. great!
the spelling
of an "offensive"
word is
more distressing
to you
than a sexualisation
of a naked body...
page 3
of the sun comes
nowhere the censor
of the word f%%%;
good boy, good girl,
make sure language
is ***** and that actual
***** is considered
casual-kojak -
for
the paedo-ring-leaders;
you try
speaking the truth,
i'll deny it...
first you apply
the decipher in writing
language...
and attempt to treat
your invented disease
that's dyslexia....
housewife quacks
wishing for a hard-on;
start talking to nuns
and baking cakes...
or do a downer!
go transgender!
the nag hammadi "library"
will surely guide you
down the "righetous" path;
the pronouns belong
to me...
if "she" can make
me believe "she's" a woman,
i will call "him" a she;
d'uh, coming from a mouth
that once said:
i'd **** anything
that moves,
if a "she" can fool a man...
what's the problem?
are people forgetting that,
to clarify pronouns,
you sometimes have to grate
some article usage?
there's a indefinite "pronoun"
that fools hetero....
but there's also the
definite "pronoun" the hetero
man identifies with, and owns
twice-over....
if a hetero man doesn't
think about ******* you,
sorry... you're like a frankenstein's
monster experiment gone wrong...
or more like igor's monster...
the rich can have it all...
the best you can do is internalise
the dysphoria, and wish
for a lucky lottery ticket,
or rich grandparents to perfect
the transition,
that i might sexually consider you
as a woman...
otherwise?
let's just say,
that when western society closed
its mental asylums, it created
its societies in asylums,
where everyone could
be considered mentally
ill.
Jul 2, 2017
Jul 2, 2017 at 10:22 PM UTC
. great!
the spelling
of an "offensive"
word is
more distressing
to you
than a sexualisation
of a naked body...
page 3
of the sun comes
nowhere the censor
of the word f%%%;
good boy, good girl,
make sure language
is ***** and that actual
***** is considered
casual-kojak -
for
the paedo-ring-leaders;
you try
speaking the truth,
i'll deny it...
first you apply
the decipher in writing
language...
and attempt to treat
your invented disease
that's dyslexia....
housewife quacks
wishing for a hard-on;
start talking to nuns
and baking cakes...
or do a downer!
go transgender!
the nag hammadi "library"
will surely guide you
down the "righetous" path;
the pronouns belong
to me...
if "she" can make
me believe "she's" a woman,
i will call "him" a she;
d'uh, coming from a mouth
that once said:
i'd **** anything
that moves,
if a "she" can fool a man...
what's the problem?
are people forgetting that,
to clarify pronouns,
you sometimes have to grate
some article usage?
there's a indefinite "pronoun"
that fools hetero....
but there's also the
definite "pronoun" the hetero
man identifies with, and owns
twice-over....
if a hetero man doesn't
think about ******* you,
sorry... you're like a frankenstein's
monster experiment gone wrong...
or more like igor's monster...
the rich can have it all...
the best you can do is internalise
the dysphoria, and wish
for a lucky lottery ticket,
or rich grandparents to perfect
the transition,
that i might sexually consider you
as a woman...
otherwise?
let's just say,
that when western society closed
its mental asylums, it created
its societies in asylums,
where everyone could
be considered mentally
ill.