arithmetic of punctuation: what does (,) equal? what does (.) equal? what does (:) equal? what does (-) equal? what does (;) equal? come on, quick! quick! give me a number! to think, is to not narrate,                                much of what is regarded as    "thinking", simply becomes as art of narration        that is sofa-bound, i.e. so comfortable that it feels it has no inclination toward the use of hands as ever being idle, it simply replaces   hands with a tongue...                     hence: idle speech,                 hence political speech; so if the "devil" has work for idle hands, then "god" has work for the idle zunge                                        (tongue)... but most people don't think,    because their thinkling is solely about narrating,                   their day-to-day...                and i appreciate this custom, in the cognitive realm...          i really do...               how many jokes ushered into the void of one's silence, neither whisphers, nor hummings, nor whistling...         wiser still, essentially unchanged... but heidegger's aphorism no. 285    really bothers me...             the reader looking into the narrator given the existentialist inverted commas    (iberian inverted questioning    ¿   ?          that's the first step toward    an iberian existentialism)                         said the third person,     with third party sources, the middle man, the second person, and then the reader   of the writer's original testimony?    if northern existentialism (french / german...   the english were too reactionary, and too easily bored by the continental drift)        encompasses the tool that's "      "    then the iberian tool has to be the inverted question mark, i.e.       ¿   ?, sitting comfortably? no? how about a wheelchair... let me just break your legs and your spine.        but aphorism 285: "worldview",      "grounding", "configuring"...        i don't understand this allocation of ambiguity, and an italic stress on da-sein / da-sein...    aren't all the three descriptive elements /    adjectives the purposive sentiments for                    originating the concept of dasein? i had to counter with an iberian existential tool...    after all i said, 'he said', "we said"...                                   it's a third party medium of supposed ambiguity...          if there's a santa claus (satan's clause), then there's pontius pilate's clause,   found in the existential tool of     double-ditto "     "   or as the english like to say: inverted commas;    or the ritual: of washing your hands clean    from passing the judgement...    they're citation marks to be honest, come on, let's be pompous, they donned 19th top-hats      at ascot's horse races! who's fooling who?
0
Jun 26, 2017
Jun 26, 2017 at 7:25 AM UTC
iberian existentialism contra northern existentialism (¿qua? vs. "qua")
basic arithmetic in terms of punctuation, otherwise? simply the arithmetic of punctuation: what does (,) equal? what does (.) equal? what does (:) equal? what does (-) equal? what does (;) equal? come on, quick! quick! give me a number! to think, is to not narrate,                                much of what is regarded as    "thinking", simply becomes as art of narration        that is sofa-bound, i.e. so comfortable that it feels it has no inclination toward the use of hands as ever being idle, it simply replaces   hands with a tongue...                     hence: idle speech,                 hence political speech; so if the "devil" has work for idle hands, then "god" has work for the idle zunge                                        (tongue)... but most people don't think,    because their thinkling is solely about narrating,                   their day-to-day...                and i appreciate this custom, in the cognitive realm...          i really do...               how many jokes ushered into the void of one's silence, neither whisphers, nor hummings, nor whistling...         wiser still, essentially unchanged... but heidegger's aphorism no. 285    really bothers me...             the reader looking into the narrator given the existentialist inverted commas    (iberian inverted questioning    ¿   ?          that's the first step toward    an iberian existentialism)                         said the third person,     with third party sources, the middle man, the second person, and then the reader   of the writer's original testimony?    if northern existentialism (french / german...   the english were too reactionary, and too easily bored by the continental drift)        encompasses the tool that's "      "    then the iberian tool has to be the inverted question mark, i.e.       ¿   ?, sitting comfortably? no? how about a wheelchair... let me just break your legs and your spine.        but aphorism 285: "worldview",      "grounding", "configuring"...        i don't understand this allocation of ambiguity, and an italic stress on da-sein / da-sein...    aren't all the three descriptive elements /    adjectives the purposive sentiments for                    originating the concept of dasein? i had to counter with an iberian existential tool...    after all i said, 'he said', "we said"...                                   it's a third party medium of supposed ambiguity...          if there's a santa claus (satan's clause), then there's pontius pilate's clause,   found in the existential tool of     double-ditto "     "   or as the english like to say: inverted commas;    or the ritual: of washing your hands clean    from passing the judgement...    they're citation marks to be honest, come on, let's be pompous, they donned 19th top-hats      at ascot's horse races! who's fooling who?
Continue reading...
65
non-authentic self ~~~ you have never seen me, I have never touched you so ask me am I authentic? am I based on facts, accurate, reliable, purposive & emotionally accurate? drill a core sample into my essence test it for contamination, nutrients, purity, values on a scale measuring human essentials then throw all the results in the garbage if you want to verify my authenticity, *drill down deeper into my poetry*
0
Sep 23, 2015
Sep 23, 2015 at 6:35 AM UTC
non-authentic self
you want war, you have world war two spitfire pilots to serve your post-colonial migration; and yes, i'll twitch my eyes; ha ha cuisine scots using ginger. there's a quintessential fascination with cabbage among the mutli-cultural asians of england being picky concerning scandinavians and the slavs... politico i could say as much about indian spices.. but they're granulated i admit, so there's less stink in the armpits; or there isn't, given chanel cardamom: assimilated asians into british society don’t use raw herrings and cabbage to joke about other european ethnicities while waving the st. george of that great fake curry of suffolk. *i've been telling the turks about sauerkraut for years to match up a purposive additive for the lamb kebab; sours to cut through the lamb fat like the chillies cutting through.*
0
Jan 9, 2016
Jan 9, 2016 at 8:10 PM UTC
cabbage translated
*so there are fifty states and they’re joined by federation laws, but talk of “the state” is not talked about in the same way as talk of california or new jersey or new england... because these states... ah blah blah... why not change it to the f.n.a.: federation of north america? it’d sell you a few badges, t-shirts and balloons.* so in america the federal laws are like ecclesiastical laws, and state laws are like european state laws - steal an onion from a merchant’s stand and get your hand chopped off in the translation of arabic, should it come to such drastic action - so while in europe the church-state of einstein’s vocabulary went their separate ways ensuring that time became definite and space became definite and the space-time / church-state hyphenated coupling was simply defined as indefinite... and that coupling became sort of theoretically stuck in bubblegum of inactivity and awe as truth. in america there’s a purposive blocked toilet of the federal (laws) never meeting the state (laws)... but imagine if the federal met the state like the church once met & clung to the state... this purposive avoidance of the two never meeting in america is already problematic from what i have heard... the two need to meet and then uncouple... like in europe where the church & state met and then divorced... this state / federal engagement can’t last... there has to be a marriage... and subsequent divorce to just see how the political engine works... otherwise there’ll be a lawyers’ limbo to contend with, i.e. when a lawyer doesn’t understand something he tends to use his defence mechanism of making at least one word ambiguous with the word’s secondary, tertiary meaning, which doesn't ask for a serious argument but a solipsistic technicality of not talking to the person least informed but most ambitious to say something, anything. i.e. you can’t really claim that california is federated if the wealth of california is worth as much as iowa, nebraska, north dakota, south dakota, wyoming... basically the whole of mid-west scotland ireland bulgaria and romania and sicily; but i’m sure thomas jefferson was looking for pretty geography rather than equations to stamp out marxism.
0
Oct 22, 2015
Oct 22, 2015 at 11:03 AM UTC
einstein -in- america
*so there are fifty states and they’re joined by federation laws, but talk of “the state” is not talked about in the same way as talk of california or new jersey or new england... because these states... ah blah blah... why not change it to the f.n.a.: federation of north america? it’d sell you a few badges, t-shirts and balloons.* so in america the federal laws are like ecclesiastical laws, and state laws are like european state laws - steal an onion from a merchant’s stand and get your hand chopped off in the translation of arabic, should it come to such drastic action - so while in europe the church-state of einstein’s vocabulary went their separate ways ensuring that time became definite and space became definite and the space-time / church-state hyphenated coupling was simply defined as indefinite... and that coupling became sort of theoretically stuck in bubblegum of inactivity and awe as truth. in america there’s a purposive blocked toilet of the federal (laws) never meeting the state (laws)... but imagine if the federal met the state like the church once met & clung to the state... this purposive avoidance of the two never meeting in america is already problematic from what i have heard... the two need to meet and then uncouple... like in europe where the church & state met and then divorced... this state / federal engagement can’t last... there has to be a marriage... and subsequent divorce to just see how the political engine works... otherwise there’ll be a lawyers’ limbo to contend with, i.e. when a lawyer doesn’t understand something he tends to use his defence mechanism of making at least one word ambiguous with the word’s secondary, tertiary meaning, which doesn't ask for a serious argument but a solipsistic technicality of not talking to the person least informed but most ambitious to say something, anything. i.e. you can’t really claim that california is federated if the wealth of california is worth as much as iowa, nebraska, north dakota, south dakota, wyoming... basically the whole of mid-west scotland ireland bulgaria and romania and sicily; but i’m sure thomas jefferson was looking for pretty geography rather than equations to stamp out marxism.
Continue reading...
45
this system of notation this great archaic atlas, is really misunderstood, for some reason, a reason very much bold if not simply balding from reasons outside of genetics via a scratched head, seems to confuse people, you never hear of painters having to apologise, for outrageous neon red, or ultra-violets that are like paparazzi pepper-spray of flashes leading up to an epileptic seizure... you never hear it... but for some reason, when you write something outrageous you have to conclude by having to write some sort of apologetics; for me people just don't get it, why would a painter apologise for excesses when there aren't any? why would a painter get all the slack and the poet a humbling feel of anonymity? this sort of dynamic only perpetuates mankind's power struggle / gamble in the medium of communication, and when used to express something as fanciful as poetry, immediately taken to invoke a strict obligation for a conversation as simple as: - how much the bananas? - two for one a third one gratis! - in terms of pound? - half a kilo for a quid. - thank you, i'll have two portions of that libra. so by attacking the sole communicating medium of perfect accord we attack it's liberated expression of poetry as we might attack anything that moves with a knife... although it's moving with a knife ready to butter a scone or a crumpet or a half toasted piece of bread according to sting's englishman in new york; and with such purposive attacks language no longer serves a stance of a required medium of communication, but a required medium of discord; as i said once, too many a times to now forcefully repeat: if language could be represented via chemistry... it would be the most volatile substance known to man: more volatile than lithium in water, or the atom-bomb, i dare say.
0
Feb 10, 2016
Feb 10, 2016 at 10:33 AM UTC
conundrum
this system of notation this great archaic atlas, is really misunderstood, for some reason, a reason very much bold if not simply balding from reasons outside of genetics via a scratched head, seems to confuse people, you never hear of painters having to apologise, for outrageous neon red, or ultra-violets that are like paparazzi pepper-spray of flashes leading up to an epileptic seizure... you never hear it... but for some reason, when you write something outrageous you have to conclude by having to write some sort of apologetics; for me people just don't get it, why would a painter apologise for excesses when there aren't any? why would a painter get all the slack and the poet a humbling feel of anonymity? this sort of dynamic only perpetuates mankind's power struggle / gamble in the medium of communication, and when used to express something as fanciful as poetry, immediately taken to invoke a strict obligation for a conversation as simple as: - how much the bananas? - two for one a third one gratis! - in terms of pound? - half a kilo for a quid. - thank you, i'll have two portions of that libra. so by attacking the sole communicating medium of perfect accord we attack it's liberated expression of poetry as we might attack anything that moves with a knife... although it's moving with a knife ready to butter a scone or a crumpet or a half toasted piece of bread according to sting's englishman in new york; and with such purposive attacks language no longer serves a stance of a required medium of communication, but a required medium of discord; as i said once, too many a times to now forcefully repeat: if language could be represented via chemistry... it would be the most volatile substance known to man: more volatile than lithium in water, or the atom-bomb, i dare say.
Continue reading...
59
I would like to believe that someday I will find my way home. A place, no, a feeling that I can emphatize with wholeheartedly. Somewhere where my skin fits perfectly free to roam, Where tears that stream down would end abruptly. A man is free to dream to be with whom he wants to be, Perhaps in heavens of whispers on secret room escapades, Or on the free road with festive decors that lets an unending flow of glee, Bursts of joy that would make someone hopeless feel saved. The waves of the oceans of uncertainties will be crashed, By the roots and foundation of courage and liberty, The winds of shame will be hushed, It is time for the well of hatred, imprisonment, and drama to feel thirsty. All in good time will we reach the moon ever evasive, We aren't fools who won't stand true to what we desire. We are what we are - purposive. We are everything except people who tire.
0
Apr 27, 2017
Apr 27, 2017 at 12:49 PM UTC
In Time