*oh, what glorious things the canadians and americans think of the british, in their set narrative when a tragedy plagues these isles; mainly stressing the british concept of tolerance. well... perhaps the morbid politeness toward muslims, that the hindus didn't get, back in the 1960s? hmm... or the bourgeois media class... with their affectionate portrayal eastern european builders... well... **** me, are all my brethren builders? we all seem to be builders all of a sudden, like that's something to demean people of skill. you know how degenerate english builders are? how unskillful they are, in the roofing trade? my father can show me roofers with 20 years worth of "experience", and the photographs are worth a good long pause, and lament... they were changing the tiles on my roof, and one night, with heavy rain pouring down, water was seeping through my ceiling... scots were known to be the best roofers in the 1990s... replaced by poles.*
anyway, talk of graphemes...
polish has, in all honesty,
four potentials to become graphemes,
i don't know how, but they could become
unique script elements...
alas
sz cz rz dz
are in their own category, distinct from
the category of grapheme...
it's almost a shame,
the four being digraphs...
oh... and you know that there's a trigraph
in the english language?
you know it, i'm sure...
y = why,
but no one will tell you that that is a trigraph,
even the dictionary won't tell you it's a trigraph,
it'll tell you why is either an adverb and exclamation
or a noun... but never that it's also a trigraph
of what is also a monograph, represented by
y... and perhaps, just perhaps,
this is just one of those mysteries
worth excavating from the tombs of the tetragrammaton,
and set against a rosetta stone of the modern
era... in what becomes of
the hebrew serif י...
perhaps, well, only possible
in english the trigraph why...
encompassed in the monograph that's y;
and that's only one h short to complete the equation.
Jun 5, 2017
Jun 5, 2017 at 1:03 PM UTC
*oh, what glorious things the canadians and americans think of the british, in their set narrative when a tragedy plagues these isles; mainly stressing the british concept of tolerance. well... perhaps the morbid politeness toward muslims, that the hindus didn't get, back in the 1960s? hmm... or the bourgeois media class... with their affectionate portrayal eastern european builders... well... **** me, are all my brethren builders? we all seem to be builders all of a sudden, like that's something to demean people of skill. you know how degenerate english builders are? how unskillful they are, in the roofing trade? my father can show me roofers with 20 years worth of "experience", and the photographs are worth a good long pause, and lament... they were changing the tiles on my roof, and one night, with heavy rain pouring down, water was seeping through my ceiling... scots were known to be the best roofers in the 1990s... replaced by poles.*
anyway, talk of graphemes...
polish has, in all honesty,
four potentials to become graphemes,
i don't know how, but they could become
unique script elements...
alas
sz cz rz dz
are in their own category, distinct from
the category of grapheme...
it's almost a shame,
the four being digraphs...
oh... and you know that there's a trigraph
in the english language?
you know it, i'm sure...
y = why,
but no one will tell you that that is a trigraph,
even the dictionary won't tell you it's a trigraph,
it'll tell you why is either an adverb and exclamation
or a noun... but never that it's also a trigraph
of what is also a monograph, represented by
y... and perhaps, just perhaps,
this is just one of those mysteries
worth excavating from the tombs of the tetragrammaton,
and set against a rosetta stone of the modern
era... in what becomes of
the hebrew serif י...
perhaps, well, only possible
in english the trigraph why...
encompassed in the monograph that's y;
and that's only one h short to complete the equation.