Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
jenner-mekito
My mind has been troubled, heart vexed. On a point, on a topic that is relentless. A continuation, recurring theme, that never stops. I try to block it, try to rid myself of these thoughts. But here it goes. How do you define a person? Either a man or woman. Is it their job, their upkeep? Maybe it's their physique, their physical attributes. What they possess, or in some cases, what they don't have. Is it the smile, the eyes, their build? Short, tall, curvy, or toned? What makes them special? What makes them different than the rest who look the same way? What is it about these qualities that it is really necessary? Does one become less of a man or woman without these acceptable qualities. What's wrong with "average?" What's wrong with not having these things we think we have to have? I assure you there are many we look over, pass by, because they lack certain qualities. Qualities that are not necessarily needed, only wanted. The same qualities found not just in a few people, but in many. So what separates one from the many? What makes one greater or lesser than any other? Why do you only care what people look like, instead of who they are. You get this idea that everything will be perfect, not looking past the outside beauty. Not seeing the problems or faults, instead you ignore them. Instead of looking reality in the face, and seeing beyond the surface. You tell yourself a lie and believe everything will be ok. Since what a person looks like seems to be more important. I assure you if that person was not as easy on the eyes, if they ******* up just once, ' you would call it quits. It would be a different story if it were fantasy guy or girl you wanted, you would stay for mere fact that they were beautiful. Tell me I'm wrong. Tell me that what I see isn't the truth. Tell me that your ideal "man" or "woman" is what you say it is. And I'll tell you, you have nothing but unrealistic fantasies.
0
Apr 15, 2014
Apr 15, 2014 at 5:56 PM UTC
Unrealistic Fantasies
My mind has been troubled, heart vexed. On a point, on a topic that is relentless. A continuation, recurring theme, that never stops. I try to block it, try to rid myself of these thoughts. But here it goes. How do you define a person? Either a man or woman. Is it their job, their upkeep? Maybe it's their physique, their physical attributes. What they possess, or in some cases, what they don't have. Is it the smile, the eyes, their build? Short, tall, curvy, or toned? What makes them special? What makes them different than the rest who look the same way? What is it about these qualities that it is really necessary? Does one become less of a man or woman without these acceptable qualities. What's wrong with "average?" What's wrong with not having these things we think we have to have? I assure you there are many we look over, pass by, because they lack certain qualities. Qualities that are not necessarily needed, only wanted. The same qualities found not just in a few people, but in many. So what separates one from the many? What makes one greater or lesser than any other? Why do you only care what people look like, instead of who they are. You get this idea that everything will be perfect, not looking past the outside beauty. Not seeing the problems or faults, instead you ignore them. Instead of looking reality in the face, and seeing beyond the surface. You tell yourself a lie and believe everything will be ok. Since what a person looks like seems to be more important. I assure you if that person was not as easy on the eyes, if they ******* up just once, ' you would call it quits. It would be a different story if it were fantasy guy or girl you wanted, you would stay for mere fact that they were beautiful. Tell me I'm wrong. Tell me that what I see isn't the truth. Tell me that your ideal "man" or "woman" is what you say it is. And I'll tell you, you have nothing but unrealistic fantasies.
Continue reading...
77
Sometimes I wonder if I am too critical. Taking away the limelight, casting a shadow over an idea, or am I right about my opinion? I read into things I notice when things are off, not by much, but still know when its wrong. I caught a certain movie this way. Where things were wrong, plain to see, for anyone who knows their Bible. Scriptural based problems, that are either left out or completely changed. Too much freedom in creativity when there are four distinct accounts in the Bible. Yet this one starts with the premise it is from John, where numerous distortions are found. But the biggest issue is never mentioned in the movie, why does Jesus have to die? The only viewpoint that is really shown is that Jesus "blasphemes God" according to the Jews. The issue arises when there is no explanation why Jesus has to die. What is the significant reason of Him dieing for us? This is not mentioned, neither is the Holy Spirit. There are a lot of minor issues in the movie, but to skip the purpose of why Jesus came to earth is not shown. Yes, He dies on the cross, but it doesn't reflect His   reason for doing so. I hope this movie stirs talk in finding the truth. The meaning for why Jesus died for us. That the minor details that are either left out or added, are noticed. Making people open up the Bibles to see it for themselves, as it is written. It allows people to learn more about a story that they have heard time and time again, but learning something new. Picking up on verses they never interpreted before. To learn and gain knowledge of the one Book which should matter the most, to truly understand and know the Son of God. ~The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction. Proverbs 1: 7
0
Mar 10, 2014
Mar 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM UTC
Son of God
Sometimes I wonder if I am too critical. Taking away the limelight, casting a shadow over an idea, or am I right about my opinion? I read into things I notice when things are off, not by much, but still know when its wrong. I caught a certain movie this way. Where things were wrong, plain to see, for anyone who knows their Bible. Scriptural based problems, that are either left out or completely changed. Too much freedom in creativity when there are four distinct accounts in the Bible. Yet this one starts with the premise it is from John, where numerous distortions are found. But the biggest issue is never mentioned in the movie, why does Jesus have to die? The only viewpoint that is really shown is that Jesus "blasphemes God" according to the Jews. The issue arises when there is no explanation why Jesus has to die. What is the significant reason of Him dieing for us? This is not mentioned, neither is the Holy Spirit. There are a lot of minor issues in the movie, but to skip the purpose of why Jesus came to earth is not shown. Yes, He dies on the cross, but it doesn't reflect His   reason for doing so. I hope this movie stirs talk in finding the truth. The meaning for why Jesus died for us. That the minor details that are either left out or added, are noticed. Making people open up the Bibles to see it for themselves, as it is written. It allows people to learn more about a story that they have heard time and time again, but learning something new. Picking up on verses they never interpreted before. To learn and gain knowledge of the one Book which should matter the most, to truly understand and know the Son of God. ~The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction. Proverbs 1: 7
Continue reading...
52
I have this constant battle, mainly in my mind. The thought of being with someone, having a relationship, falling in love. But I have turmoil if I should even try. I am not scared mind you, I just feel there is no one who sees me. The select ones who do, obviously find faults in me, which I know. I understand them. But there is a lack of unconditional I try so hard not to say something that will offend, but it seems all too easy to do so, without even trying. The problem is me. The things that I thought would never affect me, has. My past, my troubles have swooned, growing and festering inside, growing out of control. My being has become evil. My words harsh, my heart darkened. my thoughts deplorable. How have I come to this? For the sake of those I love, why would I become close just to destroy the bonds I have. To destroy the relationships that are dear to me, would be my undoing. I must keep a distance for their sake, so I can no longer hurt them, or make them angry. I must keep control of these demons that are inside of me. I need to change, I know that, the demons I have, they need to be kept under wraps, hidden from the rest of the world. But who could ever love me as I am, with the demons I try to hide?
0
Feb 10, 2014
Feb 10, 2014 at 12:57 PM UTC
My Demons Hide
My heart is troubled, more often now than ever before. Complications of what I see, as a one way street. It is a continuous road that never stops. It's not a give and take, requiring me to sacrifice more and more each time. I don;t even benefit from it. I don't expect to. But a little appreciation or thought would be nice. I feel like I do this out of the goodness of myself, but there is little returned, if anything at all. Again, I wouldn't do it for the sake of something in return. It just ***** when there is no reply or reciprocation of what I have done for them, ever. No thought or inclination, not a moment of time, no mention or even notion of my existence. I grow tired of these complications of no reciprocation.
0
Feb 10, 2014
Feb 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM UTC
Complications of Reciprocations
I tired of the awkwardness, feeling hurt, scarred, alone. Because that's how I feel, no matter who I am with. A room full of friends, or strangers. It doesn't matter. I am not treated any differently. Sometimes I am treated better by those I don't know. Maybe it's because they don't know me yet. The bridges I have, I try to keep. But they eventually burn. I guess the issue is me, since bridges seem to burn all the time. If they aren't burnt yet, they are on the cusp of starting.
0
Jan 20, 2014
Jan 20, 2014 at 12:51 PM UTC
Bridges Burning
Maybe I do read into things. Sometimes I do, but most of the time, I base my decision on what I see. I have the ability to remember, too much at times, remembering things I would rather forget. But what I do see and what I learn, I calculate and discern. When I bring revelation, it is merely mocked at, ignored, or rejected. Yet I tend to be right on the money. Sometimes I would rather be wrong, seeing what I knew, but kept it on the back burner. People don't understand what I see, what others do not. They don't want to face the music, or see the truth when it's right in front of them. But that's just me, maybe I am wrong, and reading into it again.
0
Jan 20, 2014
Jan 20, 2014 at 12:44 PM UTC
Reading into it
It seems like, people think they really know me. The problem is, they don't. Not unless they really care. Where my life is only shown in the words I write. No one really cares about what I write, so how does one know me? I try to share my work, not for my work's sake, but because it's me. It's clear and conscious side of me, raw but polished. Where people don't get lost with what I say or how I speak. My words are known, meaning you could know me only if you cared.
0
Jan 20, 2014
Jan 20, 2014 at 12:38 PM UTC
If You Care
Why can't I express my rage? My feelings? This disbelief of betrayal to a degree? I know you don't care, whenever I talk, you ignore me. If you do listen it is for a short time. And when I am finished, there is no answer. A sarcastic remark, no answer, no patience, and not one ounce of respect. Why do I try so hard, to just get a response, when even that is near impossible? If an answer comes, it's not helpful, it's a general solution, with no real fixes. But I guess you do this to everyone else? Because I know that's not true. There is no genuine kindness towards me, I guess you just tolerate me.
0
Dec 30, 2013
Dec 30, 2013 at 11:06 PM UTC
Toleration
I guess I am an island, where I am secluded with my thoughts. Thoughts that seem to enrage others, go against the grains, spoken even when it's not appropriate. My thoughts seem to unique, since everyone seems to not agree on my take on my opinions. Maybe I am the only one. When I share my thoughts, I am easily dismissed, ignore, or told that I am wrong. That what I see isn't real. Yet time after time I watch and see, trying to notice if I do go too far, if I take things the wrong way. Trying to discern if I blow things out of proportion, or is it real. As I watch the more saddened I become, knowing what I thought was true. And those I have spoken to, try to silence me, because what I say offends them, or makes them think before they talk to me, how they treat me. Because I am not treated the same, I know this, I watch it. I am not treated the same like everyone else. People around me act differently, even my friends. I am played the fool.
0
Dec 30, 2013
Dec 30, 2013 at 11:00 PM UTC
My Thought of a Fool
Love, it's a word we think we understand and yet we really don't. We think it's an emotion we have, and we think we fall in love with someone. But is it real? Is it more than skin deep? Is it more than just lust? More than just an idea of falling for that person? Love is more than that, It is a verb and not a noun. Love should speak volumes when we portray i,. without having to say so. Love is a choice too. We either choose to look at faults or look past them. To forgive or not. To remember those failures or forget them. Did we fall in love with the idea of love? Or the idea of the ideal person? What is the scale we use to measure whether someone is good for us or not? What characteristics are wanted and not necessarily needed. We tend to ignore the actual needs, and more heavily favor what is wanted. When we tend to stray from what is good for us, we look at everything else that shouldn't matter. Because when it's the lust of the flesh, the good and more appealing the less likely we see the issues that are underneath. Wanted what looks good, but not knowing how dangerous and how corrupted that person is. Mistakes are easily forgiven when those people are more appealing to the eyes. The flags are ignored, the warnings erased, or justified in our stupidity, just for the sake of outer beauty. I guess it's easier to put up with those fights and arguments when it looks good. But in the long run, it can be overwhelming. It's not worth the aggravation in the end. We are only lying to ourselves. Yet we are told what society deems worthy, what seems to be good, when it's only an outside appearance. When certain attributes are weighed more heavily than what really matters. What Hollywood and every degradation of both men and women tell us what we should be looking for what really counts. But that is just a lie. When we stop caring about the inside, the actual person, who they are, only concerning ourselves on what looks good and is what is attractive, that's when love has nothing to do with want we need. We use fantasies to fill our head, but our thoughts do not play out what happens in reality. The issues that come with those fantasies. That image of that person is still only an outside image, not knowing who he or she is, falling in love with an idea, not that person. Get off the cloud while you can come back to a sense of reality. Stop fantasizing about an idea that will never be your ever after. Your ideas of love is just a fantasy. Wake up and come back to reality.
0
Dec 30, 2013
Dec 30, 2013 at 12:07 AM UTC
Reality of Love
Love, it's a word we think we understand and yet we really don't. We think it's an emotion we have, and we think we fall in love with someone. But is it real? Is it more than skin deep? Is it more than just lust? More than just an idea of falling for that person? Love is more than that, It is a verb and not a noun. Love should speak volumes when we portray i,. without having to say so. Love is a choice too. We either choose to look at faults or look past them. To forgive or not. To remember those failures or forget them. Did we fall in love with the idea of love? Or the idea of the ideal person? What is the scale we use to measure whether someone is good for us or not? What characteristics are wanted and not necessarily needed. We tend to ignore the actual needs, and more heavily favor what is wanted. When we tend to stray from what is good for us, we look at everything else that shouldn't matter. Because when it's the lust of the flesh, the good and more appealing the less likely we see the issues that are underneath. Wanted what looks good, but not knowing how dangerous and how corrupted that person is. Mistakes are easily forgiven when those people are more appealing to the eyes. The flags are ignored, the warnings erased, or justified in our stupidity, just for the sake of outer beauty. I guess it's easier to put up with those fights and arguments when it looks good. But in the long run, it can be overwhelming. It's not worth the aggravation in the end. We are only lying to ourselves. Yet we are told what society deems worthy, what seems to be good, when it's only an outside appearance. When certain attributes are weighed more heavily than what really matters. What Hollywood and every degradation of both men and women tell us what we should be looking for what really counts. But that is just a lie. When we stop caring about the inside, the actual person, who they are, only concerning ourselves on what looks good and is what is attractive, that's when love has nothing to do with want we need. We use fantasies to fill our head, but our thoughts do not play out what happens in reality. The issues that come with those fantasies. That image of that person is still only an outside image, not knowing who he or she is, falling in love with an idea, not that person. Get off the cloud while you can come back to a sense of reality. Stop fantasizing about an idea that will never be your ever after. Your ideas of love is just a fantasy. Wake up and come back to reality.
Continue reading...
99