Submit your work, meet writers and drop the ads. Become a member
May 2017
i forgot to mention a teaspoon of garlic paste...
        with all things in the asian cuisine,
you need some sort of piquant addition,
                 in that "recipe" / more like an organic
chemistry experiment, the quantaties are hidden
from view... so the whole 'teaspoon of garlic paste'?
it's not necessarily true; by my estimates.
wait... this is not what i was going to write
about...
               now, i do understand the divorce
of state from church... i get that,
          it's plain to see... young politicians, old popes,
or thereabouts...
                    that concept is perfectly understandable...
what i don't understand is the modern
quest for:                 the divorce of subject
                            from object...
             in cartesian terms of three little words:
cogito ergo sum...                that's truly unfathomable!
it only leads toward a confusion that's the algebraic
equivalent of an x, i.e.

              i think = object   i am = object
                                        x
                i am = subject   i think = subject

or is that?

              i think = object    i am = object
                                        x
            i think = subject    i am = subject...

yeah... that sounds better a second time...
       but how on earth are you going to do this, and this is
an ultra-secular        heimlich maneuver,
                       there literally is no logical ergo follow-up
mechanisation of this, so-called social-science "procedure";
    because what is happening, right now,
is this grand debate about being objective
            to the point where, your emotions are worth zilch,
summed up akin to: a penny for your thought.
            it's pretty much a realisation that's happening
in islam...          a second wave schism,
      with the first wave being that from the divorce of
state from church... even though the fact
that the vatican is a church-state...
                                      so that worked out, just fine.
i really don't know how this new divorce is going
  to play out...
            but trying to divorce subject from object,
or object from subject, it a bit like trying to divorce
      cogito from sum, in the foundation of
         cogito ergo sum... how's that going to happen?
and, more important to suggest: will we see limbs flying?
is throwing a decapitated head going to be the competing
sporting event at the olympics, alongside shot put?
well... **** me... good luck!
           the subject is the object of its subjectivity...
   as the object is the subject of its objectivity...
                                and yes, that's ownership inclusive;
a bit like a copyright.
Mateuš Conrad
Written by
Mateuš Conrad  36/M/Essex (England)
(36/M/Essex (England))   
266
   欣快
Please log in to view and add comments on poems