Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
"piet" poems
*you never really say piranha.... it’s more like piraña... no wonder english without the necessary diacritic spans north america and australia and the emoji platform, so the romans said: bonum, sed ν (nu) *** linea obliqus, sic ha est ad hoc tetragrammaton pars, et allah est la la; quamvis latin est mort scriptio autem non clara voce - basically just write some latin using english grammar, what’s beneath it? guess.* i’ve written almost 10,000 poems and still i can only remember having said one or two memorable things, i mean, for god’s sake, the pedigree maine **** that lived with me for the 7 years he lived to dying of kidney failure said more memorable things than i did, having only said meow / miał (i.e. he had it, once), maybe that’s because i don’t actually cradle these outbursts to much appreciation, hence my own worthy critique - but like i said it once admiring spiderweb threads and the washing lines: by the casual phrasing ‘killing time,’ i’m sure people invoke the meaning: to occupy a definite space; the antonym? that’s a bit what philosophy preaches - ‘to stand outside all of time and space,’ well the first one i can do and feel remorseful concerning boredom, but that gives me an indefinite space, although this whole ‘killing time’ is a great option, i’m going to schwarzenegger time with a sawn off umlaut, ooh... kick to the groins watch the crouching tiger hidden *** change - and occupy a definite space. see, you have to find the hammers and the chainsaws in language to escape the waterfall of fictional narration, obviously grammatical categorisation of words makes it easier to suddenly realise: am i really typing, or actually hammering a word in? but realising that grammatical categorisation of words exposes unlikely-to-turn-rusty tools gives writing a whole worth of sanity, as no longer the chance encounter, but a safe environment to abseil like a spider which lost the plot of creativity famed by the cobweb, just ******** out a piet mondrian.
0
Oct 9, 2015
Oct 9, 2015 at 7:10 AM UTC
among cobweb threads and washing lines
*you never really say piranha.... it’s more like piraña... no wonder english without the necessary diacritic spans north america and australia and the emoji platform, so the romans said: bonum, sed ν (nu) *** linea obliqus, sic ha est ad hoc tetragrammaton pars, et allah est la la; quamvis latin est mort scriptio autem non clara voce - basically just write some latin using english grammar, what’s beneath it? guess.* i’ve written almost 10,000 poems and still i can only remember having said one or two memorable things, i mean, for god’s sake, the pedigree maine **** that lived with me for the 7 years he lived to dying of kidney failure said more memorable things than i did, having only said meow / miał (i.e. he had it, once), maybe that’s because i don’t actually cradle these outbursts to much appreciation, hence my own worthy critique - but like i said it once admiring spiderweb threads and the washing lines: by the casual phrasing ‘killing time,’ i’m sure people invoke the meaning: to occupy a definite space; the antonym? that’s a bit what philosophy preaches - ‘to stand outside all of time and space,’ well the first one i can do and feel remorseful concerning boredom, but that gives me an indefinite space, although this whole ‘killing time’ is a great option, i’m going to schwarzenegger time with a sawn off umlaut, ooh... kick to the groins watch the crouching tiger hidden *** change - and occupy a definite space. see, you have to find the hammers and the chainsaws in language to escape the waterfall of fictional narration, obviously grammatical categorisation of words makes it easier to suddenly realise: am i really typing, or actually hammering a word in? but realising that grammatical categorisation of words exposes unlikely-to-turn-rusty tools gives writing a whole worth of sanity, as no longer the chance encounter, but a safe environment to abseil like a spider which lost the plot of creativity famed by the cobweb, just ******** out a piet mondrian.
Continue reading...
26
Kandinsky was smoking *** when Picasso came over to sell him some hash: Wassily said sure, O, Mondrian wants an 8th; sure said Pablo, tell him to swing by my place; Picasso didn't go straight home; stopping at the cafe for a coffee; Mondrian was in a corner booth making out w/ Colette & didn't see Picasso, but Pablo saw them & said nothing, not wanting to bother Piet, who didn't get it all that often; Colette a nice married girl whom everybody 'knew'
0
Aug 3, 2018
Aug 3, 2018 at 5:41 PM UTC
art, smoke & coffee
They say love don't die, That's a lie. They pretend and act as if everything is fine, Meanwhile their heart beats beat with a new style of a cry..why hide? Come don't u be shy. From miles..I used to get a call from my wife,that I would even smile. I even forget that she's so far. Wouldn't you wonder what happens after those lovely calls? Well she called,I answered and she wasn't calling on perpose. That "redail" button got knocked by mistake "Baby I prepered stake for supper" And that's what I heard I wonder what were the starters..I heard oooohs and aaaaaahs I was so glad Now that I know she was cheating. Droped my fone and I turned on my stove Cooked stake for supper, Because it was also my favourate meat And it was my twin brother that made my wife tapout..Damn Piet!
0
Mar 4, 2014
Mar 4, 2014 at 7:08 PM UTC
Love,Lies and Cheats
the first time tristan tzara put his hand into a bag with clippings from newspapers of individual words and started rapping at the cabaret voltaire, after william burroughs extended this method and instead jumbled up paragraphs and even sentences rather than single words to avoid being poetically terse: and later proclaimed that writing is 50 years behind painting... you can still get it wrong in terms of defining the mood of an era of a method... preceding them was piet mondrian - with that new york grid depiction in the vein of minimalistic cubism... just squares and lines... what tristan tzara stumbled upon was how to translate a jackson ******* or a kandinsky with words into words - the chaotic splatter of colour into ink monochrome; it really isn't that easy to write out a jackson ******* it requires a sort of automation, a knowing automation, it's primarily intuitive - you don't know what the exact content will be in each case, but you do know that you're writing in a context of translating your very own kandinsky - even though you're not necessarily looking at an example of kandinsky's work; but let's be pedantic, first tzara, then mandrian, then burroughs, the painters retreated into mathematics and a theory of colour, putting them on equal footing with plato's theory of forms, but to get the setting, poets scout, poets are scouts, writers of fiction are the actual army, who come with bulging sentences, clear depictions (clearly blood will be shed, the uproar of two sides clashing and the sharpening of swords and the swift swooning down of sharpened pin-like arrows with hussar wings to frighten even more), poets scout the new territories - the plateau is never jumbled in fiction, such writers set out with clear vision and aim at running for miles without anything changing, but scouts enter difficult terrain... many twists, many turns, such obstructions as trees, mountains, bees butterflies and seances of witches, not to mention gnarling wolves - for these scouts are obstructed by images, and because of that, some of them report very little for the army of paragraph hunters... but some join rank with them, after all the scouting is done - they too take up a weapon and stand shoulder to shoulder with the giants like tolstoy - although lessening the narrator's role a little.
0
Dec 18, 2015
Dec 18, 2015 at 12:14 PM UTC
theory of colour
the first time tristan tzara put his hand into a bag with clippings from newspapers of individual words and started rapping at the cabaret voltaire, after william burroughs extended this method and instead jumbled up paragraphs and even sentences rather than single words to avoid being poetically terse: and later proclaimed that writing is 50 years behind painting... you can still get it wrong in terms of defining the mood of an era of a method... preceding them was piet mondrian - with that new york grid depiction in the vein of minimalistic cubism... just squares and lines... what tristan tzara stumbled upon was how to translate a jackson ******* or a kandinsky with words into words - the chaotic splatter of colour into ink monochrome; it really isn't that easy to write out a jackson ******* it requires a sort of automation, a knowing automation, it's primarily intuitive - you don't know what the exact content will be in each case, but you do know that you're writing in a context of translating your very own kandinsky - even though you're not necessarily looking at an example of kandinsky's work; but let's be pedantic, first tzara, then mandrian, then burroughs, the painters retreated into mathematics and a theory of colour, putting them on equal footing with plato's theory of forms, but to get the setting, poets scout, poets are scouts, writers of fiction are the actual army, who come with bulging sentences, clear depictions (clearly blood will be shed, the uproar of two sides clashing and the sharpening of swords and the swift swooning down of sharpened pin-like arrows with hussar wings to frighten even more), poets scout the new territories - the plateau is never jumbled in fiction, such writers set out with clear vision and aim at running for miles without anything changing, but scouts enter difficult terrain... many twists, many turns, such obstructions as trees, mountains, bees butterflies and seances of witches, not to mention gnarling wolves - for these scouts are obstructed by images, and because of that, some of them report very little for the army of paragraph hunters... but some join rank with them, after all the scouting is done - they too take up a weapon and stand shoulder to shoulder with the giants like tolstoy - although lessening the narrator's role a little.
Continue reading...
51