i forgot to mention a teaspoon of garlic paste...
with all things in the asian cuisine,
you need some sort of piquant addition,
in that "recipe" / more like an organic
chemistry experiment, the quantaties are hidden
from view... so the whole 'teaspoon of garlic paste'?
it's not necessarily true; by my estimates.
wait... this is not what i was going to write
about...
now, i do understand the divorce
of state from church... i get that,
it's plain to see... young politicians, old popes,
or thereabouts...
that concept is perfectly understandable...
what i don't understand is the modern
quest for: the divorce of subject
from object...
in cartesian terms of three little words:
cogito ergo sum... that's truly unfathomable!
it only leads toward a confusion that's the algebraic
equivalent of an x, i.e.
i think = object i am = object
x
i am = subject i think = subject
or is that?
i think = object i am = object
x
i think = subject i am = subject...
yeah... that sounds better a second time...
but how on earth are you going to do this, and this is
an ultra-secular heimlich maneuver,
there literally is no logical ergo follow-up
mechanisation of this, so-called social-science "procedure";
because what is happening, right now,
is this grand debate about being objective
to the point where, your emotions are worth zilch,
summed up akin to: a penny for your thought.
it's pretty much a realisation that's happening
in islam... a second wave schism,
with the first wave being that from the divorce of
state from church... even though the fact
that the vatican is a church-state...
so that worked out, just fine.
i really don't know how this new divorce is going
to play out...
but trying to divorce subject from object,
or object from subject, it a bit like trying to divorce
cogito from sum, in the foundation of
cogito ergo sum... how's that going to happen?
and, more important to suggest: will we see limbs flying?
is throwing a decapitated head going to be the competing
sporting event at the olympics, alongside shot put?
well... **** me... good luck!
the subject is the object of its subjectivity...
as the object is the subject of its objectivity...
and yes, that's ownership inclusive;
a bit like a copyright.