Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
david-gerald-applin
david-gerald-applin
"Pop's" she said, And that was Rosie "You have a patch That is no posy Of flowers, Because no hair Grows there." "Pop's" said Rosie "Is that fair?" David Applin August 2018
0
Aug 8, 2018
Aug 8, 2018 at 4:12 PM UTC
Pop's bald patch
The Garden of Gethsemane takes many forms, All different from our usual norms, Reflecting was and what will be As was and are translate to me. Surrendering self on this sacred ground, Is perhaps one step that I have found Hard; to disengage the self that was From the self that is before the cross. Understanding helps us know Humility, so that we can grow To replace old ambitions With new ones, in the same traditions. The Garden allows the Revelations That help us make these translations From old to new, so that in repose We hold true to purpose and resolve. David Applin August 2018
0
Aug 6, 2018
Aug 6, 2018 at 1:43 PM UTC
Revelations: learning anew
Is there anything glorious about August the twelfth? When people privileged with exceptional wealth Think it their right, to blast the sky And the birds that fly, ne'er so high. Is there dignity to the flurry that follows? To be first delivering corpses to fellows And consorts, dining in fair London town On the shot blasted flesh, fallen down ... To British soil, the land of the free! So free, to be trapped in iniquity, In pursuit of what some think to be glorious But surely Blake's heaven would be furious. David Applin 2018
0
Aug 2, 2018
Aug 2, 2018 at 2:39 PM UTC
Shooting Grouse: the glorious twelfth
Rosie’s World Up, up, up to where? To mummy’s shoulder so I can stare Upon my world below, On books, on toys and teddy, so Bought belovedly for me to share With mummy, daddy and those who care For a world of love, fit to live in My world, your world, a place so thrilling Lest we forget the joy of living. David Applin …… 21st October 2011 Copyright David Applin 2015
0
Oct 31, 2015
Oct 31, 2015 at 2:29 PM UTC
Rosie's World
Night Cries.... Night shadows darken my wall of dreams Shading my thoughts, or so it seems TO me, as misty sleep wakens to goblins and elves Lurking in corners, and on the shelves Where teddy sits and dolly too Their shapes all lumpy, as they grew Grotesque in my mind, started with themes That only come in night time dreams. But here is mummy, and daddy as well To startle the dark which quickly fell From my mind now clear, Of the shadows that cause night time fear. David Applin … 4.30am August 4th 2012 Copyright David Applin 2015
0
Oct 31, 2015
Oct 31, 2015 at 2:22 PM UTC
Night Cries
Mr Darwin, please explain Reading TS Eliot is to be drawn into timeless space where images of past and future combine in a continuous stream of thinking …. perhaps the immortality of ideas. The genetic material of life, DNA, is immortal, an unbroken thread linking life’s origins 4 billion years ago to the present ….. and future. Sequence upon sequence of symbolic letters encoding countless forms of bodies, built to the same principles inherent in the genetic code, yet morphing in endless variety according to the tenets of natural selection ….. Darwin’s idea that transformed our thinking from a moment of purposeful creation to how life changes through time. Cosmologists suggest we live in one of many possible universes perhaps in parallel time allowing parallel lives, one not knowing of the other’s existence because of the limitations of our three dimensional view of the world and its existence in the cosmos. We see in three dimensions and no more, but we are aware of more because mathematics tells us so. Mr Darwin, please explain explores the seamless continuity of Darwinian thinking with the timelessness of Eliot’s poetry….. I In my beginning is my end …. V In my end is my beginning. (East Coker, Four Quartets, TS Eliot) Mr Darwin, please explain I What is this selection of love so natural To drive men insane and women to purgatory Can Mr Darwin explain? Some ask the question But I doubt not, that his meaning is clear Why love one to one remains so dear, Though Karl denied it, Lenin too And Uncle Joe dismissed it As a plot to subvert what was good for the proletariat. But in that recent time when Hitler’s darkness shadowed The Earth Love glowed in the gloom of the despair of nations’ Terezíns Which to-day helps to repair our broken dreams Of why we love one to one. Keats loved one ***** Brawne And Coleridge his Asra But what is ecstasy’s advantage? When comes the pain of separation Mr Darwin, please explain. Is it lust, is it reproduction? But then when love is thwarted We cannot function, Where is the advantage Mr D --- what is the aim, can you explain? How the coiled spiral passing from time to time Its immortal message which condemns each generation To the pain of separation When the reaper calls, or the rival sunders The coils of love’s message we’ve inherited Since the beginning of time Why? What is the advantage? Mr D, please tell me your answer. The whales they sing one to one Like Eliot’s mermaids singing Not to Prufrock but perhaps to you and me The message of communication. Is this love as one to one Each supports another wounded By the enormity of the harpoon? The dictator’s message in another form Devoid of love, sundered, never whole Coming from that Terezín we never solve. Dysfunctional Mr D, where’s the advantage For such conflicting feelings to evolve? David Applin March 2012 II Genes are the immortal ones The links between past and future But ever present Unintentionally directing the future and fate of humankind. Silent, unobserved yet Gods of their domain Which is us and life past and future Coiled threads of eternity that determine our happenings Including our loving one to one. Yet …. In their entirety and interaction Do they, in their interaction Determine our loving one to one? The bond that binds each to each Perpetual celebration. Or …. Is their selfish blindness which some accord to be Inconsequential Like boats tossed helplessly on storm driven seas Subject to the whims of wind and rain No more than replicators housed in vehicles Subject only to the chances of a changing world. III Bodies are vehicles, genes the replicators Bodies and genes indivisible At least in the present But separated as bodies die after Genes have passed to their immortal future. Perhaps this is what is meant when they say That the gene is selfish. Accommodated in the selfless body at a particular time But then discarded as genes pass its immortality From past to future Changes slow, quick depending on stasis or acceleration According to Darwinian tenets that enfold the changes In genes and therefore bodies Through all time. IV Cycle upon cycle of genes and bodies One perpetual, the other discarded each generation By the unseen hand of an uncaring Nature. Our nature, all nature, the beauty of sunsets Driven by the mechanical clocks of cosmic cycles. Yet Relative to other Dimensions where What we see, we do not see Because of the profound limitations Of three dimensions. We see only dimly what might be past And what could be future As we struggle in the presence of tautological explanation. Body and gene, gene and body the temporary and perpetual Bound in the dance of a living presence The one ensuring the other’s future For all time. Circle upon circle, tautological argument Explaining everything and nothing but all powerful In its reductionism of humankind And life kind as whales support the one Wounded by the enormity of the harpoon Loosed by the bodies of genes Storm tossed and directionless When thinking that others’ bodies Can be discarded without thought or thinking Perpetual damnation. Tautomeric interaction. We say the same thing in different ways, Recycled ideas that parody the twenty different plots of novels That return to the same point, Come back to the common question Why do we love one to one? People ask…. ‘Can Mr Darwin explain?’ Perhaps not through bodies and genes But instead, understanding the epistasis of genes and where we live. We live in this world because of our past As genes dance to the chance of environmental shifts The whims of wind and rain, sea and wave That blow and toss the genes In their bodies, in random patterns, Some sinking, others floating Not always by chance But because they float and fight Yielding to the pressures of an uncaring nature. Like soft down yielding to the thud of falling bodies Softening their impact. So to yield as well as fight Is part of the selection of one by another In the perpetual Celebration of loving one to one. We yield to the blandishments of the soft embrace We fight to attain it And once attained, what we do is all we do To keep a hold on what we love Only to lose it to the grim reaper of all our dreams In this present world, But to regain it in worlds to come The link between past and future For immortal genes Of transitory bodies which is how We think and see our presence In time without end. V General relativity and quantum mechanics The combination of infinity and the very small Do not replace the Newtonian meaning of the day to day. Just, that Newton is displaced to another time and place Where description is precise but with uncertainty according to Heisenberg. To be certain is to fix ideas in time Like natural selection in the Darwinian mind To be propitiated without exception, else suffer extinction of self And of all that matters to self and others Sacrificed on the alter to propitiate the Gods of our certainty. That is not to say that an idea cannot be fixed in time That its central tenet is not true for eternity. But truth is relative and uncertain To be strengthened or cast aside By better truths or developments of the same. Our understanding expands with time But often returns to something that was said before And said again as if it were newly minted In the mind of its creator To become dogma And as all dogmas The truth unchanged in people’s minds. Yet the central tenet survives, as survival is the result of natural selection But with added components as Understanding expands as to what is meant by surviving and survival. To inherit the coils of love’s message is to survive. VI Can Mr Darwin explain? Perhaps is not a whole question In the same sense that answers depend on The question asked and who is asking. The truths that questions seek to answer The truths of love, beauty and heating systems Arise from answers to questions in different languages, And languages translate imperfectly from one to one As genes imperfectly translate proteins and therefore love in the Darwinian world of our dreams. Truth comes in different forms And Darwinian truth is true to the questions it addresses. But these are not the only questions of why we are, Who we are, what we are Who, what, why are we? Questions past and future asked in the present For all eternity. Christmas (25th-28th) 2012 David Applin Copyright David Applin 2015
0
Oct 31, 2015
Oct 31, 2015 at 1:47 PM UTC
Mr Darwin, please explain
Mr Darwin, please explain Reading TS Eliot is to be drawn into timeless space where images of past and future combine in a continuous stream of thinking …. perhaps the immortality of ideas. The genetic material of life, DNA, is immortal, an unbroken thread linking life’s origins 4 billion years ago to the present ….. and future. Sequence upon sequence of symbolic letters encoding countless forms of bodies, built to the same principles inherent in the genetic code, yet morphing in endless variety according to the tenets of natural selection ….. Darwin’s idea that transformed our thinking from a moment of purposeful creation to how life changes through time. Cosmologists suggest we live in one of many possible universes perhaps in parallel time allowing parallel lives, one not knowing of the other’s existence because of the limitations of our three dimensional view of the world and its existence in the cosmos. We see in three dimensions and no more, but we are aware of more because mathematics tells us so. Mr Darwin, please explain explores the seamless continuity of Darwinian thinking with the timelessness of Eliot’s poetry….. I In my beginning is my end …. V In my end is my beginning. (East Coker, Four Quartets, TS Eliot) Mr Darwin, please explain I What is this selection of love so natural To drive men insane and women to purgatory Can Mr Darwin explain? Some ask the question But I doubt not, that his meaning is clear Why love one to one remains so dear, Though Karl denied it, Lenin too And Uncle Joe dismissed it As a plot to subvert what was good for the proletariat. But in that recent time when Hitler’s darkness shadowed The Earth Love glowed in the gloom of the despair of nations’ Terezíns Which to-day helps to repair our broken dreams Of why we love one to one. Keats loved one ***** Brawne And Coleridge his Asra But what is ecstasy’s advantage? When comes the pain of separation Mr Darwin, please explain. Is it lust, is it reproduction? But then when love is thwarted We cannot function, Where is the advantage Mr D --- what is the aim, can you explain? How the coiled spiral passing from time to time Its immortal message which condemns each generation To the pain of separation When the reaper calls, or the rival sunders The coils of love’s message we’ve inherited Since the beginning of time Why? What is the advantage? Mr D, please tell me your answer. The whales they sing one to one Like Eliot’s mermaids singing Not to Prufrock but perhaps to you and me The message of communication. Is this love as one to one Each supports another wounded By the enormity of the harpoon? The dictator’s message in another form Devoid of love, sundered, never whole Coming from that Terezín we never solve. Dysfunctional Mr D, where’s the advantage For such conflicting feelings to evolve? David Applin March 2012 II Genes are the immortal ones The links between past and future But ever present Unintentionally directing the future and fate of humankind. Silent, unobserved yet Gods of their domain Which is us and life past and future Coiled threads of eternity that determine our happenings Including our loving one to one. Yet …. In their entirety and interaction Do they, in their interaction Determine our loving one to one? The bond that binds each to each Perpetual celebration. Or …. Is their selfish blindness which some accord to be Inconsequential Like boats tossed helplessly on storm driven seas Subject to the whims of wind and rain No more than replicators housed in vehicles Subject only to the chances of a changing world. III Bodies are vehicles, genes the replicators Bodies and genes indivisible At least in the present But separated as bodies die after Genes have passed to their immortal future. Perhaps this is what is meant when they say That the gene is selfish. Accommodated in the selfless body at a particular time But then discarded as genes pass its immortality From past to future Changes slow, quick depending on stasis or acceleration According to Darwinian tenets that enfold the changes In genes and therefore bodies Through all time. IV Cycle upon cycle of genes and bodies One perpetual, the other discarded each generation By the unseen hand of an uncaring Nature. Our nature, all nature, the beauty of sunsets Driven by the mechanical clocks of cosmic cycles. Yet Relative to other Dimensions where What we see, we do not see Because of the profound limitations Of three dimensions. We see only dimly what might be past And what could be future As we struggle in the presence of tautological explanation. Body and gene, gene and body the temporary and perpetual Bound in the dance of a living presence The one ensuring the other’s future For all time. Circle upon circle, tautological argument Explaining everything and nothing but all powerful In its reductionism of humankind And life kind as whales support the one Wounded by the enormity of the harpoon Loosed by the bodies of genes Storm tossed and directionless When thinking that others’ bodies Can be discarded without thought or thinking Perpetual damnation. Tautomeric interaction. We say the same thing in different ways, Recycled ideas that parody the twenty different plots of novels That return to the same point, Come back to the common question Why do we love one to one? People ask…. ‘Can Mr Darwin explain?’ Perhaps not through bodies and genes But instead, understanding the epistasis of genes and where we live. We live in this world because of our past As genes dance to the chance of environmental shifts The whims of wind and rain, sea and wave That blow and toss the genes In their bodies, in random patterns, Some sinking, others floating Not always by chance But because they float and fight Yielding to the pressures of an uncaring nature. Like soft down yielding to the thud of falling bodies Softening their impact. So to yield as well as fight Is part of the selection of one by another In the perpetual Celebration of loving one to one. We yield to the blandishments of the soft embrace We fight to attain it And once attained, what we do is all we do To keep a hold on what we love Only to lose it to the grim reaper of all our dreams In this present world, But to regain it in worlds to come The link between past and future For immortal genes Of transitory bodies which is how We think and see our presence In time without end. V General relativity and quantum mechanics The combination of infinity and the very small Do not replace the Newtonian meaning of the day to day. Just, that Newton is displaced to another time and place Where description is precise but with uncertainty according to Heisenberg. To be certain is to fix ideas in time Like natural selection in the Darwinian mind To be propitiated without exception, else suffer extinction of self And of all that matters to self and others Sacrificed on the alter to propitiate the Gods of our certainty. That is not to say that an idea cannot be fixed in time That its central tenet is not true for eternity. But truth is relative and uncertain To be strengthened or cast aside By better truths or developments of the same. Our understanding expands with time But often returns to something that was said before And said again as if it were newly minted In the mind of its creator To become dogma And as all dogmas The truth unchanged in people’s minds. Yet the central tenet survives, as survival is the result of natural selection But with added components as Understanding expands as to what is meant by surviving and survival. To inherit the coils of love’s message is to survive. VI Can Mr Darwin explain? Perhaps is not a whole question In the same sense that answers depend on The question asked and who is asking. The truths that questions seek to answer The truths of love, beauty and heating systems Arise from answers to questions in different languages, And languages translate imperfectly from one to one As genes imperfectly translate proteins and therefore love in the Darwinian world of our dreams. Truth comes in different forms And Darwinian truth is true to the questions it addresses. But these are not the only questions of why we are, Who we are, what we are Who, what, why are we? Questions past and future asked in the present For all eternity. Christmas (25th-28th) 2012 David Applin Copyright David Applin 2015
Continue reading...
203
I These are hard materials Sharp edged, inflexible To a degree That unfolds the truth, And one truth Leads to the next In linear sequence. Each from the others, isolated Yet dependent On what has gone before, And what follows for the confirmation of truth’s verity. Various truths are the data set of probability, Flexible to a degree Because of the uncertainty of absolute verity That only singularity allows. The statistic of one That even when wrong Its absoluteness is unquestionable Because to question is not to know What has gone before. To know is singular in its effect, Its purpose sustained by the uncertainty of data sets From which truth derives. The metaphysics of it all Betrays the conceit of knowledge And those that claim knowledge Such that they impose their understanding On others do not know And care even less, Except when their ignorance Results in what is cared for…. All suppressed by the singularity of knowing By those who acknowledge a statistic of one. Preferring the comfort of its certainty Rather than the uncertainty That arises form the truth of data sets. II Data sets determine league tables Positions of football clubs And universities Where those learning to know Know what they are learning And rate it accordingly. Because as customers It is said that They are entitled to know Even if they are learning The data sets that allow them to understand What they are attempting to know Perhaps without conscious thought of The void of ignorance that learning attempts to fill. Yet in their unknowing, the certainty of the learning Determines the positions of institutions in league tables In turn compiled from the data sets Of incomplete knowledge Asserted with conviction Establishing what is said to be true In ignorance of sure foundations. I wish that I had the conviction of others To be certain of what I know Without doubt Without hesitation Untrammelled by thoughts of the uncertainty of data sets Compiled by the compilation of singularities. Which itself compels another thought That we all derive from a single small point, Infinitesimally small but infinitely massive Exploding once or perhaps in series Like the popping of a two-stroke petrol engine That propelled motorbikes and lawn mowers In yesteryear. And yet we are saying the same thing In different ways Unrelenting in the stream of thought And consciousness But …. Please allow the words’ meanings to breath. Where is the pause To allow the assimilation of meaning? The punctuation of time and space The meaning of words Arises from their spacing And timing. David Applin August 23rd 8:00am-ish 2014 III Yet the certainty of data sets Give us comfort Those who await the miracle of birth Calculate the probability of certainty From statistics derived from the accumulation Of data To give the certainty of a happy outcome A statistic of one…. or at most two or three To which we all cling and which data Accumulated in sets allows to be certain… Or at least to hope to be certain That the outcome will be happy And reinforce our faith in belief Itself knowledge in the absence of evidence Truth uncurled by those hard materials Derived from numbers Each in itself a number And therefore a singularity Which hard materials cannot uncurl Only their interpretation Can reveal the truth of data sets Each consisting of the singular truths That interpretation cannot uncurl, Because to do so would give us a statistic of one Which cannot be questioned Because it stands alone Inflexible, somewhat obtuse without the context Of the other singularities that make up the data set. Befriended of one another, the collective now represents a version of truth Because each singularity gives context to its companions So that collectively their truth is revealed As a statistic. One as a statistic cannot be Because it lacks the context of its companions, QED David Applin Queen Victoria North Sea Lying off Ostend 25th October (evening) 2014 Copyright David Applin 2015
0
Oct 31, 2015
Oct 31, 2015 at 1:33 PM UTC
A Statistic of One
I These are hard materials Sharp edged, inflexible To a degree That unfolds the truth, And one truth Leads to the next In linear sequence. Each from the others, isolated Yet dependent On what has gone before, And what follows for the confirmation of truth’s verity. Various truths are the data set of probability, Flexible to a degree Because of the uncertainty of absolute verity That only singularity allows. The statistic of one That even when wrong Its absoluteness is unquestionable Because to question is not to know What has gone before. To know is singular in its effect, Its purpose sustained by the uncertainty of data sets From which truth derives. The metaphysics of it all Betrays the conceit of knowledge And those that claim knowledge Such that they impose their understanding On others do not know And care even less, Except when their ignorance Results in what is cared for…. All suppressed by the singularity of knowing By those who acknowledge a statistic of one. Preferring the comfort of its certainty Rather than the uncertainty That arises form the truth of data sets. II Data sets determine league tables Positions of football clubs And universities Where those learning to know Know what they are learning And rate it accordingly. Because as customers It is said that They are entitled to know Even if they are learning The data sets that allow them to understand What they are attempting to know Perhaps without conscious thought of The void of ignorance that learning attempts to fill. Yet in their unknowing, the certainty of the learning Determines the positions of institutions in league tables In turn compiled from the data sets Of incomplete knowledge Asserted with conviction Establishing what is said to be true In ignorance of sure foundations. I wish that I had the conviction of others To be certain of what I know Without doubt Without hesitation Untrammelled by thoughts of the uncertainty of data sets Compiled by the compilation of singularities. Which itself compels another thought That we all derive from a single small point, Infinitesimally small but infinitely massive Exploding once or perhaps in series Like the popping of a two-stroke petrol engine That propelled motorbikes and lawn mowers In yesteryear. And yet we are saying the same thing In different ways Unrelenting in the stream of thought And consciousness But …. Please allow the words’ meanings to breath. Where is the pause To allow the assimilation of meaning? The punctuation of time and space The meaning of words Arises from their spacing And timing. David Applin August 23rd 8:00am-ish 2014 III Yet the certainty of data sets Give us comfort Those who await the miracle of birth Calculate the probability of certainty From statistics derived from the accumulation Of data To give the certainty of a happy outcome A statistic of one…. or at most two or three To which we all cling and which data Accumulated in sets allows to be certain… Or at least to hope to be certain That the outcome will be happy And reinforce our faith in belief Itself knowledge in the absence of evidence Truth uncurled by those hard materials Derived from numbers Each in itself a number And therefore a singularity Which hard materials cannot uncurl Only their interpretation Can reveal the truth of data sets Each consisting of the singular truths That interpretation cannot uncurl, Because to do so would give us a statistic of one Which cannot be questioned Because it stands alone Inflexible, somewhat obtuse without the context Of the other singularities that make up the data set. Befriended of one another, the collective now represents a version of truth Because each singularity gives context to its companions So that collectively their truth is revealed As a statistic. One as a statistic cannot be Because it lacks the context of its companions, QED David Applin Queen Victoria North Sea Lying off Ostend 25th October (evening) 2014 Copyright David Applin 2015
Continue reading...
127
'Hopes and Dreams'...explores the limitations of perception in more than three dimensions plus time. I Uncoupling hopes from truth sometimes reveals reality Which is hard to bear According to Eliot. The difference between hope and what is real Is sometimes the basis for laughter Or tears….. In equal measure Depending on the deficit Between reality, and the reality of hoping. Two sides of the same coin The masks of theatre, Comedy and tragedy. Yet reality is what we face day to day Uncoupled from hope An atheistic vision of what is true In which dreams expire. Hopes, dreams and reality Congregate in theistic minds As a woven integrity But is the congress true? Atheist and theist in perpetual conflict One offering only truth, The other hoping that belief is true But, to what ….? In this world caught in three dimensions But do not forget time that marks when We are born and when we die According to Ecclesiastes. The atheism of truths of a certain kind Confined by the question asked And who is asking, and the way of asking, Atheist and theist talking at each other But not in conversation A dialogue of deafness to other points of view An unbridged chasm for all of human history. The certainty of truth is one problem, Because certainty brooks no other view But remember the constraints of truth’s discovery and then assertion In three dimensions, and do not forget time. Unwittingly Carl Sagan made the point in flatland A place of two dimensions, Breadth and width, but no height Infinitesimally flat, thin Flat and thin, so that an apple In its plump three dimensional roundness Made its visit, announced its presence But left only an infinitesimally flat, thin Impression of its visitation, With its announcement seemingly coming from wherever, Infinite confusion. For flatlanders who perceived a visitation Without explanation A mystery within which we experience The determinism of truth Not qualified by the dimensions In which it’s made Or defined To the confusion of those who question truth, If truth means the assertion of certainty. Was it for flatlanders first cause? Just like Paley’s watchmaker of the watch found on the heath, Each trapped in their respective Two dimensions and three dimensions Limited by their dimensionality Of what they could see or imagine. Not yet liberated by many dimensions That liberated Tennyson to understand That more is achieved by dreaming without limits. Tennyson said… That more things are achieved by prayer Than this world dreams of, But what are dreams? Visions of hope, or the darkness of damnation? But can we imagine these visions In many dimensions? And find new truths which we cannot perceive In the day to day. II Dreams can be suspension Between what is real and what we hope for, Or …… A plunge into an abyss of horrors The nightmare’s nightcrusher That reflects the fears of our experience, The fears of Fuseli’s nights Of grotesque creatures that taunt the hopes Of our tomorrows By revealing the layers of yesterday’s experience, A past that haunts the future In the day to day. Yet redeemed by intentions For the good, And honourable to the nature of humankind, And lifekind with which we share organic ancestry. Dreams release the mind to find another place, Another dimension, where what happens Can happen and more than we can suppose According to Haldane. Limitless possibilities that dreamtimes Expose what we do not own But instead we are a part of. Land, sea and air fused with the spirit Of peoples that inhabit distant shores Where they are one with the place Where they are, were and will be For all time. The dreamtime of Australia’s Original peoples. And so the plump apple Becomes a part of the experience Of those who live in two dimensions, Carl’s flatlanders experience their Dreamtime of first causes Because the missing dimension disallows Their understanding of what is real. So conflate the idea to many dimensions And you can see what I mean. Imagine the unimaginable That cannot be seen Because of the constraints of three dimensions. And do not forget time Perhaps the portal for imagining What cannot be experienced In spacetime warped and curved By the embrace of gravity. We sail in this cosmic sea Not seeing its possibilities Because we are not equipped To see through a glass darkly Or so Corinthians says But to half see, dimly see Love And the truth of black holes Where physics is sundered Perhaps allowing passage to other creations To us mere visions of what we aspire to be And understand Just as Blake saw heaven in a wild flower. III To perceive the possibility of many dimensions Is to free the mind From superstition From the prejudices That blight the landscape of our thinking, And the landscape of dreams When we perceive self As if disembodied Floating on the ceiling looking down Detachedly on what we do And what others do in the day to day. Doings driven by the limited framework Of width, breadth and height. Width and breadth and height And do not forget the passage of time In which our doings take place. One is singular in mind and body Meaning self in the day to day. To be beside oneself is joy and anger The Janus faced self Somewhat like the masks of comedy and tragedy But of emotion and not theatrical circumstance. How many multiples of Space and time Are needed to be beside oneself In a quantum universe? Or universes where to touch would be Annihilation of self Tracked as energy pure, and as simple As the dreams of our disembodied self Looking down from the ceiling. IV Is hope the delusion of optimism, Dreams its manifestation of unreality? Who can say because analysis Is limited within the context of our perception. Perception influenced by prejudice and misunderstanding Because we are limited by what Can be understood In three dimensions, And do not forget time And gravity And the failure of its resolution with dimension and time Limiting understanding. But…… If we acknowledge the limitations Even if not understanding the quantum context Then, given we are prepared to accept the uncertainty Described by Heisenberg, Then we are mentally equipped To understand that truth is provisional But with verity according to experience Accumulated through the continuity of history. We try to resolve contradictions Because resolution anchors us into the certainty of Our present experience, And certainty is comfort, allowing us to live Day to day. David Applin, May 2013 Copyright David Applin 2015
0
Oct 31, 2015
Oct 31, 2015 at 11:37 AM UTC
Hopes and Dreams
'Hopes and Dreams'...explores the limitations of perception in more than three dimensions plus time. I Uncoupling hopes from truth sometimes reveals reality Which is hard to bear According to Eliot. The difference between hope and what is real Is sometimes the basis for laughter Or tears….. In equal measure Depending on the deficit Between reality, and the reality of hoping. Two sides of the same coin The masks of theatre, Comedy and tragedy. Yet reality is what we face day to day Uncoupled from hope An atheistic vision of what is true In which dreams expire. Hopes, dreams and reality Congregate in theistic minds As a woven integrity But is the congress true? Atheist and theist in perpetual conflict One offering only truth, The other hoping that belief is true But, to what ….? In this world caught in three dimensions But do not forget time that marks when We are born and when we die According to Ecclesiastes. The atheism of truths of a certain kind Confined by the question asked And who is asking, and the way of asking, Atheist and theist talking at each other But not in conversation A dialogue of deafness to other points of view An unbridged chasm for all of human history. The certainty of truth is one problem, Because certainty brooks no other view But remember the constraints of truth’s discovery and then assertion In three dimensions, and do not forget time. Unwittingly Carl Sagan made the point in flatland A place of two dimensions, Breadth and width, but no height Infinitesimally flat, thin Flat and thin, so that an apple In its plump three dimensional roundness Made its visit, announced its presence But left only an infinitesimally flat, thin Impression of its visitation, With its announcement seemingly coming from wherever, Infinite confusion. For flatlanders who perceived a visitation Without explanation A mystery within which we experience The determinism of truth Not qualified by the dimensions In which it’s made Or defined To the confusion of those who question truth, If truth means the assertion of certainty. Was it for flatlanders first cause? Just like Paley’s watchmaker of the watch found on the heath, Each trapped in their respective Two dimensions and three dimensions Limited by their dimensionality Of what they could see or imagine. Not yet liberated by many dimensions That liberated Tennyson to understand That more is achieved by dreaming without limits. Tennyson said… That more things are achieved by prayer Than this world dreams of, But what are dreams? Visions of hope, or the darkness of damnation? But can we imagine these visions In many dimensions? And find new truths which we cannot perceive In the day to day. II Dreams can be suspension Between what is real and what we hope for, Or …… A plunge into an abyss of horrors The nightmare’s nightcrusher That reflects the fears of our experience, The fears of Fuseli’s nights Of grotesque creatures that taunt the hopes Of our tomorrows By revealing the layers of yesterday’s experience, A past that haunts the future In the day to day. Yet redeemed by intentions For the good, And honourable to the nature of humankind, And lifekind with which we share organic ancestry. Dreams release the mind to find another place, Another dimension, where what happens Can happen and more than we can suppose According to Haldane. Limitless possibilities that dreamtimes Expose what we do not own But instead we are a part of. Land, sea and air fused with the spirit Of peoples that inhabit distant shores Where they are one with the place Where they are, were and will be For all time. The dreamtime of Australia’s Original peoples. And so the plump apple Becomes a part of the experience Of those who live in two dimensions, Carl’s flatlanders experience their Dreamtime of first causes Because the missing dimension disallows Their understanding of what is real. So conflate the idea to many dimensions And you can see what I mean. Imagine the unimaginable That cannot be seen Because of the constraints of three dimensions. And do not forget time Perhaps the portal for imagining What cannot be experienced In spacetime warped and curved By the embrace of gravity. We sail in this cosmic sea Not seeing its possibilities Because we are not equipped To see through a glass darkly Or so Corinthians says But to half see, dimly see Love And the truth of black holes Where physics is sundered Perhaps allowing passage to other creations To us mere visions of what we aspire to be And understand Just as Blake saw heaven in a wild flower. III To perceive the possibility of many dimensions Is to free the mind From superstition From the prejudices That blight the landscape of our thinking, And the landscape of dreams When we perceive self As if disembodied Floating on the ceiling looking down Detachedly on what we do And what others do in the day to day. Doings driven by the limited framework Of width, breadth and height. Width and breadth and height And do not forget the passage of time In which our doings take place. One is singular in mind and body Meaning self in the day to day. To be beside oneself is joy and anger The Janus faced self Somewhat like the masks of comedy and tragedy But of emotion and not theatrical circumstance. How many multiples of Space and time Are needed to be beside oneself In a quantum universe? Or universes where to touch would be Annihilation of self Tracked as energy pure, and as simple As the dreams of our disembodied self Looking down from the ceiling. IV Is hope the delusion of optimism, Dreams its manifestation of unreality? Who can say because analysis Is limited within the context of our perception. Perception influenced by prejudice and misunderstanding Because we are limited by what Can be understood In three dimensions, And do not forget time And gravity And the failure of its resolution with dimension and time Limiting understanding. But…… If we acknowledge the limitations Even if not understanding the quantum context Then, given we are prepared to accept the uncertainty Described by Heisenberg, Then we are mentally equipped To understand that truth is provisional But with verity according to experience Accumulated through the continuity of history. We try to resolve contradictions Because resolution anchors us into the certainty of Our present experience, And certainty is comfort, allowing us to live Day to day. David Applin, May 2013 Copyright David Applin 2015
Continue reading...
206
Tea Talk (or Taking Tea) Jam comes first And then the cream Said the scone from Cornwall To one ‘n’ all Taking tea Milk jug blinked. The teaspoon gasped, Who would have linked The layers of bliss that sweetly kiss With their order between the halves of a scone From Cornwall Where one ‘n’ all Know that the milk is churned Until it’s solid Then we say the cream is clotted. The teapot looked at the scone from Devon Who knows that cream and jam is heaven But only if the cream comes first And then the jam . . . . . My thoughts exactly said the ham From between its sandwich fingers Where it lingers Until it’s time for tea. ‘Are you sure?’ the teacup said To ham within its breaden bed. Saucer asked the cucumber salad, ‘Should jam come first?’ ‘But does it matter?’ said cucumber salad. ‘It’s a ballad So red and white, A symphony of taste Into which to bite. It is so right For those who are taking tea,’ ‘Jam then cream, is what you do,’ Insisted Cornwall’s scone who As we know likes cream to be clotted. But tomato blushed and quickly said, ‘With cream from Devon I am besotted Because we know it’s clotted. . . . . Too. Onion, hearing Cornwall and Devon Knows that cream and jam are heaven . . . . . But jam and cream are bliss Sealed with a kiss that is heaven . . . . .too. The dilemma of order fuels onion’s frustration And onion’s tears lead to prostration For those who are taking tea. What is to be done To solve the question of order Jam first . . . . . or cream? The issue borders On the ridiculous As the layers sweetly intermingle Like the lovers’ kiss As those who are taking tea Bite . . . . . Ouch! said onion The scone from Cornwall And the scone from Devon ‘Either way is heaven. David Applin Copyright …David Applin (2015)
0
May 9, 2015
May 9, 2015 at 7:13 AM UTC
Tea Talk (or Taking Tea)
Tea Talk (or Taking Tea) Jam comes first And then the cream Said the scone from Cornwall To one ‘n’ all Taking tea Milk jug blinked. The teaspoon gasped, Who would have linked The layers of bliss that sweetly kiss With their order between the halves of a scone From Cornwall Where one ‘n’ all Know that the milk is churned Until it’s solid Then we say the cream is clotted. The teapot looked at the scone from Devon Who knows that cream and jam is heaven But only if the cream comes first And then the jam . . . . . My thoughts exactly said the ham From between its sandwich fingers Where it lingers Until it’s time for tea. ‘Are you sure?’ the teacup said To ham within its breaden bed. Saucer asked the cucumber salad, ‘Should jam come first?’ ‘But does it matter?’ said cucumber salad. ‘It’s a ballad So red and white, A symphony of taste Into which to bite. It is so right For those who are taking tea,’ ‘Jam then cream, is what you do,’ Insisted Cornwall’s scone who As we know likes cream to be clotted. But tomato blushed and quickly said, ‘With cream from Devon I am besotted Because we know it’s clotted. . . . . Too. Onion, hearing Cornwall and Devon Knows that cream and jam are heaven . . . . . But jam and cream are bliss Sealed with a kiss that is heaven . . . . .too. The dilemma of order fuels onion’s frustration And onion’s tears lead to prostration For those who are taking tea. What is to be done To solve the question of order Jam first . . . . . or cream? The issue borders On the ridiculous As the layers sweetly intermingle Like the lovers’ kiss As those who are taking tea Bite . . . . . Ouch! said onion The scone from Cornwall And the scone from Devon ‘Either way is heaven. David Applin Copyright …David Applin (2015)
Continue reading...
64
Lily’s first poem Lily’s eyes are a pool of dreams Love and laughter are two great themes To fill her life with wonders to be Which are the dreams we wish for thee. Lily’s name is a field of flowers Weaving the colours of beautiful bowers Havens of peace made secure By mummy and daddy who make life so sure. Sure to know, and sure to do The future, my future is the clue To forge the dreams of beautiful flowers Whose powers Are the symbol of Loves great tower. David Applin 11.00pm November 17th 2014 David Applin (Copyright 2015)
0
May 9, 2015
May 9, 2015 at 7:03 AM UTC
Lily's first poem