Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
"metacognition" poems
you'd like to argue 'no, your grades don't indicate your intelligence' because you have bad grades and you don't want to think of yourself as stupid and now you've settled yourself into a pit of oh, I have bad grades, but that means I'm smart in a better way than them, it's like a smug superior thing, like 'those people have such an ordinary intelligence' and 'here I am, someone whose mind cannot be contained by this fragile institution' and you've made yourself satisfied with your bad grades because you think yourself to be unorthodoxically intelligent and those who have good grades are boring, pointless individuals. you don't want to feel bad about yourself or put in the work to make them better so you decided this mindset would work best for you but I'd like to propose that yes, your grades do indicate your intelligence- it's only a certain kind of intelligence, mind you, but it's the type of intelligence we measure as ordinary intelligence. if you have bad grades you A) don't understand the material B) aren't paying attention C) aren't putting in enough effort or D) there is no D because grades are a combination of homework, tests, quizzes, participation, and projects. I get if you're a bad test taker. I personally don't understand how that works- like, you get the material until someone asks you something about it and then you can't communicate your knowledge? I mean, if you know something, then you know it, and putting it on a paper, test or otherwise, shouldn't be difficult if you actually know what you're talking about. which ties in to A. if you don't understand it, then actually, you C. aren't putting in enough effort. but okay, I'll accept that reason- even though I think bad test takers are a myth. you can't possibly be bad at homework unless you don't put in the time to do it. projects, too. if you fail those, you C. and participation is B. all those are easily solved by hard work if you lack, for now, the kind of 'intelligence' we measure. so if you have bad grades, no, it doesn't mean you're unintelligent. but it does mean you're lazy. or have reached a point where you don't believe you can do more- which is a lie. because you are capable of solving every problem you believe you are capable of solving. and telling yourself 'I'm just not good at school' guarantees that you are not good at school. if you appreciate your capability you can go so much farther. there is a limit to human potential, but I don't think it is different for everyone. I think the limit is where you either cut yourself off or the upper limit- very few people have reached that limit. perhaps no one. but it is very high up there. the limit where you cut yourself off is that imaginary edge of human behavior at which people say "boys will be boys" or "evil is human nature" or "certain people are more inclined to ____ than others, and I am not one of those people" or "everybody's potential is different" because that is not ******* true your potential is what you say it is and the line you draw for yourself is a wall you can now never cross because you don't think you can like 'I will never be more than what I am' or 'All I can be is me' or 'accept me just the way I am' because you can be more. and as a human being with this amazing power of metacognition, you are obligated to be more you are obligated to train yourself and change yourself and program yourself into the best possible human you can be because every action you take builds you higher and every choice you take breaks down the wall you just have to make the decision that you will reach the stars you will do whatever it takes because at the top of that mountain you will realize you can do anything now, you can go anywhere now, you've made it all the way here- now to the moon! and I dare you to go because I know you can.
0
Apr 3, 2014
Apr 3, 2014 at 9:57 PM UTC
a vent
you'd like to argue 'no, your grades don't indicate your intelligence' because you have bad grades and you don't want to think of yourself as stupid and now you've settled yourself into a pit of oh, I have bad grades, but that means I'm smart in a better way than them, it's like a smug superior thing, like 'those people have such an ordinary intelligence' and 'here I am, someone whose mind cannot be contained by this fragile institution' and you've made yourself satisfied with your bad grades because you think yourself to be unorthodoxically intelligent and those who have good grades are boring, pointless individuals. you don't want to feel bad about yourself or put in the work to make them better so you decided this mindset would work best for you but I'd like to propose that yes, your grades do indicate your intelligence- it's only a certain kind of intelligence, mind you, but it's the type of intelligence we measure as ordinary intelligence. if you have bad grades you A) don't understand the material B) aren't paying attention C) aren't putting in enough effort or D) there is no D because grades are a combination of homework, tests, quizzes, participation, and projects. I get if you're a bad test taker. I personally don't understand how that works- like, you get the material until someone asks you something about it and then you can't communicate your knowledge? I mean, if you know something, then you know it, and putting it on a paper, test or otherwise, shouldn't be difficult if you actually know what you're talking about. which ties in to A. if you don't understand it, then actually, you C. aren't putting in enough effort. but okay, I'll accept that reason- even though I think bad test takers are a myth. you can't possibly be bad at homework unless you don't put in the time to do it. projects, too. if you fail those, you C. and participation is B. all those are easily solved by hard work if you lack, for now, the kind of 'intelligence' we measure. so if you have bad grades, no, it doesn't mean you're unintelligent. but it does mean you're lazy. or have reached a point where you don't believe you can do more- which is a lie. because you are capable of solving every problem you believe you are capable of solving. and telling yourself 'I'm just not good at school' guarantees that you are not good at school. if you appreciate your capability you can go so much farther. there is a limit to human potential, but I don't think it is different for everyone. I think the limit is where you either cut yourself off or the upper limit- very few people have reached that limit. perhaps no one. but it is very high up there. the limit where you cut yourself off is that imaginary edge of human behavior at which people say "boys will be boys" or "evil is human nature" or "certain people are more inclined to ____ than others, and I am not one of those people" or "everybody's potential is different" because that is not ******* true your potential is what you say it is and the line you draw for yourself is a wall you can now never cross because you don't think you can like 'I will never be more than what I am' or 'All I can be is me' or 'accept me just the way I am' because you can be more. and as a human being with this amazing power of metacognition, you are obligated to be more you are obligated to train yourself and change yourself and program yourself into the best possible human you can be because every action you take builds you higher and every choice you take breaks down the wall you just have to make the decision that you will reach the stars you will do whatever it takes because at the top of that mountain you will realize you can do anything now, you can go anywhere now, you've made it all the way here- now to the moon! and I dare you to go because I know you can.
Continue reading...
103
When we found out we weren’t the Center of the Universe It shook the core of our collective selfish selves. We called the findings blasphemous We charged the scientists as heretics We realized we were less than specks of dust But worse off because metacognition is unrelenting. After all these years The stars remain indifferent to our presence But we study them all the same Doting them like a school girl obsessing over a secret crush Extrapolating their composition while they don’t bat an eye Humbled at the horrific beauty: A lonely planet orbiting all too busy universe.
0
Nov 24, 2013
Nov 24, 2013 at 1:10 PM UTC
Self Centered
I'm nocturnal But I'm glowing inside. One may not see Looking from the outside. Upside and down Side to side Confusion all around. Angry in retrospect No longer more I found the confidence To break away from this internal state of war. And to explore, How to love The joys of a stable core. Solitude a welcoming friend I failed to comprehend, I'm sorry dear one It was you I needed to work on all along. Neglecting you were here for the long run, allowing external influences To consume, engulf, dictate, What I was when it was you But you are me and I am you. I shall not forget the mark you leave Because without you I'll give in To all my insecurities. Destroying us, Like a crumbling statue Leaking water and all that spews. No longer will I be whole. Who is you? For you are not a person. Non-exsistent. You're my self-worth, my credence My internal self. And till today you belonged detached, Mismatched, unattached. And I shall obliterate, that cognitive state. For this weak flame shall smother, And burn bright for those who wish to see. You are my definitions My interests, hobbies, passions Replies and reactions. You are the tastes buds I so dearly love. The endless daydreams I conjure My demure, For you are me when I am secure.
0
Nov 5, 2013
Nov 5, 2013 at 2:06 AM UTC
metacognition
☺☻☺☻ When painters who paint about painting meet writers who write about writing, self-conscious redundancy bordering lunacy ends in esthetic in-fighting. These modernists, right about nothing (mostly nihilists mad about something) are so lost in the process they vent all their excess in metacognition: dull writing. You poets who muse about musing – unaware you are reader-abusing, provide a terrific verbose soporific, yet not of the hearer’s own choosing… I long for some righteous verbosity – but I’m stifled by all the pomposity. This dull erudition, “sub-metacognition”, is but an artistic atrocity. You thinkers who think about thinking drag my spirit far lower than sinking. What we want is a Word which we haven’t yet heard – so till then I’ll just drink about drinking.
0
Sep 11, 2015
Sep 11, 2015 at 5:40 PM UTC
Amazing Muses’ Amusing Mazes
Little moments peeking behind my facade of searching amid trees I'm walking to you I am talking About long days I am living these times are calling to me, though I'm falling farther from your embrace do you miss my words? those things which betray me who I am though I am trying to be me for myself and Him I feel your guidance though I am falling again the tension i'm experiencing is raking my soul I watch her watching nature in her perched loveliness she knows no bounds but only because she is without a mind and understanding rationality and thinking are nothing to feeling for it is by feeling I am alive, though I don't live by feeling I am one with Him and He with me I am the bride of His choosing but I am not worthy because I am not working "my output is my worth" I feel society watching and weighing me, through these thick blinds comparing the next person to my possessions are these possessions mine? or do they and I belong to this world I am living in I am giving in, seeing in him and her and all of society a oneness in charity, if only a malady of death sweeping over a cooler portion of earth, her sweeping dimensions encapsulating and soaking the mind in wonder, though I often do not see the passing of time's painful passing I am perceiving myself perceiving.
0
May 22, 2016
May 22, 2016 at 8:45 PM UTC
Metacognition: My Conscious Stream of Subconscious
have you ever sat and thought about how everything is nothing and how nothing is really everything how nothing matters, really, and nothing you say to someone is really exactly perfect for that moment because later on, you're just going to go back and think "saying this would have been better" and relationships, love, hate that's not anything either because it all ends and who is there to read the story afterward and if there was a story, who would stand to read the heartbreak? thinking about thinking thinking about thoughts about how everything is actually tiny little cells sparking their tiny existence as if to get something else's attention but they are too tiny to notice we can't see the trees for the forest and really, i wish all that i was was just the tiny invisible cells so i could drift through matter without being noticed just drifting along sidewalks and across streets drifting through existence without a glance from a human because then i would not feel so acutely conscious of the stares of others at my broken, huddled, hurting heart and the hearts around campus that i love hurting too, because my love could not stand theirs. it hurts so much, parted without knowing why and simultaneously knowing it was for the best. why must anyone have to leave someone they love just because rationally they know that's not the one for them? rationalization trumps emotion if you want to continue living because we all know emotions **** so we give in to what we know we have to do: break ourselves, break the other person and live broken and apart and bleeding all over the concrete ground wishing for invisibility and refuge.
0
Dec 2, 2015
Dec 2, 2015 at 12:02 PM UTC
Metacognition
have you ever sat and thought about how everything is nothing and how nothing is really everything how nothing matters, really, and nothing you say to someone is really exactly perfect for that moment because later on, you're just going to go back and think "saying this would have been better" and relationships, love, hate that's not anything either because it all ends and who is there to read the story afterward and if there was a story, who would stand to read the heartbreak? thinking about thinking thinking about thoughts about how everything is actually tiny little cells sparking their tiny existence as if to get something else's attention but they are too tiny to notice we can't see the trees for the forest and really, i wish all that i was was just the tiny invisible cells so i could drift through matter without being noticed just drifting along sidewalks and across streets drifting through existence without a glance from a human because then i would not feel so acutely conscious of the stares of others at my broken, huddled, hurting heart and the hearts around campus that i love hurting too, because my love could not stand theirs. it hurts so much, parted without knowing why and simultaneously knowing it was for the best. why must anyone have to leave someone they love just because rationally they know that's not the one for them? rationalization trumps emotion if you want to continue living because we all know emotions **** so we give in to what we know we have to do: break ourselves, break the other person and live broken and apart and bleeding all over the concrete ground wishing for invisibility and refuge.
Continue reading...
34
As you are reading this I am standing right behind you SHING ha! Fool, you're too slow. I've teleported exactly 5402.4 miles away from your location already. This is the power of my metacognition. Jesus may have walked on water, but my metacognition powers have changed the course of history Afterall, who won world war 1, 2, gave birth to Albert Einstein and Elon Musk and founded America? It was only because of the genius of my metacognition And now, after collecting the 8 chaos emeralds I have emerged from a chrysalis And evolved into the perfect being FEAR ME,FOR MY METACOGNITION LEVELS HAVE ASCENDED TO 5 MILLION TIMES THEIR NORMAL STATE
0
Mar 14, 2019
Mar 14, 2019 at 1:22 PM UTC
Metacognition- Chrysantheumalis
getting used to getting used ain't that ******* sad tired of being too tired to enjoy what i have waiting just to wait some more it can't be that bad it's breaking my heart to break the ties i never really had wanting to want you like you're the only savior walk it off or walk away come back never or later sorry for being sorry it's just part of my nature good people do good things to get rewarded for their behavior imagine a forever that goes on forever and you will lose your mind pieces of me to piece your self back together solving your puzzle destroys mine running from them while you're running from me almost keeping our paces in time loving someone that is loving someone else swearing one day they will realize they don't love you because you don't love yourself stuck in a lonely loop why do you only have you when your biggest is enemy is you lie to them so they will lie to you because you can't face the truth hurt them like they hurt you but is that really what you want to do he's sad so your sad but you are still alone calling his phone while they're calling your bluff silence and a ringtone face to face then skin to skin but you don't feel it in your bones you got what you wanted but its not what you wanted confused and don't know where to go
0
Feb 26, 2019
Feb 26, 2019 at 2:49 PM UTC
metacognition
Transcendentalist conceit. My choice of delivery. Arbitrary? Perhaps, but fun. And it gave me an excuse to stall for quality. But apparently it became a stream of consciousness somewhere along the line. It also seems to be coming along in a sort of meta(physical) fashion. Metacognition. All (the) techniques I like. I like you. Parallel inspiration, a sublime way to, again, stall, also to make it interesting. But the comparison is difficult to find. Hidden in the æther, as it was. What are you? A tree? Nature? Air, earth, water, fire, or spirit? Life? Death? All, or even nothing? No. So far into this frozen in time facsimile of my mind, of me, yet still you know not what I think of you as, what I contrast you with. What I Compare you to. What I Expect you to Live Up To. Anxiety? How many poems will I write before this ones done? ultimately one, yet many. Am I stalling even now? A tease of sorts. I am quite good at that. The conceit. What is it? Do you want it? A hundred thousand parallel rush through my mind only to be pushed off the line. A note written by my current and intended audience printed "I love you". I underline you and return to sender. Inspiration! flooding my mind! Are you sharp enough to have discerned the parallel yet? hopefully. But if you think you are, you're wrong. There is no parallel. Moreover, a parallel poorly defines a line. what we really need is a co-linear expression. In truth, the conceit is pretty conceited. I compare you to you. My grand conceit. When you I see, see I you. I see the candid truth that you duplicitous lie. I see your beauty alongside your failure to recognize and believe. I see you. And I love what I see.
0
Feb 28, 2014
Feb 28, 2014 at 7:43 AM UTC
Untitled
Transcendentalist conceit. My choice of delivery. Arbitrary? Perhaps, but fun. And it gave me an excuse to stall for quality. But apparently it became a stream of consciousness somewhere along the line. It also seems to be coming along in a sort of meta(physical) fashion. Metacognition. All (the) techniques I like. I like you. Parallel inspiration, a sublime way to, again, stall, also to make it interesting. But the comparison is difficult to find. Hidden in the æther, as it was. What are you? A tree? Nature? Air, earth, water, fire, or spirit? Life? Death? All, or even nothing? No. So far into this frozen in time facsimile of my mind, of me, yet still you know not what I think of you as, what I contrast you with. What I Compare you to. What I Expect you to Live Up To. Anxiety? How many poems will I write before this ones done? ultimately one, yet many. Am I stalling even now? A tease of sorts. I am quite good at that. The conceit. What is it? Do you want it? A hundred thousand parallel rush through my mind only to be pushed off the line. A note written by my current and intended audience printed "I love you". I underline you and return to sender. Inspiration! flooding my mind! Are you sharp enough to have discerned the parallel yet? hopefully. But if you think you are, you're wrong. There is no parallel. Moreover, a parallel poorly defines a line. what we really need is a co-linear expression. In truth, the conceit is pretty conceited. I compare you to you. My grand conceit. When you I see, see I you. I see the candid truth that you duplicitous lie. I see your beauty alongside your failure to recognize and believe. I see you. And I love what I see.
Continue reading...
35
don't inflict me with your introspection, dangerous, idle, self-reflection, tap out of my headspace my cerebral territory is not a good place I don't need to think about my thinking metacognition is a fruitless mission I'm telling you now get out get out get out
0
Jan 24, 2019
Jan 24, 2019 at 10:34 PM UTC
thinking
starving myself into submission the casual result of unchecked ambition the focusing factors the aderall and ritalin try to drown me but i hang tight on the sight of an unbroken vision my actions, my words under constant revision revisit the sites where i break down decisions had options i lost them in thoughtless metacognition and i know i’m long gone cause i’m stuck in remission
0
Mar 27, 2019
Mar 27, 2019 at 1:06 AM UTC
obsessive compulsive disaster