contentious retraction of a failed
dualism,
happy schizophrenia,
my money is "biased"
in metaphor:
little people, little needs,
the rest remains a gargantuan
enterprise...
little fool, little fowl:
and from a grain of
sand, a unit, to conceptualiße
the breadth and depth of tme....
little people: you know:
belittle differences,
market the gains...
trip and attempt to fall.
oh, i took the noun confusion to be
an artefsact associated with your, profession
being taken seriously?
my bad...
because aren't
lawyers the only, "true", readers,
of a thesaurus?
nibbling qusi-vermin,
you could almost squash
them with an ****** impetus at
spotting a cockroach...
thing with rats...
esp. of a certain ethnic disposition
that is hardly an allowance...
anglo goorl with a ****
beefie?
how's that 'elping
you?
good? **** the rest and
confiscate the retired nearing death....
i'm bothered though...
about jurisprudence without a thesaurus...
see...
i don't think it would be
applicable, let alone passable
to pass a blah,
without a thesaurus....
let alone the rule of: thumb...
i already presuppose the dictionary
definition,
but i suppose you don't,
given that the thesaurus is
contaminated with a higher
status when compared to a dictionary....
in most instances
the fabric of the kantian
gensis 0 = negation
doesn't even qualify as (a) genesis...
in the fabric of: the "inconvenience"
of stating law...
we have to resort to
"demanding" metaphor...
god forbid this childish prank
of permanently effectuating a posit of nuance;
given the leverage,
that demands a portion of
the living: to speak for the dead.
yes, perfected "imperfect" english
can sometimes spot a chance to avoid
using articles, given that there are only two
to mind...
but jurisprudence is as much
about excavating past the prime from
a thesaurus, as it is about reading a,
******* dictionary...
gnome language...
the square: isn't a square type of
people...
can't help but imagie a hellish
dentistry session...
bleeding gums, healthy teeth being
pulled out without anaesthetic...
you know,
the atypical sort of sadism, and dada.
Jun 14, 2018
Jun 14, 2018 at 10:31 AM UTC
contentious retraction of a failed
dualism,
happy schizophrenia,
my money is "biased"
in metaphor:
little people, little needs,
the rest remains a gargantuan
enterprise...
little fool, little fowl:
and from a grain of
sand, a unit, to conceptualiße
the breadth and depth of tme....
little people: you know:
belittle differences,
market the gains...
trip and attempt to fall.
oh, i took the noun confusion to be
an artefsact associated with your, profession
being taken seriously?
my bad...
because aren't
lawyers the only, "true", readers,
of a thesaurus?
nibbling qusi-vermin,
you could almost squash
them with an ****** impetus at
spotting a cockroach...
thing with rats...
esp. of a certain ethnic disposition
that is hardly an allowance...
anglo goorl with a ****
beefie?
how's that 'elping
you?
good? **** the rest and
confiscate the retired nearing death....
i'm bothered though...
about jurisprudence without a thesaurus...
see...
i don't think it would be
applicable, let alone passable
to pass a blah,
without a thesaurus....
let alone the rule of: thumb...
i already presuppose the dictionary
definition,
but i suppose you don't,
given that the thesaurus is
contaminated with a higher
status when compared to a dictionary....
in most instances
the fabric of the kantian
gensis 0 = negation
doesn't even qualify as (a) genesis...
in the fabric of: the "inconvenience"
of stating law...
we have to resort to
"demanding" metaphor...
god forbid this childish prank
of permanently effectuating a posit of nuance;
given the leverage,
that demands a portion of
the living: to speak for the dead.
yes, perfected "imperfect" english
can sometimes spot a chance to avoid
using articles, given that there are only two
to mind...
but jurisprudence is as much
about excavating past the prime from
a thesaurus, as it is about reading a,
******* dictionary...
gnome language...
the square: isn't a square type of
people...
can't help but imagie a hellish
dentistry session...
bleeding gums, healthy teeth being
pulled out without anaesthetic...
you know,
the atypical sort of sadism, and dada.