Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
removed.polaroid-scrabblePoems
i always aimed at returning Nietzsche's ping-pong serve of poet-philosopher, as philosopher-poet... well, you know, any vanity project will do these days, given our current celebrity culture... there's nothing celebratory about it, so my little festivity of hope in establishing a self-style vocabulary might be too much for Gucci... but you got to try and whiff up a tornado of absinthe sweeties in licorice black (lee ko reesh). there's only one argument i cling on to, it is theological, i'm biased toward the theological argument always, because i've seen the ontological argument become desecrated by oncology - every theologian argues the same: there's a god, because, to be frank, whatever ontology provides us, it leaves us more bewildered than anything: how we expressed our freedom will never be compensated in terms of how others expressed theirs... so even Kant said: my ontology is based on god... so his contemporaries said: my theology is based on no god...     which is why Kant professed a theology   without an ontology, and his contemporaries professed an ontology without a theology - or as the other, in existentialist terms might have suggested: timing - but no one desires a godly status, so even his promenade timing made affinities with serfs begging for a watch rather than watching their shadows dwarf at noon...                                             this is called translating rhyme into philosophy, or philosophical rhyming... words of close proximity are prime exponents, given the spelling, i.e. the suffix - but which are totally antonymous - they look so alike, but then thinking provides disparity of intention, not so lazily done with red                   and dead...                                               head        and Pb...                                      is it?
0
Sep 11, 2016
Sep 11, 2016 at 10:47 PM UTC
rhyming in philosopy
i always aimed at returning Nietzsche's ping-pong serve of poet-philosopher, as philosopher-poet... well, you know, any vanity project will do these days, given our current celebrity culture... there's nothing celebratory about it, so my little festivity of hope in establishing a self-style vocabulary might be too much for Gucci... but you got to try and whiff up a tornado of absinthe sweeties in licorice black (lee ko reesh). there's only one argument i cling on to, it is theological, i'm biased toward the theological argument always, because i've seen the ontological argument become desecrated by oncology - every theologian argues the same: there's a god, because, to be frank, whatever ontology provides us, it leaves us more bewildered than anything: how we expressed our freedom will never be compensated in terms of how others expressed theirs... so even Kant said: my ontology is based on god... so his contemporaries said: my theology is based on no god...     which is why Kant professed a theology   without an ontology, and his contemporaries professed an ontology without a theology - or as the other, in existentialist terms might have suggested: timing - but no one desires a godly status, so even his promenade timing made affinities with serfs begging for a watch rather than watching their shadows dwarf at noon...                                             this is called translating rhyme into philosophy, or philosophical rhyming... words of close proximity are prime exponents, given the spelling, i.e. the suffix - but which are totally antonymous - they look so alike, but then thinking provides disparity of intention, not so lazily done with red                   and dead...                                               head        and Pb...                                      is it?
Written by
removed.polaroid-scrabble
36/M
Sep 11, 2016
Sep 11, 2016 at 10:47 PM UTC
Request permission to use this poem