it's etiquette, aesthetics in itself? a bit like: art for art in itself? who the hell minds calling etiquette an aesthetic movement, when etiquette only serves itself, rather than an aesthetic for others to observe an call for the: decor in oculus ex spectator... the concept of etiquette ***** sweaty salty ***** in the realm of aesthetics, it's principled for itself alone, and no one else... what it is is: absurd.
i don't understand why the english press
doesn't fathom polish nationalism -
i simply cannot fathom it -
implying that polish nationalism is
tinged with neo-**** slurs is simply
unfathomable to me,
might as well add:
at least the poles do not have the problem
to discuss ethnic-cocktails of
3/4 italian a quarter jew...
it's not out of bias -
i've lived in england for over 20 years,
i have not pledge a dual-national identity -
and i lean toward using english in
my cognitive realm more than i tend
to entertain using polish -
proof? i can't remember the months
alphabet in polish...
a week i can remember,
the nouns, but a year? **** me,
yet what bothers me is that
western journalism is afraid of:
not so much the nationalism -
but the collectivism -
the uniform undisputed collective -
what scares them is that in poland,
there is no fringe movement -
it's populist - they're actually afraid
of what an authentic nation looks like...
this is not some ***-crack of an alt-right
movement, this is people coming together
without a dialectical impetus, or precursor,
it's a tsunami, an *******,
and for that: there's no chance to slander,
to pick out the weakest antelope,
the youngest, and apply the slander,
the naming, equating that person with
being neo-****... ironically in about 100
years they'll call them polish concentration
camps, rather than german concentration camps,
which is why i once suggested,
pull them apart, and ship them off to
neo-****** doesn't exist
in poland, what western cultures fear
is an actual *nation - a collective -
not bothered whether there is a worthwhile
individualism to be catered for -
put twice simply:
for all the care for individualism -
western individuals have produced
a stock of, rather, unspectacular
this abhorrent politico
of defending the mediocre expressions,
hopeful for the ******* "golden child"
is exhausting - in the anglophone world
i'm either living in an insane asylum,
or a nursery...
can't decide which...
but if you look at the most
mediocre person in a collective?
can you see any mediocre, can you
actually see it? i can't:
because the people have gathered,
and the tsunami doesn't dismember
you into an individual:
it dismembers you to align you
into a collective, and as a collective:
you are a force to be reckoned with.
neo-**** slurs will not work on these people,
you have to gravitate to this conclusion,
when people are united,
they do not feel intimidated...
esp. when there's no ethnic-cocktail
to mind, pick and choosing paternal or
western journalistic turnip-heads
can't tell the difference between
healthy, collective nationalism,
and fringe groups in their own
don't you ******* get it?!
of all the countries in western europe,
what country in the amalgam took an
existential "hiatus" from the history books?
which one became incorporated in
the trinity of prussia, austro-hungary
waiting for a ******* answer...
can you at least entertain
the idea that people are celebrating
their nationalism, because they have
regained their nation?!
no? wait till you lose yours,
you'll be ******* jack ****-a-boo
in a few years...
slurring these people as neo-**** is like
typing out that typical psychiatric:
false regression technique...
were you occupied by the nazis?
wait, i thought you said the israelis were nazis...
no i'm confused with this whole
trans omni movement that branches
into ***, skin and tears...
it's simple fear,
that the centre of warsaw can be lit up in red,
and be filled with a cloud of smoke...
emerging from the flares -
and that similar attempts in the anglophone
world are equivalent to:
under cooked potatoes,
pointless as an umbrella opened,
when shoved up someone's ***.
p.s. guess what, i'm not afraid of an individual
individuals harass and
mongrel the idea of bullying by
collective consent -
they have none...
and don't you think that any sport,
most notably rugby, is a simulation
of *******, and the travel through
the ******? i guess most sport is,
but rugby exemplifies the ***** journey -
notably: they're passing an egg-shaped