The heart comes first
above all else
beyond all else
together with all else
the heart must come first,
mustn't it?
the heart should come first,
shouldn't it?
if the heart is so important
why must there be need to affirm its importance?
the heart is not the originator of feelings,
the limbic system is
the heart is not the driver
but merely a reactive passenger
it is neither self, nor ego
the heart is just... the heart
could it be, perhaps
that it is where the soul is intimated?
where passion is derived and fueled
it drives one to dream
to hope, to fulfil, to conquer...
and to despair
maybe it is what makes us humans, human
without such
we are merely living and breathing,
as other animals do—and they too have hearts
but unlike ours
ours is mostly referred to as an unknowable construct
a purely man-made invention (like Valentine’s Day)
a metaphysical manifestation of our existential insecurity
or maybe just a tired lover’s cliche?
if the heart comes first
then what’s next?
Apr 1, 2016
Apr 1, 2016 at 10:43 PM UTC
The heart comes first
above all else
beyond all else
together with all else
the heart must come first,
mustn't it?
the heart should come first,
shouldn't it?
if the heart is so important
why must there be need to affirm its importance?
the heart is not the originator of feelings,
the limbic system is
the heart is not the driver
but merely a reactive passenger
it is neither self, nor ego
the heart is just... the heart
could it be, perhaps
that it is where the soul is intimated?
where passion is derived and fueled
it drives one to dream
to hope, to fulfil, to conquer...
and to despair
maybe it is what makes us humans, human
without such
we are merely living and breathing,
as other animals do—and they too have hearts
but unlike ours
ours is mostly referred to as an unknowable construct
a purely man-made invention (like Valentine’s Day)
a metaphysical manifestation of our existential insecurity
or maybe just a tired lover’s cliche?
if the heart comes first
then what’s next?
Request permission to use this poem